On Saturday 11 October 2008 14:19, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:02:52 +
Marko Vojinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, you want a system with active selinux as much as a system
with file permissions. Security.
In general, I want a system where it is possible to get
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:02:52 +
Marko Vojinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, you want a system with active selinux as much as a system
with file permissions. Security.
Wrong Moose Breath! :-).
In general, I want a system where it is possible to get things done,
and all of the
On Saturday 11 October 2008 16:19, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:02:52 +
Marko Vojinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, you want a system with active selinux as much as a system
with file permissions. Security.
Wrong Moose Breath! :-).
In general, I want a system
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 18:30:00 +0200,
Nigel Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't agree with what Marko said. I'd hate to see the time when Selinux was
installed in enforcing mode, and impossible to disable it. I have left
Note that it is now possible to have permissive domains so
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 19:58, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
I was just trying to remove as many selinux related packages as possible
(a fedora 9 system) to avoid having to download their updates when I have
selinux turned off anyway.
[snip]
Several of the rpms I tried to
On 08/10/2008, Tom Horsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just trying to remove as many selinux related packages as possible
(a fedora 9 system) to avoid having to download their updates when I have
selinux turned off anyway.
Several of the rpms I tried to erase want to drag all kinds of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Horsley wrote:
I was just trying to remove as many selinux related packages as possible
(a fedora 9 system) to avoid having to download their updates when I have
selinux turned off anyway.
Several of the rpms I tried to erase want to drag
