[Bug 241761] Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 02:14 EST --- BTW, you forgot to set the fedora-cvs flag. Fortunately I have CVS admin privs so I can take care of this. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 240287] Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240287 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 02:53 EST --- So imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Bug 240373 depends on bug 240287, which changed state. Bug 240287 Summary: Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240287 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||243501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||240373 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 02:59 EST --- Spent some time tonight and figured out the issue with x86-64 compiling under Fedora. The package glibc-devel.i386 needs to be made a dependency. I'll prep a new set of rpms based on cvs build (which has all the patches that I had in the rpm) Thanks for poking me on this one. My guess with autoreconf not being apart of build is because you really are not building the source when you do an autoreconf. You are rebuilding the config files to build the source. So being in %prep makes since from this stand point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 04:11 EST --- yea, I'm still here... but haven't had any time to work on this. But there's hope... Are you interested in helping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 04:46 EST --- Ok I rebased on latest CVS. http://jerone.googlepages.com/grub2-1.95-1.20070610cvs.fc7.src.rpm http://jerone.googlepages.com/grub2.spec http://jerone.googlepages.com/fedoragrub2packages One problem though .. I can't make glibc-devel.i386 a build requirement on x86-64. I could only put glibc-devel. It seems to install both when doing a yum install. Anyone have any idea how to specify an architecture package (that isn't the primary) as a Build Requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243538] ddclient 3.7.1 doesn't update dyndns account
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ddclient 3.7.1 doesn't update dyndns account https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243538 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: ddclient|ddclient 3.7.1 doesn't |3.7.1 - Doesn't update |update dyndns account |dyndns account | Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||il.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 04:48 EST --- I haven't used ddclient in a while, but when I did the update to 3.7.1, it worked fine for me on FC6 with dyndns. Attaching your configuration file here (with passwords and such masked/removed) could help. By the way, why did you choose to disable SSL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239165] Review Request: tcptraceroute - A traceroute implementation using TCP packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcptraceroute - A traceroute implementation using TCP packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239165 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 07:38 EST --- Changed the release http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/tcptraceroute.spec http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/tcptraceroute-1.5-0.1.beta7.fc7.src.rpm Will I have to do something about the libnet issue, if so, what? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243597] New: Inkscape does not launch on FC7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243597 Summary: Inkscape does not launch on FC7 Product: Fedora Core Version: f7 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: Inkscape package depends on gc package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.45.1-1.fc7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. install Inkscape 2. in Gnome, Select Graphics Inkscape Actual results: Launching Inkscape is visible in taskbar and disappears, Inkscape does not open. Expected results: Inkscape should open Additional info: ldd indicates a dependency of /usr/bin/inkscape on libgc.so.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 08:33 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tesseract Short Description: Raw OCR Engine Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243573] Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243573 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 08:37 EST --- Source RPM: W: python-memcached summary-ended-with-dot A Python memcached client library. W: python-memcached invalid-license Python * RPM name is OK * Source python-memcached-1.36.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK rpmlint of python-memcached: E: python-memcached non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/memcache.py 0644 W: python-memcached summary-ended-with-dot A Python memcached client library. W: python-memcached invalid-license Python Valid licenses defined in the rpmlint checks are 'Python license' and 'Python Software Foundation License' (/usr/share/rpmlint/TagsCheck.py) - Why the BuildRequires on python-setuptools? It uses distutils. - the PKG-INFO file in doc doesn't seem very useful to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 08:40 EST --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint-0.22.0-5.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images Well i cannot remove rpath without allowing to build icc_examin! As state is the previous comment.. This will lead to libcinepaintHalf.so.0 not found if cinepaint isn't alreay installed. That's mean it works without chrpath if thoses libs are present in ldpath (when cinepaint is already installed on the system for example). That's why i don't get build errors with icc_examin when i uses rpmbuild and patched libtool... Do you have advices to deal with this ? Oyranos isn't BR for this one but works fine... maybe we could add it later which will required an updates later if we enable it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243573] Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243573 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 09:03 EST --- Changes made, thanks. New version is: Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-memcached.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-memcached-1.36-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 09:23 EST --- Fails to build in mock on i386 (rawhide): configure: error: /usr/lib/pgsql//plpgsql.so|sl|dll is not found in the pkglibdir. Please specify the pkglibdir with --with-pgpkglibdir=dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 09:32 EST --- Still 404 errors... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 09:44 EST --- * RPM name is OK * Source libcgi-1.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libcgi-devel looks OK * rpmlint of libcgi looks OK * File list of libcgi looks OK Please consider comment #10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225346] Review Request: python-pgsql - Enhanced python interface to PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pgsql - Enhanced python interface to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225346 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 09:52 EST --- Thanks bunches! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 10:12 EST --- It fails to build in mock for me: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/mapnik-0.4.0-3.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/.sconsign -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236287] Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 10:22 EST --- * RPM name is OK * Source Genshi-0.4.1.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 10:47 EST --- The docs should be spun in a separate package IMHO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241971] Review Request: drawtiming - Generates digital signal timing diagrams from a textual description
