On 01/06/2010 01:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
[or...@orca fedora/devel]$ ls */dead.package | wc -l
666
We're ok. The original number may have been 616:
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On 09/28/2009 10:27 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Robert Relyea rrel...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently there are also a half dozen features in mod_nss that aren't in
mod_ssl. SNI is definately something that would be welcomed in NSS, and
would probably be implemented
On 09/27/2009 07:17 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
I read the wiki page[1] on Fedora's effort to consolidate all the
crypto libraries. Quite an ambitious task! FWN [2] reported on the
rather large discussion back in '07,
On 09/26/2009 10:44 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I read the wiki page[1] on Fedora's effort to consolidate all the
crypto libraries. Quite an ambitious task! FWN [2] reported on the
rather large discussion back in '07, but I didn't see any resolution.
Is this still a goal for Fedora? The main wiki
On 09/01/2009 06:34 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 07:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The packaging style in the nss-softokn package continues to bug me.
There are RPM triggers being used to install/remove a prelink config file
whenever the prelink package gets
