-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/05/2010 12:10 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Alexander Kahl
ak...@imttechnologies.com wrote:
Actually I've started trying to package ccl as it is (AFAIK) the only
implementation besides sbcl supporting (all at once)
Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 09:37 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
I intend to give up the following packages:
preferences-menus
I'm a friend of nested menus, so I'm going to take it.
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Compose started at Wed Jan 6 08:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libefilterbar.so.0
autotrust-0.3.1-2.fc13.i686
Greetings folks,
I'm fishing for a package review for autotest-client (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548522). Autotest-client,
as the name suggests, contains the client-side portion of the autotest
scheduler currently in use by AutoQA [1]. As is custom, I can offer
review for
Hi,
When a Fedora user types poweroff or uses the GUI to shutdown the
computer, Fedora does not switch to the vt where the messages are being
displayed.
Is there a reason for this?
p.s. yes I bug reported this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533295
--
fedora-devel-list
Outage Notification - 2010-01-09 02:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2010-01-09 02:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-01-09 02:00 UTC'
Affected
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should ever take
keyboard focus away from that window.
Clearly I'm missing something, otherwise we
I'm currently packaging lessfs and there are apparently a couple
libraries that are a part of it that have become a cause for concern
by the reviewer (rightfully so) and I'm hoping someone could offer a
recommendation of how to go about packaging them.
Review Request:
A friendly reminder that the deadline for submitting new features and
spins for inclusion in Fedora 13 is Tuesday, January 26, 2010.
--Features: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy
--Spins: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process
Two weeks from the Feature Submission Deadline is
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM, nodata l...@nodata.co.uk wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever steal
focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell window, or
in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should ever take keyboard focus
away
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Alexander Kahl
ak...@imttechnologies.com wrote:
Thanks for the offer; currently I'm busy with getting GNUnet through the
review, ccl can be next on the list but I'm unsure whether it wouldn't
be better if we'd focus on packaging most commonly used CL libs like
Le 06/01/2010 16:20, Adam Miller a écrit :
I'm pretty sure there are a number of window managers that will do
this, and metacity might even have this option but just doesn't do it
by default.
-AdamM
If i remember well, focus stealing prevention was a Fedora Core 4/GNOME
2.10 feature (bz
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should ever take
keyboard focus away from that
On 06/01/2010 15:43, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
If i remember well, focus stealing prevention was a Fedora Core 4/GNOME
2.10 feature (bz #138453) .
I think t's still enabled by default in Metacity, but maybe there are
some regressions.
Works here, but only if desktop effects are not enabled.
-Phil
On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should
Le 06/01/2010 17:19, Philip Heron a écrit :
On 06/01/2010 15:43, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
If i remember well, focus stealing prevention was a Fedora Core 4/GNOME
2.10 feature (bz #138453) .
I think t's still enabled by default in Metacity, but maybe there are
some regressions.
Works here, but
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:57:14 +, Adam wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 12:16 -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Well, I think a reasonable alternative would be to add those policies to
the AutoQA infrastructure, and if the package fails the check, it
doesn't get tagged and the packager gets
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, nodata l...@nodata.co.uk wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever steal
focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell window, or
in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should ever take keyboard focus
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 10:07:58 am Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word processor, or an
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:57:14PM +, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 12:16 -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Well, I think a reasonable alternative would be to add those policies to
the AutoQA infrastructure, and if the package fails the check, it
doesn't get tagged and
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
PGA.
Here's the challenge. To reply to this mail, I hit control-shift-r in
one evo window, and evo opened a new window for me to compose into. Get
it? I typed into one window, and then
On 06/01/10 17:00, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
PGA.
Here's the challenge. To reply to this mail, I hit control-shift-r in
one evo window, and evo opened a new window for me to compose into. Get
it? I
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:00 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
Now make that work for the (not uncommon) case of clicking a link in evo
or control-clicking one in gnome-terminal and expecting firefox to pop
forward with that page.
That suggestion also fails for the PolicyKit dialog, and anything
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
PGA.