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drawtiming - Generates digital signal timing diagrams from a textual description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241971 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 10:51 EST --- A few comments: - Replace ./configure with %configure. %configure sets the appropriate CFLAGS etc. look at the output of rpm --eval %configure - The smp_mflags are not needed in the %install section, compilation already happened - Duplicate BuildRequires: freetype-devel (by fontconfig-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243597] Inkscape does not launch on FC7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inkscape does not launch on FC7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Component|Package Review |inkscape AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243573] Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243573 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 10:54 EST --- Wow, that was fast :-) I don't see any further blocker, so this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 11:17 EST --- also unless a fortran numeric program depends on it the static bit should be killed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184080] Review Request: webmin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: webmin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 11:46 EST --- Kevin, I am working with the upstream maintainer Jamie Cammeron on the renewing of the spec file so it much more closely matches Fedora spec files. As information is presented to me I will update this request. Can this request be opened up again or am I going to need to start a new request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 11:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) also unless a fortran numeric program depends on it the static bit should be killed The static libraries have to stay, since there are no shared libraries for those functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210758] Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210758 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 11:50 EST --- i want to add this package Spec URL: http://mola.c100c.com/data/files/Spec%20file/aspell6-fa.spec SRPM URL: http://mola.c100c.com/data/files/Srpm/aspell6-fa-0.11-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 12:18 EST --- like i said, parallel building is broken (package doesent build with smpflags on a dual core box), but works fine without: gcc -Ikern -I./kern -I. -Iinclude -I./include -Wall -W -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -g -Os -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -falign-functions=1 -fno-stack-protector -fno-builtin -mrtd -mregparm=3 -m32 -MD -c -o kernel_img-kern_device.o kern/device.c util/grub-emu.c:41:31: error: grub_modules_init.h: No such file or directory util/grub-emu.c: In function 'main': util/grub-emu.c:188: warning: implicit declaration of function 'grub_init_all' util/grub-emu.c:211: warning: implicit declaration of function 'grub_fini_all' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222533] Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222533 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 12:18 EST --- REVIEW + source files match upstream. c83fd4b8b32ca84a4021e8afad6f9b64 grig-0.7.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. + license text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + no scriptlets required. + package installs properly. + rpmlint is silent. + only code, not content. - *.desktop file looks proper. category X-Fedora is obselete + documentation is small -- no -docs subpackage is necessary. Everything except this .desktop file is fine, please change it before posting to cvs. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222533] Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222533 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241079] Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 12:50 EST --- I added grub-emu back in and that does work with smpflags. Thanks! I've got new build up now removing the smp flags while compiling which should solve that problem. http://jerone.googlepages.com/grub2-1.95-2.20070610cvs.fc7.src.rpm http://jerone.googlepages.com/grub2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 13:19 EST --- What version of Fedora are you building for, current development/rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] New: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607 Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=gengetopt.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=gengetopt-2.19.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Gengetopt is a tool to generate C code to parse the command line arguments argc and argv that are part of every C or C++ program. The generated code uses the C library function getopt_long to perform the actual command line parsing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 13:21 EST --- but are they used by something and has this something been asked to use dynlinking instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 13:23 EST --- I have removed the 'export CC=gcc' part, and here are the new files: Here is the SPEC file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=corkscrew-4.spec Here is the SRPM file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=corkscrew-2.0-4.fc7.src.rpm I have also submitted a review request for GNU Gengetopt here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 13:24 EST --- I have submitted another review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 14:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) but are they used by something and has this something been asked to use dynlinking instead? Yes, it is used by several telepathy connection managers (idle gabble off the top of my head). And the reason it's static is that it's api is still changing as noted by the unstable name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 212984] Review Request: hunspell-ar - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ar - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |188268 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 14:32 EST --- I'll take ownership then of the post-import package, add add the appropriate OOo Requires to the langpack-ar and the additional kudus mentions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 212984] Review Request: hunspell-ar - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ar - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212984 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing
code for C programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 14:44 EST ---
REVIEW
==
+ source files match upstream.
