Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Praveen K Paladugu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #30 from IBM Bug Proxy 2009-09-24 08:39:38
EDT ---
Kevin, Yes, it is ok with me with many thanks to Srini and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #28 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-23
10:06:33 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Packag
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Praveen K Paladugu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #27 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-23
10:04:22 EDT ---
Looks good now. Approved for CVS.
--
Configure bugma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #26 from srinivas 2009-09-23
01:35:58 EDT ---
Implemented the suggested changes. The modified spec and the SRP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #25 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-17
01:12:10 EDT ---
Almost there. Final touch-ups:
1) All the init script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #24 from srinivas 2009-09-16
11:01:21 EDT ---
Changes implemented and the files are placed under
http://linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #23 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-14
18:43:54 EDT ---
Final Review:
1) The build doesn't use the standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #22 from srinivas 2009-09-10
11:57:27 EDT ---
sblim-sfcb version 1.3.4 had the following rpmlint errors:
rpmli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #21 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-03
09:18:01 EDT ---
Hey Emily,
Could you please find time to make the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #20 from IBM Bug Proxy 2009-07-29 16:24:17
EDT ---
Hi Matt and Praveen, I'm just back from vacation, apologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #19 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-07-24
16:57:49 EDT ---
If someone includes the above suggested changes, I wil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #18 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-07-21
08:54:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> To do so, we need to get s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #17 from Matt Domsch 2009-07-21 08:27:47
EDT ---
Can we get this reviewed and approved today? To build this p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Praveen K Paladugu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Matt Domsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #15 from Matt Domsch 2009-07-17 01:24:28
EDT ---
I built Emily's 1.3.4 package now. Yes, the plugins have mov
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Bug 466183 depends on bug 468287, which changed state.
Bug 468287 Summary: Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #14 from Matt Domsch 2009-07-15 15:53:17
EDT ---
Review item 3) is not applicable to plugins which are dlopen(
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #13 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-07-13
23:42:52 EDT ---
Review
## rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec
sblim-sfcb.spec:16:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #12 from IBM Bug Proxy 2009-07-02 16:37:39
EDT ---
Hi Praveen and Matt,
Try
Spec URL: http://ratliff.net/sfc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Praveen K Paladugu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Charles Rose changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-23 17:33:25 EDT ---
Package review #468287 cim-schema now block
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #8 from Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-23 17:22:57 EDT ---
Yes, I hadn't realized the sfcb Makefile was
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #7 from Emily Ratliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-23 16:27:57 EDT
---
Thanks for the review Matt. An updated sb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #6 from Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-23 16:17:02 EDT ---
Comparing with openSUSE, they use a shared c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-10 16:31:03 EDT ---
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-10 12:34:22 EDT ---
upon reflection, you won't need a conf file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #3 from Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-09 15:30:51 EDT ---
Emily, thank you for packaging this up.
> e
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #2 from Emily Ratliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-09 12:12:14 EDT
---
Some updates based on comments from Srini
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183
--- Comment #1 from Emily Ratliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-08 18:14:47 EDT
---
$ rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec
0 packages and
40 matches
Mail list logo