Here's the challenge. To reply to this mail, I hit control-shift-r in
one evo window, and evo opened a new window for me to compose into.
hey guys i'm hoping to package gerix-wifi-cracker-ng(1) for fedora and i'm
looking for someone who i can look to for help if i need it, is there a list
of names i can look to? or what is the reccomended path?
tia
phil
(1)
http://www.backtrack.it/~emgent/hackstuff/old_gerix_wifi_cracker_ng/
--
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:27 AM, psmith psm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
hey guys i'm hoping to package gerix-wifi-cracker-ng(1) for fedora and i'm
looking for someone who i can look to for help if i need it, is there a list
of names i can look to? or what is the reccomended path?
tia
phil
On 01/04/2010 05:29 PM, Jerry James wrote:
One of the first issues we'll have to face is the use of
common-lisp-controller.
First, it postpones compilation to the first time the application is
executed by a particular Common Lisp engine. For the application I
packaged, PVS [2], compilation
ons 2010-01-06 klockan 17:38 +0100 skrev Haïkel Guémar:
D-E enables either compiz or gnome-shell since F-12, the first one is a
different windows manager, the second is based on Mutter a fork of
Metacity (therefore, focus stealing prevention should work).
I've considered suggesting that
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I'd go with don't let a different app steal focus. Windows for the
same currently focused app are allowed to. This works pretty well
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I'd go with don't let a different app steal focus. Windows for the
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I'd go with don't let a different app steal focus. Windows for the
same currently focused
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:35:03 -0600
Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, exactly. You're saying that
1. there are cases where you want a window to pop up
2. it's too complicated to figure out which windows should
pop up 3. so windows should always pop up, no point being
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:27:07PM -0500, Fulko Hew wrote:
I'd say... only take focus if its a child/creation of the window currently
in focus.
You don't want ssh passphrase windows to take focus?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
jjames:BADSOURCE:jcip-annotations-src.jar:jcip-annotations
Upstream uploaded a new jar. This is the difference between the old
jar and the new jar:
diff -durN old/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF new/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
---
On 01/06/2010 06:50 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:27:07PM -0500, Fulko Hew wrote:
I'd say... only take focus if its a child/creation of the window currently
in focus.
You don't want ssh passphrase windows to take focus?
Hell, no! :-)
Andrew.
--
Quoting Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:35:03 -0600
Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, exactly. You're saying that
1. there are cases where you want a window to pop up
2. it's too complicated to figure out which windows should
pop up 3. so
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
jcollie:BADURL:spandsp-0.0.5pre4.tgz:spandsp
I haven't checked out any of my other packages, but this one stuck
out... Are you sure that you are checking the devel branch? The
tarball in the devel branch should be
Argh.
It looks like some or all of the spec files in this run were from an
old checkout I had instead of the new one. ;(
I'm going to run a clean checkout and re-run the checker now, so expect
a more up to date output in a few days. ;(
Sorry about this folks.
kevin
signature.asc
Kevin, you claim the check is done against latest devel tree but I see
few fairly archaic package versions .. like
rvokal:BADURL:wireshark-1.1.1.tar.gz:wireshark
Dne 6.1.2010 19:38, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
This sourcecheck script
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:35 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
There is no case where I want a new window or popup to take focus. Makes
for an easy algorithm. (hitting r in mutt is not a problem
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:27 -0500, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
There is no case where _you_ want this, sure.
I'd say... only take focus if its a child/creation of the window
currently in focus.
creation of is not something
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result in
a download of the source. This could be any of: URL changed, version
changed and URL wasn't updated, Site is down,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result in
a download of the source. This could be any of:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:35 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
There is no case where I want a new window or popup to take focus.
Makes
for an
Argh.
It looks like some or all of the spec files in this run were from an
old checkout I had instead of the new one. ;(
I'm going to run a clean checkout and re-run the checker now, so expect
a more up to date output in a few days. ;(
Sorry about this folks. Please wait for the new
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
SNIP
maxamillion:BADURL:firestarter-1.0.3.tar.gz:firestarter
SNIP
This package has been retired.