b78cbb10356ce67d1d22436bce59dbdf gengetopt-2.19.1.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text included in package.
+ latest version is being packaged.
- it's recommended to fill dynamic sources like
Source0: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- build of SRPM fails:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/info/dir
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/info/dir
Also don't forget to include for textinfo
Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info
Please, correct those errors first.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 14:59 EST --- Hi, (In reply to comment #12) Fails to build in mock on i386 (rawhide): snip I already made a big progress on this package. I was waiting for 1.2.10 to be released (it will also include an init script, etc). Anyway, here is the new spec and SRPM: New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.9-2.fc7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 15:04 EST --- Yes, rawhide. It's using scons-0.97-2.fc8.noarch to build with -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219056] Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 15:19 EST --- - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. put \n between each entry in %changelog - description is not OK %description is too ample, rpmlint is complaining about summary-not-capitalized, but it's ok as it is the name of the software - permissions are not correct both iscsitarget.spec and iscsitarget-0.4.14.tar.gz are 777 /usr/share/doc/iscsitarget-0.4.14 is 644, but this is ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing
code for C programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 15:30 EST ---
Other points:
* Working directory on %build, %install stage
- is actually $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version}. So
please use simply . (dot) .
* macros
- Please check the defined macros on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros .
/usr/share is already defined as %_datadir
* Header files location
- Usually header files should be located under %_includedir, not
under %_datadir.
* parallel make
- parallel make failed by -j2. So please disable parallel
make with leaving comments
* Timestamps
- This package installs some files without any modification
on rebuild and keeping timestamps on those files is recommended.
For this package, it can be done by:
-
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=%{__install} -p
-
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 15:44 EST --- Unfortunately I've not even upgraded to Fedora 7 yet :-( I'll try and get around to reproducing this in the next few days, thought I'm a bit busy with my day job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 15:56 EST --- ping Damien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 15:56 EST --- Yeah, I can consider that I am reviewing it. But I am very open to somebody else doing the formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing
code for C programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 16:26 EST ---
build of SRPM fails:
...
[snip]
...
RPM build errors:
...
[snip]
...
Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info
Fixed.
* Working directory on %build, %install stage
Fixed.
* macros
Fixed.
* Header files location
There is no object file or library installed by the upstream tarball which would
correspond to the header file. So wouldn't putting them in %{_includedir} be
wrong? I have asked upstream about the purpose of these files, and waiting for
their reply.
* parallel make
Fixed.
* Timestamps
Fixed.
