I believe you live in England. Does the BBC, who mainly developed
No - next door in Wales
Dirac, use Dirac for webcasting? Who are the associates who
participated in development. AI couldn't find any after a quick at
Google's.
The BBC uses flash primarily, and has previously used
On 10-01-08 00:21:56, Chris Smart wrote:
...
Dirac is based on wavelets, completely different technology. It's
also lossless, while Theora is not.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/projects/dirac/technology.shtml;
According to that reference, Dirac is a typical lossy encoding method.
The loss is
2010/1/9 Tony Nelson tonynel...@georgeanelson.com:
According to that reference, Dirac is a typical lossy encoding method.
The loss is introduced by the Quantization step, while the compression
comes from entropy-coding the quantized (decimated) data with
Arithmetic Coding.
Yes, that's with
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Chris Smart m...@christophersmart.com wrote:
However the website (and BBC site) say that it can employ lossless
compression:
Dirac has the capability of compressing high resolution files for
production, compression for broadcast content, and compression for
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:55:43 -0500
Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Chris Smart m...@christophersmart.com wrote:
However the website (and BBC site) say that it can employ lossless
compression:
Dirac has the capability of compressing high resolution
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
Theora is not lossless.
The BBC code is intended for lots of things - such as *production* where
you don't want loss.
I'm not saying that Dirac doesn't present advantages over Ogg Theora
but I believe that, since it's
On Friday 08 January 2010 05:29 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Because of DRM, it even seems unsure the BBC�itself will use it:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/22/bbc-drm-cory-doctorow
A very interesting read. Thank you
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought it might be a good idea to do just the opposite: remove
everything and reinstall, I reinstalled gnash. It works fine at
youtube but apparently needs the bad plugins. Not sure it's an
advantage over using the
2010/1/8 Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com:
Too many sites were not playing with gnash. So, I tried to install
flash-plugin.
First weird thing is that flash-plugin does not show as installed or
installable in package manager for GNOME.
If you're using 64bit, try the native 64bit plugin. If
Hi Marcel,
On Thursday 07 January 2010 10:59 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
# yum install libcurl.i686
This might be your problem. Try this instead,
# yum install libcurl
Transaction Check Error:
package libcurl-7.19.7-3.fc11.x86_64 (which is newer than
libcurl-7.19.7-2.fc12.i686) is already
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marcel,
On Thursday 07 January 2010 10:59 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
# yum install libcurl.i686
This might be your problem. Try this instead,
# yum install libcurl
This tells me that the the x86_version is
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Chris Smart m...@christophersmart.com wrote:
2010/1/8 Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com:
Too many sites were not playing with gnash. So, I tried to install
flash-plugin.
First weird thing is that flash-plugin does not show as installed or
installable in package
2010/1/8 Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com:
I checked a bit Wikipedia to understand the matter. It seems that Ogg
Theora is free and offers good quality streaming. Why then has Dirac
been developed?
Dirac is based on wavelets, completely different technology. It's also
lossless, while Theora is
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Suddenly, Flash at YouTube and elsewhere stopped playing. I cleaned
/tmp, checked if javascript was enabled, I installed some new flash
packages, but not devel and gnash, tried the former kernel(1), all to
no avail.
(1)
2010/1/7 Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com:
youtube but apparently needs the bad plugins. Not sure it's an
advantage over using the Abode plug-in...
It's free software I guess..
-c
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Chris Smart m...@christophersmart.com wrote:
2010/1/7 Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com:
youtube but apparently needs the bad plugins. Not sure it's an
advantage over using the Abode plug-in...
It's free software I guess..
Yeees... But have you seen the
2010/1/7 Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com:
Yeees... But have you seen the description for Gsretamer's bad plugins?
Sure, it's bad and crappy, but at least it's open source :-)
-c
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Mike Dwiggins m...@azdwiggins.com wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript disabled or I do not have the latest
version of
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript disabled or I do not have the latest
version of Flash.
I then downloaded and installed via rpm -Uvh
Aioanei Rares wrote:
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript disabled or I do not have the latest
version of Flash.
I then downloaded and
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 02:30 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
Aioanei Rares wrote:
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript disabled or I do not have
Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Mike Dwiggins m...@azdwiggins.com wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript disabled or I do not
Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 02:30 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
Aioanei Rares wrote:
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript disabled
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Mike Dwiggins m...@azdwiggins.com wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
Aioanei Rares wrote:
Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 02:30 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
Aioanei Rares wrote:
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message
stating
that I either
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
Aioanei Rares wrote:
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript disabled or I do not have the
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:11 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
see if the flash plug-in here: www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/
This reminds me I don't have Shockwave on my x86_64 system. Is there a
Shockwave plugin available for linux Firefox?
jon
--
fedora-list mailing list
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
Aioanei Rares wrote:
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11. I go into Firefox
3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid. I get a message stating
that I either have JavaScript
I am trying to run up new install of Fedora 11.
I go into Firefox 3.5.3-1.fc11 and attempt to run a YouTube vid.
I get a message stating
I had the same for a while.
there is a switch in preferences that tells firefox that the apps are
available.
and You've got to run the firefox plugins
29 matches
Mail list logo
