Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:21:22PM +, Beartooth wrote:
Trying to update my wife's F10 machine, I got a failure with the
message :
Public key for NetworkManager-glib-0.7.0.99-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm is not
installed
So I deleted NM and whatever-all else I had to, till
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:31:50 Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:20:12 +1030
Tim wrote:
There's no reason to do any of these unless there's something actually
wrong.
Seconded. When things are working fine, yum takes care of itself.
The most suspicious thing I get is I
Tim wrote:
Seconded. When things are working fine, yum takes care of itself.
You *might* want to clear out downloaded packages, if drive space is
important to you.
snip
If you
never want to keep them, you can set yum to not cache downloaded
packages.
Which is the default on current
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:17 +, Beartooth wrote:
I have a Very Dumb Yum Question : why is it that the all in yum
clean all does not include metadata?
I'm curious why you really need to do a yum clean all. Sounds like you
have some other bugs that really need sorting, if you need to do that.
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:01:01 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:17 +, Beartooth wrote:
I have a Very Dumb Yum Question : why is it that the all in yum
clean all does not include metadata?
I'm curious why you really need to do a yum clean all. Sounds like you
have some other
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 14:58 +, Beartooth wrote:
I've been advised that three commands are good to run at long
intervals : yum clean all, updatedb, and rpm --rebuilddb; but I have
no sense of time, and I was very absent-minded even before I got old.
There's no reason to do any of these
Beartooth:
I've been advised that three commands are good to run at long
intervals : yum clean all, updatedb, and rpm --rebuilddb; but I have
no sense of time, and I was very absent-minded even before I got old.
Patrick O'Callaghan:
There's no reason to do any of these unless there's
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:20:12 +1030
Tim wrote:
There's no reason to do any of these unless there's something actually
wrong.
Seconded. When things are working fine, yum takes care of itself.
The most suspicious thing I get is I often see something about
current something or other is
Trying to update my wife's F10 machine, I got a failure with the
message :
Public key for NetworkManager-glib-0.7.0.99-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm is not
installed
So I deleted NM and whatever-all else I had to, till yum update
completed normally. Then I told yum to install
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:21 +, Beartooth wrote:
Trying to update my wife's F10 machine, I got a failure with the
message :
Public key for NetworkManager-glib-0.7.0.99-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm is not
installed
This has been reported several times. Apparently it's being worked on.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:21:22PM +, Beartooth wrote:
Trying to update my wife's F10 machine, I got a failure with the
message :
Public key for NetworkManager-glib-0.7.0.99-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm is not
installed
So I deleted NM and whatever-all else I had to, till yum
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:04:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:21 +, Beartooth wrote:
[...]
This has been reported several times. Apparently it's being worked on.
Yes, so I saw -- an instant too late; my apologies!
So I deleted NM and
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:41:38 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
[...]
You don't have to delete the package, though; you could do this:
yum --exclude=NetworkManager\* update
You can add additional excludes as needed, too:
yum --exclude={NetworkManager\*,foobar} update
That's parsed
and the new NM will update along with any other updates due - it may take a
little while for all mirrors to syncso just be a little patient
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/NM-key-hassle-tp22437969p22439903.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:52:47 -0700, Mike Cloaked wrote:
[...]
The issue with NM keys is already fixed - do
yum clean metadata
yum -y update
and the new NM will update along with any other updates due - it may
take a little while for all mirrors to syncso just be a little
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:17 +, Beartooth wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:52:47 -0700, Mike Cloaked wrote:
[...]
The issue with NM keys is already fixed - do
yum clean metadata
yum -y update
and the new NM will update along with any other updates due - it may
take a little
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:52:04 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:17 +, Beartooth wrote:
Working fine now -- but I have a Very Dumb Yum Question : why is
it that the all in yum clean all does not include metadata?
It does, according to the man page. If it
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 21:27 +, Beartooth wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:52:04 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:17 +, Beartooth wrote:
Working fine now -- but I have a Very Dumb Yum Question : why is
it that the all in yum clean all does not include
18 matches
Mail list logo