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/firestarter/devel/
... the other one I will be taking care of shortly :)
-AdamM
--
On 1/6/10 1:41 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 17:32 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
I'd go with don't let a different app steal focus. Windows for the
same currently focused app are
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
till:BADURL:dsmidiwifi-v1.01a.tgz:dsmidiwifi
this seems to be now on google, I'll have to fix it.
till:BADURL:john-1.7.0.2.tar.bz2:john
I'll work on that later, too. After an update the old version was
removed afaics.
On 01/06/2010 09:24 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result in
a download of the source. This could be any of: URL changed, version
On 01/06/2010 01:27 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
mailto:a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com mailto:a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:24:17PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:27 -0500, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
There is no case where _you_ want this, sure.
I'd say... only take focus if its a child/creation
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:53:21 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, nodata l...@nodata.co.uk wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:59:06PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 01/06/2010 09:24 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result in
On 01/06/2010 03:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
How about making the gnome-panel give away its focus to the newly
created window? Within the gnome-panel, it should be pretty obvious
which actions should give away the focus and which should not. I do not
know, how easy to implement it is, though.
Am 2010-01-06 18:17, schrieb Matthew Booth:
On 06/01/10 17:00, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
PGA.
Here's the challenge. To reply to this mail, I hit control-shift-r in
one evo window, and evo opened a new
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should ever take
keyboard focus away from that
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:35 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com):
There is no case where I want a new window or popup to take focus. Makes
for an easy
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 15:29, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:59:06PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
See the logs [1], what really happened was that sourceforge replied
with 504 Gateway Time-out.
[1]
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On 01/06/2010 03:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
How about making the gnome-panel give away its focus to the newly
created window? Within the gnome-panel, it should be pretty obvious
which actions should give away the focus and which should
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:29:22PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
Before..
Source0:
http://download.sourceforge.net/usb-midi-fw/midisport-firmware-%{version}.tar.gz
After
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/usb-midi-fw/midisport-firmware/%{version}.tar.gz
For 1.2 as
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:29:22 -0500
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like some genius at sourceforge moved stuff to a different
host, with a different dir structure. If you go to the project pages,
you see all the tarballs have been moved.
Before..
Source0:
Am 2010-01-06 21:59, schrieb Owen Taylor:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
window, or in a word processor, or an e-mail, nothing should
[or...@orca fedora/devel]$ ls */dead.package | wc -l
666
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:12 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On 01/06/2010 03:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
How about making the gnome-panel give away its focus to the newly
created window? Within the gnome-panel, it should be pretty obvious
On 01/06/2010 01:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
[or...@orca fedora/devel]$ ls */dead.package | wc -l
666
We're ok. The original number may have been 616:
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
nodata writes:
Am 2010-01-06 18:17, schrieb Matthew Booth:
On 06/01/10 17:00, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 1/6/10 11:07 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
PGA.
Here's the challenge. To reply to this mail, I hit control-shift-r in
one evo window, and
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 23:04 +, Zing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:59:14 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
There is no case where I want a new window or popup to take focus. Makes
for an easy algorithm. (hitting r in mutt is not a problem :)
There is no case where _you_
Greetings.
I'd like to propose splitting out
the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo file into a
fedora-release-rawhide subpackage which is NOT installed by default or
shipped on the live media.
I wrote up this using the Feature template, but I don't guess it's
really that much of a feature:
gconftool-2 -s -t string /apps/metacity/general/focus_new_windows strict
To be useful - when that's set, new windows never take focus away from
a window that looks like a terminal window. (This is assuming the above
opens a new window. If it changes an existing window, then
On 10-01-06 17:54:10, Robert Relyea wrote:
On 01/06/2010 01:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
[or...@orca fedora/devel]$ ls */dead.package | wc -l
666
We're ok. The original number may have been 616:
http://www.csad.ox.ac.uk/POxy/beast616.htm
No, that's merely the most common correction by
Darren,
Many Thanks !
BR
Frederic
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.comwrote:
Changes are applied in DNS now.
See the included nslookup results.
