can log-in into virtual system - it works fine.
Then (using the similar rules) I configured Apache on virtual box - and it
works from outside as expected.
However before I setup web application from outside successfuly, I was
forced to setup a fixed URI link in my application - which I did as
http
hi all
anyone have experience about vps
which one is better?
xen vs virtual-box
thank you
__
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list
xen is for enterprise, virtualbox is for home based virtualization.
I can recommend you to try virt-manager + kvm in fedora 11 or rawhide.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:08 AM, ann kokoiyan...@yahoo.ca wrote:
hi all
anyone have experience about vps
which one is better?
xen vs virtual-box
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 15:52 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
I just installed VirtualBox onto an f10 system and was amazed at how
easily/completely it was done, including setting up the user and
appropriate devices.
Yup,
1. Make sure rpmfusion repos are installed on system
2. If you have PAE
I like your enthusiasm, guys, but it's not that easy... what was this can't
create COM object msg when I installed from RPMFusion?!
The easiest way to do it is to install the package from sun site with PAE
header and uninstall KVM...
2009/6/9 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
On
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
error: Failed dependencies:
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-2.6.29.4-75.fc10.i686.PAE = 2.1.4-2.fc10.4 is
needed by kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-PAE-2.1.4-2.fc10.4.i686
You're supposed to set up the RPM Fusion repository as documented on the web
page, then use yum install, not use rpm
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
The easiest way to do it is to install the package from sun site with PAE
header and uninstall KVM...
Why not just use KVM? It's the solution Fedora provides and recommends.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
because when I do have KVM I can't start virtual box...
error:
Failed to start the virtual machine Kids.
VirtualBox can't operate in VMX root mode. Please disable the KVM kernel
extension, recompile your kernel and reboot (VERR_VMX_IN_VMX_ROOT_MODE).
Result Code:
NS_ERROR_FAILURE
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Yoram
Halberstamyoram.halbers...@gmail.com wrote:
because when I do have KVM I can't start virtual box...
Do an eSearch with KVM VBox conflict to learn of possible issues
when using KVM and VBox simultaneously.
~af
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list
? What does KVM do?
2009/6/9 Aldo Foot luni...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Yoram
Halberstamyoram.halbers...@gmail.com wrote:
because when I do have KVM I can't start virtual box...
Do an eSearch with KVM VBox conflict to learn of possible issues
when using KVM and VBox
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
because when I do have KVM I can't start virtual box...
Because when you use KVM, you use KVM, not VirtualBox. They are 2 completely
different solutions to virtualization.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
Seriously, do I really loose out by not having KVM? What does KVM do?
It's an alternative to VirtualBox which is supported by the upstream kernel
without third-party modules and which just works in Fedora without
installing any third-party stuff. And it's completely Free
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Yoram
Halberstamyoram.halbers...@gmail.com wrote:
Errr... yeah I did, then what? It says it don't work though one guy suggest
unloading the module instead of removing it
Keep in mind that most people make suggestions based on their own
experiences, which are
Ok guys,
You'll have to excuse my inexperience, I'm pulling my hairs.
I uninstalled the rpm package (the one where I have to run the setup and had
kvm problem). I've tried to find the RPMFusion for PAE. I found
ok, was missing akmods and other bits. I did yum install akmods (woo-oo I'm
getting the hang of linux) and got a whole bunch of stuff with it...
rpm -ivh /home/yoram/Download/akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-2.fc10.i686.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-common = 2.1.4 is needed
2009/6/8 Yoram Halberstam yoram.halbers...@gmail.com:
ok, was missing akmods and other bits. I did yum install akmods (woo-oo I'm
getting the hang of linux) and got a whole bunch of stuff with it...
rpm -ivh /home/yoram/Download/akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.4-2.fc10.i686.rpm
error: Failed
2009/6/8 Yoram Halberstam yoram.halbers...@gmail.com:
Ok guys,
You'll have to excuse my inexperience, I'm pulling my hairs.
I uninstalled the rpm package (the one where I have to run the setup and had
kvm problem). I've tried to find the RPMFusion for PAE. I found
yum install akmod-VirtualBox-OSE works... well, it installs all the packages
and when I reboot does stuff.
Running VirtualBox I had an error message, so I tried as root and got the
following
WARNING: The vboxdrv kernel module is not loaded. Either there is no module
2009/6/8 Yoram Halberstam yoram.halbers...@gmail.com:
yum install akmod-VirtualBox-OSE works... well, it installs all the packages
and when I reboot does stuff.
