On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:06:24PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i was going to take what i thought was a couple minutes and update
my writeup on QEMU under fedora:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/QEMU
for fedora 9 but,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:11:42AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Axel Thimm wrote:
p.s. refresh my memory, axel, if you would -- are your AT packages
compatible with livna packages?
It often depends on the livna packager. Suffice it to say that I've
been a mirror for
i was going to take what i thought was a couple minutes and update
my writeup on QEMU under fedora:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/QEMU
for fedora 9 but, apparently, it's not going to be a simple s/8/9/g.
there doesn't appear to be a (livna) kqemu-kmdl package anymore;
instead,
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i was going to take what i thought was a couple minutes and update
my writeup on QEMU under fedora:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/QEMU
for fedora 9 but, apparently, it's not going to be a simple s/8/9/g.
there doesn't appear to be a (livna) kqemu-kmdl
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Phil Meyer wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i was going to take what i thought was a couple minutes and update
my writeup on QEMU under fedora:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/QEMU
for fedora 9 but, apparently, it's not going to be a simple s/8/9/g.
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:06:24PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i was going to take what i thought was a couple minutes and update
my writeup on QEMU under fedora:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/QEMU
for fedora 9 but, apparently, it's not going to be a simple s/8/9/g.