Here is the new SPEC file:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=gengetopt-2.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217735] Review Request: tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 16:27 EST --- I'm trying to contact upstream to see if there is a better place from where to download these sources. I'll post a new spec with all of the fixes once I get a better download URL. The static library is a 'stub' library. Even though it's a static .a library, it's really used to assist in dynamic linking, even across ABI changes. See http://wiki.tcl.tk/285 for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 16:35 EST --- Here is the new SRPM file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=gengetopt-2.19.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing
code for C programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 16:56 EST ---
If I'm reading how this program works correctly, the files in
%{_datadir}/%{name}*.[ch] are templates for the files that gengetopt creates. I
that's true then they're fine where they are.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 17:10 EST --- Hi Devrim, This package needs some major cleanup. I'll do a full review soon, but first a few remarks: - Adding postgresql-server and autoconf to the BuildRequires fixes a few errors during mockbuild. But why are you running autoconf after configure? I attached a patch which fixes building the docs as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 17:11 EST --- Created an attachment (id=156674) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=156674action=view) Fix building in rawhide mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 17:12 EST --- Anyone up to a a review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225345] Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225345 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |.org) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 17:34 EST --- Sorry for the delay, again. I swear it will be speedy from now on. :) http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/kodos.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/kodos-2.4.9-3.el5.wsg.src.rpm Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 17:40 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Short Description: The complete documentation solution for PHP Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: TIA! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 17:40 EST --- Hello, (In reply to comment #14) This package needs some major cleanup. I'll do a full review soon, Thanks -- and please let's wait until 1.2.10, which will have some more improvements in the spec file. but first a few remarks: - Adding postgresql-server and autoconf to the BuildRequires fixes a few errors during mockbuild. Uh, thanks... why are you running autoconf after configure? :-) It will disappear as of 1.2.10. The spec file I am currently using is the one that is used to build RPMs from CVS -- so autoconf is required there. As of 1.2.10, there will be two spec files in the Slony-I tarball, and one of them will be for Fedora packaging. I attached a patch which fixes building the docs as well. Thanks. I also committed these changes to the spec file in Slony-I CVS. I updated the spec file and SRPM at my website in order not to lose work: New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.9-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for
UNIX operating systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 18:08 EST ---
New version :
SPEC File : http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi.spec
SRPM :
http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi-0.77-0.2.20070527cvs.fc6.src.rpm
Changes:
Now package owns %{_includedir}/libelfsh/
Won't fix :
The guidelines say
- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package.
As this package doesn't contain any library file with a suffix I won't put so
files in the -devel package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 18:10 EST --- OOps I installed F7 during both builds SRPM : http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi-0.77-0.2.20070527cvs.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 240391] Review Request: testoob - Advanced unit testing framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: testoob - Advanced unit testing framework for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240391
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 18:10 EST ---
Attempted to chmod with:
%prep
%setup -q -n testoob-%{version}
chmod u+x src/testoob/compatibility/trace.py
But this does not seem to work, any ideas what I might be doing wrong? The chmod
executes and finds the file, but the resulting rpm still lacks the execute
permission.
Also, I'm not entirely sure how important this script is but considering it's
final destination (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/testoob/) should it be made
executable (or included) at all?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242566] Review Request: cegui (0.5.x branch) - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui (0.5.x branch) - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242566 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 18:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) Yes, you have to run rpmlint against the installed packages. I install all of the packages I test (into the mock chroot, a convenient hack) and run rpmlint on Yeah I knew you could use rpmlint against installed packages, but it never occurred to me that certain issues can only be picked up this way, I'd just assumed it was for convenience. =) Ok, well I've done a bit of research and this is how things stand. Neither undefined-non-weak-symbol or unused-direct-shlib-dependency are considered blockers. The first warning is caused by a library/exe not being explicitly linked with a library that contains those symbols. Sometimes that's actually desirable eg in the case where you have two libraries which provide a compatible ABI but their functionality may be different you can use either one, but generally it isn't. The peformance penalty for this tends to be a slightly longer startup time as the linker has to locate and satisfy those symbols. The second is caused by a library/exe being linked with a library for which it has no need to be. In other words, it's been linked with a library it doesn't use. I couldn't really find any useful pointers on this one which was quite surprising seeing as how many libraries in Fedora also have this issue. The penalty for this tends to be slightly bigger files and perhaps slightly more memory usage but we're only talking in the region of a few K at most. In order to try and fix this I tried to make use of the linker option --as-needed which I couldn't get to work. Additionally there's a good gentoo article on this issue (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml#doc_chap2) which explains you can often do more harm than good. Lastly it's not always possible for a build system to determine exactly which libraries it shouldn't link, particularly when querying .pc files etc. So in summary... the weak symbols issue has been fixed. The unused-direct-shlib-dependency hasn't because I don't feel it can fixed in any reasonable manner. Of course I completely happy to be proved wrong. Anyway, here's the latest version: Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/cegui-0.5.0b-2.