Re: SSD partitioning

2008-07-24 Thread Chris Snook
max bianco wrote: 2008/7/22 Rich Emberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: For a non-laptop machine with the following target characteristics: energy efficient, non-gaming, powerful and fast; should SSDs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive) be used and, if so, how? SSD have very fast seek times

Re: SSD partitioning

2008-07-23 Thread max bianco
2008/7/22 Rich Emberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For a non-laptop machine with the following target > characteristics: energy efficient, non-gaming, powerful > and fast; should SSDs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive) > be used and, if so, how? SSD have very fast seek times and > can hav

Re: SSD partitioning

2008-07-23 Thread Chris Snook
Rich Emberson wrote: For a non-laptop machine with the following target characteristics: energy efficient, non-gaming, powerful and fast; should SSDs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive) be used and, if so, how? SSD have very fast seek times and can have fast read speeds (http://www.d

Re: SSD partitioning

2008-07-22 Thread Tod Merley
2008/7/22 Rich Emberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For a non-laptop machine with the following target > characteristics: energy efficient, non-gaming, powerful > and fast; should SSDs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive) > be used and, if so, how? SSD have very fast seek times and > can hav

SSD partitioning

2008-07-22 Thread Rich Emberson
For a non-laptop machine with the following target characteristics: energy efficient, non-gaming, powerful and fast; should SSDs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive) be used and, if so, how? SSD have very fast seek times and can have fast read speeds (http://www.datamarck.com/benchmarks