Hey guys,
excuse for not having responded earlier, I had some problems at work, but to
finally comment because of kevin I could find the problem. The problem was
given by a lack of path but not on Linux, but on clients host in the
configuration of the router zyxell itself.
As I have noted, the
I need to access my LAN to the Internet but I can only do that from the hosts
directly connected to the router zyxell (including FC), but not from my other
LANS :(
Please I need your support and thank you very much in advance!!
This sounds like you don't have sufficient routing tables set
snip
1) there is no default gateway entered in your netstat -nr command. Gateway
0.0.0.0 is
missing in your routing table. So, where do you expect to go your traffic to?
2) you need the appropiate entries for accepting connections with iptables.
just setting
the ip.forward.v4 param is not
ppps wrote:
First off, what is that extra netstat -rn entry for eth6
(169.254.0.0...looks like some Windows default garbage)? Can't help but
wonder what that's doing to routing to the 192.168.10 network on the
machine.
I have tried to eliminate that route with the command
route del -net
ppps wrote:
First off, what is that extra netstat -rn entry for eth6
(169.254.0.0...looks like some Windows default garbage)? Can't help but
wonder what that's doing to routing to the 192.168.10 network on the
machine.
I have tried to eliminate that route with the command
route del
Am Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:58:37 -0500
schrieb Kevin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ppps wrote:
First off, what is that extra netstat -rn entry for eth6
(169.254.0.0...looks like some Windows default garbage)? Can't
help but wonder what that's doing to routing to the 192.168.10
network on the
Hey guys,
first of all I would like to thank them for their great support, thanks to that
I could now bring forward a package from both ends, or for any network, except
for one detail :( The 192.168.5.0 network is supported by a router zyxell
Prestige 660-Hw T1-V2 that gives me access to the
Hey guys,
first of all I would like to thank them for their great support, thanks to that
I could now bring forward a package from both ends, or for any network, except
for one detail. The 192.168.5.0 network is supported by a router zyxell
Prestige 660-Hw T1-V2, that give me access to the
Hey guys,
first of all I would like to thank them for their great support, thanks to that
I could now bring forward a package from both ends, or for any network, except
for one detail. The 192.168.5.0 network is supported by a router zyxell
Prestige 660-Hw T1-V2, that give me access to the
ppps wrote:
Hey guys,
first of all I would like to thank them for their great support, thanks to
that I could now bring forward a package from both ends, or for any network,
except for one detail :( The 192.168.5.0 network is supported by a router
zyxell Prestige 660-Hw T1-V2 that gives
Hi Mike, thanks for the reply unfortunately this does not help :(
my routing table already has these routes :(
and while trying to run the ip route it return
Rtnetlink answers: File exists
I have tried to eliminate routes with
the route del -net 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 and then add the
ppps wrote:
Hi Mike, thanks for the reply unfortunately this does not help :(
my routing table already has these routes :(
and while trying to run the ip route it return
Rtnetlink answers: File exists
I have tried to eliminate routes with
the route del -net 192.168.10.0 netmask
ppps wrote:
Hi Kevin, hier the information
Information from FIREWALL
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] ~]# ifconfig
eth4 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:D1:8C:02:5E
inet addr:192.168.5.254 Bcast:192.168.5.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr:
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] ~]# netstat -nr
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
192.168.5.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth4
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
14 matches
Mail list logo
