Second try: Clarification of statement about stateless sytem]

2008-12-12 Thread Aaron Konstam
I tried once and got no response so I am trying again. It is strange that people understand all such obscure things but can't explain one of the many gobbledygook statements made in the release notes. In section 2.2.6 of the F10 release notes is the following statement: Support for keeping a

Re: Second try: Clarification of statement about stateless sytem]

2008-12-12 Thread Rick Stevens
Aaron Konstam wrote: I tried once and got no response so I am trying again. It is strange that people understand all such obscure things but can't explain one of the many gobbledygook statements made in the release notes. In section 2.2.6 of the F10 release notes is the following statement:

Re: Second try: Clarification of statement about stateless sytem]

2008-12-12 Thread john wendel
Aaron Konstam wrote: I tried once and got no response so I am trying again. It is strange that people understand all such obscure things but can't explain one of the many gobbledygook statements made in the release notes. In section 2.2.6 of the F10 release notes is the following statement:

Re: Second try: Clarification of statement about stateless sytem]

2008-12-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Aaron Konstam wrote: I tried once and got no response so I am trying again. It is strange that people understand all such obscure things but can't explain one of the many gobbledygook statements made in the release notes. In section 2.2.6 of the F10 release notes is the following statement: