On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:39:41 -0400, Bill wrote:
Coincidence. Yum cannot know that there are updates in repos which
are not enabled.
If the repos were enabled at one time and the data is still available it
can be
checked,
It doesn't load the metadata. Not even the cached one.
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 15:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:43:28 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote:
...snip...
This is all fascinating, but what I come away with is yum has a
complex set of rules for color-coding its output, but the developers
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 14:40:20 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
You're absolutely right. I naively thought that info on colourizing the
output of yum would be in the man page for yum, while in fact that page
simply mentions that you can colorize the output but doesn't say what
it means, nor that
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 14:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 14:40:20 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
You're absolutely right. I naively thought that info on colourizing the
output of yum would be in the man page for yum, while in fact that page
simply mentions that you can
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 14:52:56 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 14:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 14:40:20 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
You're absolutely right. I naively thought that info on colourizing the
output of yum would be in the man page for
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:20:31 -0400, Bill wrote:
Your guess is right, the updates are in disabled repos (at least mine all are),
but they are packages for which an update exists.
Coincidence. Yum cannot know that there are updates in repos which
are not enabled.
If
Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-06-19 14:38:35, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I notice that some lines in the output of yum list installed are
highlighted in red. There doesn't seem to be any mention of this in
the
manual. Does anyone know what it means?
Highlighting is useful
doesn't change
the colours in yum list installed output. All I does is to compare the
installed package with the metadata for the enabled repos and detect the
different version. Then it prints the package in yellow, not in
red. Additionally, it looks at yumdb to find out from which repo
/usr/sbin/yumdb),
but it cannot rely on that information, and deleting yumdb doesn't change
the colours in yum list installed output. All I does is to compare the
installed package with the metadata for the enabled repos and detect the
different version. Then it prints the package in yellow
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:43:28 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote:
...snip...
This is all fascinating, but what I come away with is yum has a
complex set of rules for color-coding its output, but the developers
can't be bothered documenting them.
Does 'man yum.conf' and
, and deleting yumdb doesn't change
the colours in yum list installed output. All I does is to compare the
installed package with the metadata for the enabled repos and detect the
different version. Then it prints the package in yellow, not in
red. Additionally, it looks at yumdb to find out from which
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:20:31 -0400, Bill wrote:
Your guess is right, the updates are in disabled repos (at least mine all
are),
but they are packages for which an update exists.
Coincidence. Yum cannot know that there are updates in repos which
are not enabled.
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 11:04 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:20:31 -0400, Bill wrote:
Your guess is right, the updates are in disabled repos (at least mine all
are),
but they are packages for which an update exists.
Coincidence. Yum cannot know that there are
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:24:27 -0430, Patrick wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 11:04 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:20:31 -0400, Bill wrote:
Your guess is right, the updates are in disabled repos (at least mine all
are),
but they are packages for which an update
I notice that some lines in the output of yum list installed are
highlighted in red. There doesn't seem to be any mention of this in the
manual. Does anyone know what it means?
Highlighting is useful as a visual clue, but if the info is meaningful
it should also be indicated in such a way
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I notice that some lines in the output of yum list installed are
highlighted in red. There doesn't seem to be any mention of this in the
manual. Does anyone know what it means?
Highlighting is useful as a visual clue, but if the info is meaningful
it should also
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:38 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I notice that some lines in the output of yum list installed are
highlighted in red. There doesn't seem to be any mention of this in the
manual. Does anyone know what it means?
Highlighting is useful
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:38 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I notice that some lines in the output of yum list installed are
highlighted in red. There doesn't seem to be any mention of this in the
manual. Does anyone know what it means
On 09-06-19 14:38:35, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I notice that some lines in the output of yum list installed are
highlighted in red. There doesn't seem to be any mention of this in
the
manual. Does anyone know what it means?
Highlighting is useful as a visual
19 matches
Mail list logo
