quite simply, if i have a running f9 system, can i configure and
build a new (relocatable, for convenience) kernel and just kexec over
to it? i've read the online info and it strongly suggests that it's
possible, but i can't believe it's that easy and i'd rather not try it
without someone
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quite simply, if i have a running f9 system, can i configure and
build a new (relocatable, for convenience) kernel and just kexec over
to it?
I believe the running system needs to have kexec support built
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quite simply, if i have a running f9 system, can i configure and
build a new (relocatable, for convenience) kernel and just kexec
over to it?
I believe the
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quite simply, if i have a running f9 system, can i configure
and build a new (relocatable, for convenience)
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) what are the *required* config options for building a new kernel
that you can kexec *to* from the current kernel?
I don't think there is anything magic at all required on the destination
kernel (other than
