Antti Aspinen wrote:
First of all, congratulations, packagekit-gnome is one of the most
useful package managers I've seen included with Fedora releases. It's
easy to use and fast. It is not buggy and it can be pretty reliable too.
But to make it even more better I have couple suggestions to
Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
it introduced a NetworkManager which prohibits networking.
NetworkMangler has been around since FC6 (at least), by making it the
default it became impossible to ignore. It does the right thing in
cases where you have one hardwire or wireless connection which
Mark Haney wrote:
I don't know if this is a bug in Tbird, or if it's just my system here
doing something funny with the display, but when I click 'View' -
'Headers' - 'All' I get the message headers, but they appear all the
way down to the bottom of the screen and there's no way to scroll
Hi to all,
I have some troubles about 3d rendering. My hardware:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile
915GM/GMS/910GML Express Graphics Controller (rev 04)
Software:
2.6.25.6-55.fc9.i686 (last kernel on F9).
Packages:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
sorry if this has been discussed before, my search turned up nothing
appropriate. I have a Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz system with 4GB of memory and
integrated Intel graphics (GMA 3000, system reports 82Q963/Q965
integrated graphics controller), running on the intel driver
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't recommend on
any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's installing now.
Perhaps in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/i386.newkey/fedora-release-notes-9.0.1-1.noarch.rpm
there
Dick Goldberg wrote:
Please remove my name from your mailing list. I am being inundated with
messages that have no value to me. Thank you
URGENT - Please comply promptly.
Move your eyes (and brain) a little down in this reply and you will see
how to do that... :)
Andrea
--
fedora-list
Hi,
I have a broken solid state disk, in facts badblocks has found about a
hundred of damaged blocks. The most shortcoming is that I have lost the
partition table too, and I suspect that some bad blocks are in relation
with the partition table data since testdisk can not write the recovered
Todd Denniston wrote:
Andrea Mastellone wrote, On 09/24/2008 11:12 AM:
Hi,
if I had less space (and no time to buy an extra USB hard drive) and
could translate the CHS to bytes/blocks of disk space, I would do
something like:
assume 512 blocks, and HeadSector size of 7697074bytes
bc
Todd Denniston wrote:
Andrea Mastellone wrote, On 09/24/2008 11:12 AM:
Hi,
I have a broken solid state disk, in facts badblocks has found about a
hundred of damaged blocks. The most shortcoming is that I have lost
the partition table too, and I suspect that some bad blocks are in
relation
10 matches
Mail list logo
