Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-07 Thread Gordon Messmer
I've been pretty happy with my Dell Latitude E6400. I bought mine from their outlet store. If you go that way, look for one with Intel wireless rather than Dell wireless (Intel vs Broadcom chipset) and Intel or AMD video. The E6400 has a Core 2 Duo which is 64bit and supports hw

the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread Robert P. J. Day
(ok, not the ultimate, just really, really good since i don't want to break the bank.) i'm pondering a new laptop to replace my current gateway, and i'm wondering what a shopping list would look like if i went out hunting for a system that would be wildly compatible with the imminent fedora

Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread Tim
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 09:04 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: * video chipset? that's the choice that always scares me. Intel's got a reputation for supporting open source video, and just having to deal with bugs from time to time. NVidia for working closed source drivers, but abandoning older

Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread George Yanos
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote: (ok, not the ultimate, just really, really good since i don't want to break the bank.) ... * for me, as much screen res as is reasonably affordable ... For me it was also as much resolution as possible. But when I switched from a thinkpad t41p

Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread Jud Craft
 beyond the standard virt support, is it worth looking at IOMMU support?  (intel calls it VT-d, while AMD calls it AMD-Vi.  are laptops shipping with that feature these days?  is it immediately useful?) As for VT-d and AMD-Vi, I believe these -are- the standard hardware virtualization support.

Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009, Jud Craft wrote:  beyond the standard virt support, is it worth looking at IOMMU support?  (intel calls it VT-d, while AMD calls it AMD-Vi.  are laptops shipping with that feature these days?  is it immediately useful?) As for VT-d and AMD-Vi, I believe these -are-

Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 11/01/2009 09:04 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: * video chipset? that's the choice that always scares me. starting with f12, what would represent a safe bet? and it would be nice to have a laptop that would comfortably drive an HD TV. Big can of worms! If you trade off CPU power for video

Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:58:04 +1030, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Intel's got a reputation for supporting open source video, and just having to deal with bugs from time to time. NVidia for working closed Except for the recent GMA 500 based cards which were outsourced.

Re: the ultimate fedora laptop?

2009-11-01 Thread Jud Craft
 beyond the standard virt support, is it worth looking at IOMMU support?  (intel calls it VT-d, while AMD calls it AMD-Vi. Yes, that looks right. IOMMU -is- VT-d.  AIUI, standard HW virt support is AMD-V for AMD, and VT-x for intel.  above and beyond that, you have what *used* to be called