On Jan 2, 2010, at 4:33 AM, Robert E. Martin, VCM Network wrote:
[...] Fedora has many advantages, but in its raw state it is not
very user friendly.
Actually, in its current state, it is very user friendly to those not
steeped in the One True Microsoft Way.
Except for system upgrades,
On 02/01/10 07:27, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 13:33:24 -0600,
--snipped--
I don't think you want to do this based on Fedora. The rate of change is
very high. Have you looked at Ubuntu LTS distros to see how those would
work for you intended market?
CentOS may also be
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 01:27 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 13:33:24 -0600,
The hurdle is that Linux usage is very foreign to the average consumer and
SMB. Linux is an entirely different system to navigate and administrate.
The layout, description and deployment of
4:20 AM
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Fedora Basic End User Rollout Support Operation
On 02/01/10 07:27, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 13:33:24 -0600,
--snipped--
I don't think you want to do this based on Fedora. The rate of change is
very high. Have you looked
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 05:09:21 -0700,
Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
Actually, I found these to be rather easy to handle when I set up my own
repositories using mrepo and each computer was installed via kickstart
which configured it to use the local repo(s) which also included
: www.vcmnetwork.com
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Wolff III [mailto:br...@wolff.to]
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 10:14 AM
To: Craig White
Cc: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
Subject: Re: Fedora Basic End User Rollout Support Operation
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010
On Sunday 03 January 2010 00:12:03 Robert E. Martin, VCM Network wrote:
I am somewhat confused. I thought that as an open sourced OS, it was a
free license, which included the applications in the repositories. What
am I missing?
You are missing the distinction between official Fedora
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 18:12:03 -0600,
Robert E. Martin, VCM Network rob...@vcmnetwork.com wrote:
I am somewhat confused. I thought that as an open sourced OS, it was a free
license, which included the applications in the repositories. What am I
missing?
Some things are supported by free
On 01/02/2010 02:19 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
missing --- no playing of .mp3 files and divx movies, among other things.
This extra functionality can be enabled by installing software from third
party repositories, such as rpmfusion and livna. But that also means that
legality and licensing
I understand.
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 19:19 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 03 January 2010 00:12:03 Robert E. Martin, VCM Network wrote:
I am somewhat confused. I thought that as an open sourced OS, it was a
free license, which included the applications in the repositories. What
On 01/02/2010 01:03 AM, Robert E. Martin, VCM Network wrote:
Members:
I have been seriously contemplating developing a business model that
is targeting expanding the use of Linux for the everyday desktop use
and in small to medium size business. I am not a computer geek or a
highly
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 13:33:24 -0600,
The hurdle is that Linux usage is very foreign to the average consumer and
SMB. Linux is an entirely different system to navigate and administrate.
The layout, description and deployment of applications is in whole different
paradigm. Fedora has many
12 matches
Mail list logo