[onekop...@theoks-net ~]$ nslookup be.fedoracommunity.org
Server: 208.67.222.222
Address:
Dear *,
As I use http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/ as repository for the packages I
create, I would need a little bit more space.
So is it possible to increase my quota ?
Thanks
Best Regards
Frederic ;)
--
-
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
As I use http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/ as repository for the packages I
create, I would need a little bit more space.
So is it possible to increase my quota ?
your quota has been increased.
-sv
Dear Seth,
Fine ;)
Thanks a lot.
BR
Frederic ;)
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Frederic Hornain wrote:
Dear *,
As I use http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/ as repository for the packages
I create, I would need a little bit
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon and Dennis are working on the mail man migration.
The major features include:
1) Getting virt_web into Fedora
2)
On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon and Dennis are working on the mail man migration.
The major features include:
1)
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon and Dennis are working on the mail man
On 01/06/2010 05:48 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:48 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/06/2010 05:35 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 10:35 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
What does everyone else have?
1) no frozen rawhide which requires faster composes
2) dist-git
3) A functioning message bus with services passing messages
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
What does everyone else have?
Getting hosted's load average to below 100 :) (I accidentally
mistyped hosted as hosed, a Freudian slip as to the current state of
affairs? :) )
I think that gitweb-caching will help a lot
I've had a couple of requests for this come up recently:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1196
It's unassigned at the moment. I'm fine with running it on fedorahosted
provided the following requirements get met.
1) It doesn't see high load. I have no idea how review board
Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
What does everyone else have?
1) no frozen rawhide which requires faster composes
2) dist-git
3) A functioning message bus with services passing messages
I think I know what you'd want from us on 2 and 3, can you think of
anything off hand
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone out there with experience and are inclined to get this in hosted?
Is this something that would be better on one of our collab servers or
does it actually have to integrate with hosted somehow?
No experience but
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
What does everyone else have?
1) no frozen rawhide which requires faster composes
2) dist-git
3) A functioning message bus with services passing messages
I think I know what you'd want from
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone out there with experience and are inclined to get this in hosted?
Is this something that would be better on one of our collab servers or
does it actually have to integrate
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 10:35 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
What does everyone else have?
1) no frozen rawhide which requires faster composes
2) dist-git
3) A functioning message bus with services passing messages
I have
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone out there with experience and are inclined to get this in hosted?
Is this something that would be
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon and Dennis are working on the mail man migration.
The major
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone out there with experience and are inclined to
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
So F13 is underway, we should get our list of F13 goals together. So what
would you like to see (and will be working on) for F13?
For example, I know Jon and Dennis
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike McGrath
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:09:56 -0600 (CST), Mike McGrath
mmcgr...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I'm interested in working on it with you -from the composing side as
well. I'm assuming I'm gonna need to read up a lot, is there a Fedora
reference page somewhere or
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
And it was fairly easy ;-) For those interested:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055
$ curl -I http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gpxe.spec
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:33:18 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.13 (Fedora)
Content-Type:
Jon Stanley wrote:
I think that gitweb-caching will help a lot here, I just need to
ping warthog9 and get him sponsored, packages built and in
epel-testing.
That and continuing to get the caching stuff pushed upstream would be
good. The discussion I've seen on the git list is generally
On 01/07/2010 12:34 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
And it was fairly easy ;-) For those interested:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055
$ curl -I http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gpxe.spec
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:33:18 GMT
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Jon Stanley wrote:
I think that gitweb-caching will help a lot here, I just need to
ping warthog9 and get him sponsored, packages built and in
epel-testing.
That and continuing to get the caching stuff pushed upstream would be
good. The
Mike McGrath wrote:
I was under the impression that gitweb-caching was a massive step away
from gitweb proper. Can anyone correct me on that?
It is, but John H. sent a patch series to the git list to try and get
his code into git proper, which would be the best of both worlds.
It's still being
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
I was under the impression that gitweb-caching was a massive step away
from gitweb proper. Can anyone correct me on that?
It is, but John H. sent a patch series to the git list to try and get
his code into git proper, which
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