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/cegui.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243631] New: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/msmtp.spec SRPM URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/msmtp-1.4.11-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: In the default mode, it transmits a mail to an SMTP server (for example at a free mail provider) which does the delivery. To use this program with your mail user agent (MUA), create a configuration file with your mail account(s) and tell your MUA to call msmtp instead of /usr/sbin/sendmail. Features include: * Sendmail compatible interface (command line options and exit codes). * Authentication methods PLAIN, LOGIN, CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, GSSAPI, and NTLM. * TLS/SSL both in SMTP-over-SSL mode and in STARTTLS mode. Full certificate trust checks can be performed. A client certificate can be sent. * Fast SMTP implementation using command pipelining. * Support for Internationalized Domain Names (IDN). * DSN (Delivery Status Notification) support. * RMQS (Remote Message Queue Starting) support (ETRN keyword). * IPv6 support. * Support for multiple accounts. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||177841
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 19:23 EST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Spec URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/msmtp.spec
SRPM URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/msmtp-1.4.11-1.fc7.src.rpm
...
This is my first package and I need a sponsor.
Wow! Nice work! (Honest)
Sadly I can't sponsor, I've set the bug to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR though, so
hopefully the right people will see it.
A couple of notes (I can't test build sorry):
- Download link should be altered, the standard at the moment for SF.net URLs
is:
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- Summary could do with a touchup
- Description should/could have a bit more about the program
- URL:http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/index.html could be changed to
URL:http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/ (Just in case they decide to use
index.php or something in the future, it's not important, but something to
consider)
Overall it seems fairly good standards wise.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 20:38 EST --- Ok, give me a call when 1.2.10 comes out :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 240391] Review Request: testoob - Advanced unit testing framework for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: testoob - Advanced unit testing framework for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240391
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 21:12 EST ---
Seems like distutils resets permissions. I added
chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/testoob/compatibility/trace.py
add the end of the %install section, and that worked.
It looks like the trace module is used by coverage.py, so I would leave it in
site-packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236287] Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 21:28 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-genshi Short Description: Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236287] Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 21:30 EST --- Boy, I'm really getting trigger-happy with the save changes button... Ruben, thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-genshi Short Description: Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184080] Review Request: webmin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: webmin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184080 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 23:22 EST --- Excellent to hear Scott. I would suggest you open a new request, since you are a new submitter of the package. Of course you should feel free to gain any info you can from this submission to make yours better! :) good luck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 23:30 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 23:33 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 23:39 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236287] Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 23:43 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||182235 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-11 00:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Do we actually have legal clearance here? No, becasue... And, perhaps more importantly, was there ever any response from Ralink? Not to the best of my knowledge. Blocking FE-Legal, but without *something* from Ralink, we're stuck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236287] Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-genshi - Toolkit for stream-based generation of output for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236287 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-11 00:42 EST --- Thanks everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218577] Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glump - A small web application to glue files from multiple sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218577 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-11 00:42 EST --- Thanks everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-11 01:14 EST --- Merci, Philippe ! The updated version - which includes a couple of fixes - is available at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/qfaxreader/qfaxreader.spec and http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/qfaxreader/qfaxreader-0.3.1-2.src.rpm Build logs and generated rpms for a couple of distros/archs are available under http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/qfaxreader/build %changelog - Requires: hicolor-icon-theme - Replaced some paths with macros - Use gtk-update-icon-cache to show up installed icons in GNOME menus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
