: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1()(64bit) for package:
iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64
--- Package libnetfilter_conntrack.x86_64 0:0.0.100-1.fc11 set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1()(64bit
-3.0.8-1.fc11.i686
--- Package VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc.i586 0:3.0.10-1.fc11 set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-3.0.8-1.fc11.i686 from installed has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc = 3.0.8 is needed by
package akmod-VirtualBox
= 3.0.8 for package:
akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-3.0.8-1.fc11.i686
--- Package VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc.i586 0:3.0.10-1.fc11 set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
akmod-VirtualBox-OSE-3.0.8-1.fc11.i686 from installed has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc
On 10/19/2009 10:05 PM, xiao li wrote:
This is the detailed information about Missing Dependency when I built the
srpms.BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status
30; see root.log for more information.The attachment is the root.log.Please
do me a favour.Thanks.
You
This is the detailed information about Missing Dependency when I built the
srpms.BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status
30; see root.log for more information.The attachment is the root.log.Please
do me a favour.Thanks.
root.log
Description: Binary data
--
Fedora
On Monday 19 October 2009 09:05:44 pm xiao li wrote:
This is the detailed information about Missing Dependency when I built the
srpms.BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with
status 30; see root.log for more information.The attachment is the
root.log.Please do me
On 10/15/2009 10:53 PM, xiao li wrote:
Frist,thanks for your help.
I have expired all the repos before I submitted the problem.As you said,I
have executed the instruction to expire all the repos in the db.But the
problem existed all the same.Do you have another solutions? Thanks for your
reply.
Rencently,I changed the IP of my koji and regen-repo,but it shows missing
dependency.The root.log as follows,
redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-29.el5.noarch from build has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: perl(Getopt::Long) is needed by package
redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-29.el5.noarch (build
On 10/14/2009 03:57 AM, 李晓 wrote:
Rencently,I changed the IP of my koji and regen-repo,but it shows missing
dependency.The root.log as follows,
By default, repo regens use the --update option against the last active
repo. Because of this, old entries will persist. This is normally a
helpful
Hi, li xiao
Maybe this reason, chinese help can get from
http://jianlee.ylinux.org/Computer/Server/koji.html#sec27
在 2009-10-14三的 12:23 -0400，Mike McLean写道：
On 10/14/2009 03:57 AM, 李晓 wrote:
Rencently,I changed the IP of my koji and regen-repo,but it shows missing
dependency.The root.log
and no index at all.
It took me a while to figure out that apparently the qt-doc had not been
installed. Installing qt-doc.noarch solved the problem.
Therefore I assume that this is a missing dependency of qt4-devel,
which comes with the assistant-qt4, but not automatically with the necessary
: no contents and no index at all.
It took me a while to figure out that apparently the qt-doc had not been
installed. Installing qt-doc.noarch solved the problem.
Therefore I assume that this is a missing dependency of qt4-devel,
which comes with the assistant-qt4, but not automatically
to figure out that apparently the qt-doc had not been
installed. Installing qt-doc.noarch solved the problem.
Therefore I assume that this is a missing dependency of qt4-devel,
which comes with the assistant-qt4, but not automatically with the necessary
documentation to make the assistant work!
Rob
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: package unusable, missing dependency POE::Component::Pluggable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520431
Summary: package unusable, missing dependency
Greetings;
Trying to do tonights update which includes many MythTV packages, it fails
with:
21:53:35 : Error in Dependency Resolution
21:53:35 : Missing Dependency: php-process is needed by package
mythweb-0.21-21.fc10.i386 (rpmfusion-free-updates
Is this temporary or a bug?
Thanks
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:10:04 -0400, Kevin wrote:
I'd bugzilla it but I've never been able to figure out which
packages different things belong to.
Strong hint: Check out the Guide Tour in bugzilla, which explains it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?format=guidedproduct=Fedora
Hi all,
I've just come across this:
- Finished Dependency Resolution
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 from updates has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9.0.11 is needed by package
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 (updates)
I'd bugzilla it but I've never
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:49:37 -0700,
Mike Wright mike.wri...@mailinator.com wrote:
I'd bugzilla it but I've never been able to figure out which packages
different things belong to.
rpm -qi will tell you the source rpm the package comes from and that
is what component to use in bugzilla.
