://konradm.fedorapeople.org/usernamelist.py
Results with FAS emails (in my $HOME on fedorapeople.org):
FAS-users-normalemails
or fedoraproject.org emails:
FAS-users-fedoraprojectemails
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list
On Thursday 10 December 2009 09:28:43 pm Conrad Meyer wrote:
A script that grabs the entries from FAS, and outputs everything as UTF-8
files:
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/usernamelist.py
I forgot to mention, this requires the 'python-fedora' package. (Doh!)
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer
On Sunday 06 December 2009 04:01:54 pm Robert Spanton wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 19:16 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
I'm experiencing trouble trying to get one of my packages (sdcc) to build
for Fedora 12. It builds on Fedora 11 and older (just double-checked in
mock). It seems to be some
code
for these other architectures -- chmodded 644, in %{_datadir} -- I don't even
know why brp-strip* dives into %{_datadir} anyway.
Thanks,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
release DVD on an up-to-date Fedora N-1 system
will replace newer versions of packages with older ones -- this is bad.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
to delete
everything the single user cares about.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
to disable ppc.
I've corrected that. Third try to kill the ppc deps should be the
charm.
Could we just not send emails tomorrow, double check that it produces the
correct result, and re-enable them for the next day? In case there's something
else we-shouldn't-have-missed-but-we-did?
--
Conrad
is sending includes x86_64, and I still get the 32-bit version
suggested.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Friday 30 October 2009 09:01:39 am Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
2009/7/14 Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu:
I intend to orphan the JRuby package and some of the dependencies I don't
believe anything else uses. It's a piece of software upstream really
doesn't intend to be packaged
of monitoring to refuse the values where they don't
look right. So there is no driver.
So this means there is no chance to get my thermal sensors working under
fedora?
Perhaps see if RPMFusion will carry the kmod.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
?
and also:
2) Should the autorequires/provides scripts die when they stumble across a
file file(1) errors on, or should they just assume it doesn't require or
provide anything?
Thanks,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
in? Or if not when will they be
reviewed?
Peter
Hi,
If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them
into dist-f12 provide over having them as updates? (Pushing updates is the
suggested approach unless there's some reason it won't work in your case.)
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer
is throw a malformed media file at it.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667095
Thanks,
Maybe http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/120454 .
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
it lands
properly you can have llvm, llvm-clang (the compiler) and
llvm-clang-analyzer installed by simply doing
yum install llvm-clang-analyzer
I might push this into F-11 too, once LLVM 2.6 comes out, if simply to
provide the analyzer to our F-11 users.
Please do :).
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer
On Sunday 09 August 2009 11:16:12 pm Markus Kesaromous wrote:
There is something seriously wrong with this kernel release.
Again -- the list you want is fedora-kernel-list, NOT fedora-devel-list.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel
option to disable the
TBB portions (but leave the fixes for the bugs) that we plan on using on
arches other than x86 and x86_64.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel
/Using_CVS_FAQ_for_package_maintainers
[3]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure
[4]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies
There is nothing wrong with starting at 9-5.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list
On Sunday 26 July 2009 07:50:14 pm Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 07/26/2009 01:52 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 26 July 2009 01:47:55 pm Richard Fearn wrote:
Hi,
I've just had an EL-5 branch created for my disktype[1] package. The
new branch is a copy of the devel branch, so the NVR
this, but I don't think it's a typo. In the rpm it gets evaluated as
Haskell editline library, I imagine.
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
because you get ghc-%{pkg_name} instead of %{pkg_name}.
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
been fruitless. As such, I've removed him from the FAS Packager group, too.
From reading the ticket[0], it looks like the Debian patch solves the issue --
I would like to take the package.
[0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439661
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
of packages
I'll orphan sometime in the next week or so:
- bytelist
- constantine
- jcodings
- jline
- jna-posix
- joni
- jvyamlb
If anyone wants any of them, let me know. (In case it's not obvious, they are
all java packages.)
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRineau
Erik, I'd like to join you as a co-maintainer if it is ok with you. A package
I maintain also requires par2cmdline (hellanzb).
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
swamped or ???
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
T: 403.875.4613
I was getting speeds in excess of a few megabytes a second on the Fedora 11
torrents, I'm not sure why you're having trouble.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:40:42 pm Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 10:23:05 pm Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Let me try an analogy: How do you handle defects/malfunctions with your
car?
Did a bunch of hobbyists from around the world build your car
immediately (EBADMETAPHOR).
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
. They decided to revert to 1.0.17
instead of waiting for 1.0.19 release.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
On Friday 30 January 2009 05:01:48 pm Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Friday 30 January 2009 04:20:30 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
alsa was demoted from 1.0.18 to 1.0.17 in the latest kernel
packages. Could someone explain why?
Thanks!
If you follow fedora-devel-list
with 128M of memory running F9 just fine, I just keep it at
runlevel 3. It works great.
--
Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
32 matches
Mail list logo