Running VirtualBox I had an error message, so I tried as root and got the
following
WARNING: The vboxdrv
it says:
vboxdrv93896 0
Ok, if I need to go back to square one (the 4th email of this chain)... I
compiled the stuff and then I had
Failed to start the virtual machine Kids.
VirtualBox can't operate in VMX root mode. Please disable the KVM kernel
extension, recompile your
2009/6/8 Yoram Halberstam yoram.halbers...@gmail.com:
it says:
vboxdrv 93896 0
Ok, if I need to go back to square one (the 4th email of this chain)... I
compiled the stuff and then I had
Failed to start the virtual machine Kids.
VirtualBox can't operate in VMX root mode.
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
Hi,
I've tried, unsucessfully, to install Sun Virtual Box on my FC10. It's a bit
of a funny install where you have to install the package and then compile it
for your system... Very well, I'm not a Linux expert so I suspect it has to
do with virtualization in the kernel
:
Hi,
I've tried, unsucessfully, to install Sun Virtual Box on my FC10. It's a
bit
of a funny install where you have to install the package and then compile
it
for your system... Very well, I'm not a Linux expert so I suspect it has
to
do with virtualization in the kernel.
Hello, Yoram
On 6/8/2009 6:52 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
Hi,
I've tried, unsucessfully, to install Sun Virtual Box on my FC10. It's
a bit
of a funny install where you have to install the package and then
compile it
for your system... Very well, I'm not a Linux expert so I suspect
Hi,
I've tried, unsucessfully, to install Sun Virtual Box on my FC10. It's a bit
of a funny install where you have to install the package and then compile it
for your system... Very well, I'm not a Linux expert so I suspect it has to
do with virtualization in the kernel.
This was the link I
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
vboxdrv: version magic '2.6.27.24-170.2.68.fc10.i686 SMP mod_unload 686
4KSTACKS ' should be '2.6.27.24-170.2.68.fc10.i686.PAE SMP mod_unload 686
4KSTACKS '
You need kernel-PAE-devel, not kernel-devel.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 00:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
vboxdrv: version magic '2.6.27.24-170.2.68.fc10.i686 SMP mod_unload 686
4KSTACKS ' should be '2.6.27.24-170.2.68.fc10.i686.PAE SMP mod_unload 686
4KSTACKS '
Also, if you use the package in RPMFusion you don't
Jussi: I've tried this one... installing
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/10/x86_64/repoview/kmod-VirtualBox-OSE.htmlbut
it didn't work.
Kevin: I can compile now and install the hard disk from the GUI but when I
run it it says:
--
Failed to start the virtual machine Kids.
Yoram Halberstam wrote:
Jussi: I've tried this one... installing
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/10/x86_64/repoview/kmod-VirtualBox-OSE.htmlbut
it didn't work.
There too, you need the PAE one.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 16:08 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
Beware VirtualBox and USB access. It's flaky at best. I tried using
an
XP guest in VirtualBox to access an iTouch device and it kinda
worked
but would often throw usb errors which would stop my sync between
iTunes
and the iTouch.
I
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 16:08 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
Beware VirtualBox and USB access. It's flaky at best. I tried using
an
XP guest in VirtualBox to access an iTouch device and it kinda
worked
but would often throw usb errors which would stop my sync
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Slower, but it does work. I installed the 64bit FC10 in a virtual machine
on a 32 bit system
That's actually pure software emulation, not kqemu. You can't accelerate a
64-bit VM on a 32-bit host at all, not with kqemu nor with anything else.
And pure
Bill Davidsen wrote:
However, once the install is done, it isn't all that bad to use for simple
stuff, and even 50x slower is fast enough to see if things work. It was a
proof of concept, a friend did a Yellow Dog Linux install on the power
emulation. It's fast enough to compile a program 64
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Mike Cloaked wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
That said, AFAIK kqemu doesn't perform anywhere near as well as KVM,
also
because kernel code is still emulated entirely in software (there's an
experimental -kernel-kqemu option which tries to use kqemu also for
kernel-space
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Slower, but it does work. I installed the 64bit FC10 in a virtual machine
on a 32 bit system
That's actually pure software emulation, not kqemu. You can't accelerate a
64-bit VM on a 32-bit host at all, not with kqemu nor with anything else.