Le 31/07/2009 19:49, Mike Wright a écrit :
Hi all,
I've just come across this:
- Finished Dependency Resolution
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 from updates has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9.0.11 is needed by package
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:49:37 -0700
Mike Wright mike.wri...@mailinator.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've just come across this:
- Finished Dependency Resolution
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 from updates has depsolving
problems -- Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9.0.11 is needed
Remi Collet wrote:
Le 31/07/2009 19:49, Mike Wright a écrit :
updates has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9.0.11 is needed by package
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 (updates)
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.3 is now available in updates
Thanks for your help
Mike Wright-4 wrote:
Remi Collet wrote:
Le 31/07/2009 19:49, Mike Wright a écrit :
updates has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9.0.11 is needed by package
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 (updates)
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.3 is now available
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:30:29 -0700
stan gr...@q.com wrote:
yum update perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 yum_output 21
There is an error in the above statement. It should be either:
yum update perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 yum_output 21
or
yum update
On 09-07-31 13:56:45, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:49:37 -0700,
Mike Wright mike.wri...@mailinator.com wrote:
I'd bugzilla it but I've never been able to figure out which
packages different things belong to.
rpm -qi will tell you the source rpm the package comes
On 09-07-31 16:11:43, Mike Wright wrote:
Remi Collet wrote:
Le 31/07/2009 19:49, Mike Wright a écrit :
updates has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9.0.11 is needed by
package perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.2.i386 (updates)
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-6.fc10.3
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 23:59:08 -0400,
Tony Nelson tonynel...@georgeanelson.com wrote:
On 09-07-31 13:56:45, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:49:37 -0700,
Mike Wright mike.wri...@mailinator.com wrote:
I'd bugzilla it but I've never been able to figure out which
On 07/31/2009 11:59 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-07-31 13:56:45, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:49:37 -0700,
Mike Wright mike.wri...@mailinator.com wrote:
I'd bugzilla it but I've never been able to figure out which
packages different things belong to.
rpm -qi will
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492318
Ian Chapman packa...@amiga-hardware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:06:59 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:05:25 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:13:52 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-27 14:25:43 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-27 14:25:39 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-27 14:25:48 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: missing dependency on perl(Email::Date::Format)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
Summary: missing dependency on perl(Email::Date::Format
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 18:21 -0700, Rich Emberson wrote:
Fedora 9
Yesterday and today I get while updating one of my machines:
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
Same here, though I'm running 32 bit.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686
On Sun, 10 May 2009 20:38:51 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 18:21 -0700, Rich Emberson wrote:
Fedora 9
Yesterday and today I get while updating one of my machines:
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
Same here, though I'm running 32 bit
, and wait
until the updated mplayer and xine packages become available.
Paolo
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Rich Emberson emberson.r...@gmail.comwrote:
Fedora 9
Yesterday and today I get while updating one of my machines:
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
Rich Emberson wrote:
Fedora 9
Yesterday and today I get while updating one of my machines:
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
Tracking issue here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481309
-- Rex
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list
Rex Dieter wrote:
Rich Emberson wrote:
Fedora 9
Yesterday and today I get while updating one of my machines:
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
Tracking issue here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481309
-- Re
Thanks for posting
Fedora 9
Yesterday and today I get while updating one of my machines:
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
On 64bit machine without mplayer:
# yum update
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package PyQt4.x86_64 0:4.4.4-6.fc9 set
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:54:04 +0200
From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: f10 failed to update perl for missing dependency
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
On Fri, 01 May 2009 14:40:58 -0400, vincent wrote:
Hello all,
I am running fedora 10 in HP laptop zv6000
On Fri, 01 May 2009 14:40:58 -0400, vincent wrote:
Hello all,
I am running fedora 10 in HP laptop zv6000, the last couple update were
incomplete because the dependency problem, the following is the message
that did show when try to update.
The message Dependency resolution failed a package
Hello all,
I am running fedora 10 in HP laptop zv6000, the last couple update were
incomplete because the dependency problem, the following is the message
that did show when try to update.
The message Dependency resolution failed a package could not be found
that allows the task to complete.
The
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492318
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-03-29 13:05:30 EDT ---
perl-GraphViz-2.03-3.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492318
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-03-29 13:05:24 EDT ---
perl-GraphViz-2.03-3.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Missing dependency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492318
Summary: Missing dependency
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Langdon Stevenson wrote:
Can you see anything wrong with what I have here? Is there any specific
info that I can provide which would help?
Try:
su -c yum clean metadata
and if that doesn't help:
su -c yum clean all
Hi Kevin, thanks for the reply. I have ended up
Langdon Stevenson wrote:
Can you see anything wrong with what I have here? Is there any specific
info that I can provide which would help?
Try:
su -c yum clean metadata
and if that doesn't help:
su -c yum clean all
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Langdon Stevenson wrote:
Can anyone suggest how I can troubleshoot this and resolve the issue? I
have found a few people had similar issues, but saw no solution suggested.
You need to include the F9 updates-newkey repo. Also make sure you're using
the Everything repo, not
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Langdon Stevenson wrote:
Error: Missing Dependency: libcrypto.so.6 is needed by package
php-mysql-5.2.6-2.fc8.i386 (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: libssl.so.6 is needed by package
6:kdebase-3.5.10-2.fc8.i386 (updates-newkey)
Error: Missing Dependency: perl
of Missing Dependency errors (see below). There
are so many that I can't just uninstall all of the applications (might
as well just do a clean install).
Can anyone suggest how I can troubleshoot this and resolve the issue? I
have found a few people had similar issues, but saw no solution
I decided it was time to bite the bullet and upgrade my workstation to
Fedora 9 from 8. I followed these instructions to upgrade using Yum:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq
However when I ran the command:
yum upgrade
I got a very long slew of Missing Dependency errors (see
Langdon Stevenson wrote:
Can anyone suggest how I can troubleshoot this and resolve the issue? I
have found a few people had similar issues, but saw no solution suggested.
You need to include the F9 updates-newkey repo. Also make sure you're using
the Everything repo, not the Fedora repo
Hi all.
I'm trying to build an rpm for lightsquid . I have got the rpm to build without
any issues but now when I try and install it, it dies with missing dependencies
the files are in the install list.
[r...@gregory-workstation ~]# rpm -i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481242
shrek-m shre...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: missing dependency - perl-Archive-Zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481242
Summary: missing dependency - perl-Archive-Zip
Product
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481242
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-01-23
01:44:16 EDT ---
perl-Archive-Zip is in RHEL-5.3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437461
Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
.fc10.noarch from updates has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: python-decorator is needed by package
python-fedora-0.3.7-1.fc10.noarch (updates)
Error: Missing Dependency: python-decorator is needed by package
python-fedora-0.3.7-1.fc10.noarch (updates)
As of Nov 29 - yum list available
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
python-fedora-0.3.7-1.fc10.noarch from updates has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: python-decorator is needed by package
python-fedora-0.3.7-1.fc10.noarch (updates)
Error: Missing Dependency: python-decorator is needed by package
python-fedora-0.3.7
On 12/13/2008 02:54 PM, Mail Lists wrote:
On 12/13/2008 02:07 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
What does yum repolist ; yum list python-decorator show?
I looked on mirrors.kernel.org for python-decorator in F9/F10 release
and updates - i can only find a python-decoratortools now .. maybe I
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:54:02 -0500, Mail wrote:
yum repolist; yum list python-decorator
Loaded plugins: changelog, refresh-packagekit
repo id repo namestatus
fedora Fedora 10 - i386 enabled :
2,220
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:05:57 -0500, Mail wrote:
On 12/13/2008 02:54 PM, Mail Lists wrote:
On 12/13/2008 02:07 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
What does yum repolist ; yum list python-decorator show?
I looked on mirrors.kernel.org for python-decorator in F9/F10 release
and updates -
In the Everything tree, in your case here, for example:
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/10/Everything/i386/os/Packages/python-decorator-2.2.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
You are right!! I missed it ... its working now after another yum clean
all ...
Thanks for your help.
--
-helper.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated
--- Package PackageKit.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from installed has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package gnome-packagekit
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:04:17 -0300, iarly wrote:
Try to download the dependence directly:
# yum install PackageKit-glib
and then
# yum install gnome-packagekit
Something like that won't help with broken dependencies. You show
that you've not understand the problem. Your suggestion
Armin Moradi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
When I try
yum install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:09 +0100, Vnpenguin wrote:
Hi,
I can't update FC10. Here is error:
You need this:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10
Richard.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
PROTECTED]wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:40:10 +, Paul wrote:
Dear All,
When I try
yum install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:28:07 -0300, iarly wrote:
This package is in testing.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10
No. It's still pending. Submitted for testing does not mean it is in the
updates-testing repo
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 11:19 +0100, Vnpenguin wrote:
I think Fedora's repos need that, not me personally :-)
Heh, you know what I mean :-) Should sync to the repo tonight.
Richard.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Ok, sorry.
I got it wrong.