And pure software emulation is
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
Aldo Foot wrote:
I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
manageable in the surface.
A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
do things
Mike Cloaked wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
That said, AFAIK kqemu doesn't perform anywhere near as well as KVM, also
because kernel code is still emulated entirely in software (there's an
experimental -kernel-kqemu option which tries to use kqemu also for
kernel-space code, but all I ever got
2009/3/21 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Mike Cloaked wrote:
However the box I wanted to try this on does not have the hardware
virtualisation flags that are the first test in the documentation for
running KVM. The question I am unclear about is whether KVM can still be
used but give
On 3/22/09, Martín Marqués martin.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here I'm finding some problems with KVM. I have a AMD Athlon X2 64
but kvm module doesn't load:
# grep -c svm /proc/cpuinfo
2
# modprobe kvm-amd
FATAL: Error inserting kvm_amd
2009/3/22 Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com:
On 3/22/09, Martín Marqués martin.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here I'm finding some problems with KVM. I have a AMD Athlon X2 64
but kvm module doesn't load:
# grep -c svm /proc/cpuinfo
2
# modprobe kvm-amd
FATAL: Error inserting kvm_amd
Just ignore what I was asking. Very stupid question.
El día 22 de marzo de 2009 21:58, Martín Marqués
martin.marq...@gmail.com escribió:
2009/3/22 Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com:
On 3/22/09, Martín Marqués martin.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here I'm finding some problems with KVM. I have a
?
(not VirtualBox)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Virtual-Box-tp22626076p22634446.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Mike Burger wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
Aldo Foot wrote:
I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
manageable in the surface.
A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
do things like pass USB devices through to
Mike Cloaked wrote:
However the box I wanted to try this on does not have the hardware
virtualisation flags that are the first test in the documentation for
running KVM. The question I am unclear about is whether KVM can still be
used but give very slow performance, or does not having the vmx
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about. The thing is that I
can't find the virtualbox packages in the fedora repository. Does it
have some strange name?
And BTW, is there any good HowTo to get started with Virtual Box
Grab it from Sun's site ! Also checkout www.virtualbox.org !
ASD.
Martín Marqués wrote:
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about. The thing is that I
can't find the virtualbox packages in the fedora repository. Does
2009/3/20 Martín Marqués martin.marq...@gmail.com
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about. The thing is that I
can't find the virtualbox packages in the fedora repository. Does it
have some strange name?
And BTW
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:21:24PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about. The thing is that I
can't find the virtualbox packages in the fedora repository. Does it
have some strange name
2009/3/20 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:21:24PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about. The thing is that I
can't find the virtualbox packages in the fedora
On Friday 20 March 2009 17:18:21 Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:21:24PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about. The thing is that I
can't find the virtualbox packages
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
Aldo Foot wrote:
I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
manageable in the surface.
A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
do things like pass USB devices through to the virtual hardware
with VirtualBox than with anything
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
Aldo Foot wrote:
I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
manageable in the surface.
A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
do things like pass USB devices through to the virtual hardware
with
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Tom Horsley tom.hors...@att.net wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
Aldo Foot wrote:
I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
manageable in the surface.
A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
do things like pass
2009/3/20 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:21:24PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about. The thing is that I
can't find the virtualbox packages in the fedora
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
Aldo Foot wrote:
I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
manageable in the surface.
A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
do things like pass USB
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 06:43:40PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
2009/3/20 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:21:24PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
I'm trying to do some virtualization testing and I wanted to see
Virtual Box that everybody is talking alot about
On 3/20/09, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
To install from a CD or DVD ISO image that you have on your hard disk,
make sure you set its SELinux context properly:
su -c 'chcon -t virt_image_t /path/to/some-os-image.iso'
Is this really needed? Last time I installed an OS in a VM
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/20/09, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
To install from a CD or DVD ISO image that you have on your hard disk,
make sure you set its SELinux context properly:
su -c 'chcon -t virt_image_t
On 3/20/09, Aldo Foot luni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/20/09, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
To install from a CD or DVD ISO image that you have on your hard disk,
make sure you set its SELinux context properly:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/20/09, Aldo Foot luni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/20/09, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
To install from a CD or DVD ISO image that you have
On 3/20/09, Aldo Foot luni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/20/09, Aldo Foot luni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/20/09, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
To
61 matches
Mail list logo