Regards,
-
iarly selbir ( Ski0s )
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:28:07 -0300, iarly wrote:
This package is in testing.
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:44 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving
problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:09 +0100, Vnpenguin wrote:
Hi,
I can't update FC10. Here is error:
You need this:
PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
When I try
yum install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386
2008/12/9 Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I also am having problems with FC10 update and packagekit dependencies and
I don't use anything but
fedora, rpmfusion, and livna repos.
Yes. It has nothing to do with third-party repos. It was an
inconsistent set of updates that were pushed to the Fedora
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:03 +, Dave Cross wrote:
The problem will clear when the corrected RPMs get pushed to the repos
in the next couple of days.
Just waiting to be pushed:
Dear All,
When I try
yum install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:40:10 +
Paul Smith wrote:
yum install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
I see the same thing with yum update this morning. I suspect a mirror is not
yet completely updated so you might want to keep your shirt on for a bit and
try again later.
--
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:40:10 +, Paul wrote:
Dear All,
When I try
yum install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package gnome-packagekit
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
When I try
yum install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package
install gnome-packagekit
I get the following error:
gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by
package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed
Try to download the dependence directly:
# yum install PackageKit-glib
and then
# yum install gnome-packagekit
Regards,
-
iarly selbir ( Ski0s )
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:40:10
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:47:59 -0800, Aldo Foot wrote:
I'm trying to install xine-lib-extras, but I get an error.
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0 is needed by package
xine-lib-extras-1.1.15-1.fc8.i386 (updates-newkey)
Error: Missing Dependency: libcaca.so.0 is needed by package
xine
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 20:47, Aldo Foot wrote:
I'm trying to install xine-lib-extras, but I get an error.
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0 is needed by package
xine-lib-extras-1.1.15-1.fc8.i386 (updates-newkey)
Error: Missing Dependency: libcaca.so.0 is needed by package
xine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465417
Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
JeroenSt wrote:
When trying to install KDESDK in FC9 i get the error Missing dependency:
libexiv2.so.2 is needed by package libexiv2-0.1.6-4.fc9.i386 (installed)
The packes libexiv2 only installs libexiv2.so.3 and not libexiv2.so.2.
What can I do about this problem?
2 things:
1. run
When trying to install KDESDK in FC9 i get the error Missing dependency:
libexiv2.so.2 is needed by package libexiv2-0.1.6-4.fc9.i386 (installed)
The packes libexiv2 only installs libexiv2.so.3 and not libexiv2.so.2.
What can I do about this problem?
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JeroenSt wrote:
When trying to install KDESDK in FC9 i get the error Missing dependency:
libexiv2.so.2 is needed by package libexiv2-0.1.6-4.fc9.i386 (installed)
The packes libexiv2 only installs libexiv2.so.3
with Revisor. It has also been
reported elsewhere: https://fedorahosted.org/genome/ticket/28
The error is
Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package
glibc-2.8-3.i386
even though the updates.newkey repo clearly has the full set of
glibc-* packages at 2.8-8
Fedora Unity has just
also been
reported elsewhere: https://fedorahosted.org/genome/ticket/28
The error is
Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package
glibc-2.8-3.i386
even though the updates.newkey repo clearly has the full set of
glibc-* packages at 2.8-8
Fedora Unity has just released a Re-Spin
://fedorahosted.org/genome/ticket/28
The error is
Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package
glibc-2.8-3.i386
even though the updates.newkey repo clearly has the full set of
glibc-* packages at 2.8-8
Fedora Unity has just released a Re-Spin of Fedora 9 + updates, and we
have not seen
reported elsewhere: https://fedorahosted.org/genome/ticket/28
The error is
Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package
glibc-2.8-3.i386
Is there any other debug information available?
_something_ is pulling in glibc-2.8-3 instead of 2.8-8. That's what's
horking the issue
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:23 AM, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error is
Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package
glibc-2.8-3.i386
Is there any other debug information available?
_something_ is pulling in glibc-2.8-3 instead of 2.8-8. That's what's
horking
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Connie Sieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add
excludes=glibc*
to /etc/revisor/conf.d/revisor-f9-i386.conf in the [fedora] section.
(substitute x86_64 as needed)
thanks - I found the excludes in the manpage as well - that definitely
fixed it.
cheers,
m
--
The error is
Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package
glibc-2.8-3.i386
even though the updates.newkey repo clearly has the full set of
glibc-* packages at 2.8-8
The OLPC XS installer CD will be installed in many servers that are
disconnected or have a horrible internet
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
