[Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 02:02 EST --- Hello, My vote is also for making it arch: New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha-1.1.0-4.fc7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic
circuit similators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 02:30 EST ---
MUSTFIX:
* Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS:
# rpmbuild ...
...
g++ -c -ggdb -pipe -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8
-I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D__WXGTK__ -pthread
-I/usr/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I. AppGSpiceUI.cpp -o obj/AppGSpiceUI.o
...
Also, next time, please provide URLs to the *.src.rpm.
It's very inconvenient for reviewers not being able to see the
%{version}-%{release}'s of a package under review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 02:51 EST --- Well, * What does df -k show? * If you have ~/.rpmmacros, what does it say? * And what does rpm --eval %_tmppath show? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247417] New: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=bouml.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=bouml-2.29-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: BOUML is a Unified Modeling Language editor for Qt. You can use it to create nearly all of UML diagrams. BOUML can generate code from those diagrams in C++, Java and IDL, and can also reverse existing code. The program supports class diagrams, sequence diagrams, collaboration diagrams, object diagrams, use case diagrams, component diagrams, state diagrams, activity diagrams, component diagrams and deployment diagrams. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 03:31 EST --- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec New SRPM http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.10-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 03:41 EST --- Rpmlint complains about the absense of any documentation in this package. However since there are separate upstream tarballs for reference and documentation (http://bouml.free.fr/download.html), I am planning to submit a separate -doc sub-package for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 03:41 EST --- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec New SRPM http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.10-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 03:51 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Callback Short Description: Object interface for function callbacks Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 04:34 EST --- Eh... sorry. The new files are here: http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann.spec http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann-2.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 04:43 EST --- SPEC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=gnome-password-generator-2.spec SRPM: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=gnome-password-generator-1.4-2.fc8.src.rpm I have rectified some issues, but keep getting errors in mock. Looks like there are some problems with 'Requires/BuildRequires', but can not figure out what is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226489] Merge Review: tftp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226489 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 04:57 EST --- Hi, please take a look at last version in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 05:02 EST ---
Mustfix:
- Please either disable building the static libs (Append --disable-static tp
%configure) or package the *.a's into a *-static sub-packages.
- Your buildroot doesn't comply to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines
Recommendation:
- I recommend to install this package's headers into a subdirectory of
%{_includedir} instead of directly installing them into %{_includedir}.
(Append --includedir=%{_includedir}/fann (or similar) to %configure)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to
keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 06:12 EST ---
Specs differ:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fedora]$ diff postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec
/usr/src/redhat/SPECS/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec
4c4
Name: postgresql-%{short_name}
---
Name: postgresql-pgpool-ha
6c6
Release: 4%{?dist}
---
Release: 2%{?dist}
13a14
BuildArch:noarch
49,55d49
* Mon Jul 9 2007 Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.0-4
- Made package arch, per bz review.
- Move ocf path back to datadir/ocf/resource.d .
* Thu Jul 5 2007 Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.0-3
- Fix ocf path
Using URLd spec builds fine, and rpmlint only complains about noarch, which is
fine, so I re-affirm my approval.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 06:18 EST --- Hi, (In reply to comment #30) Specs differ: Maybe you hit your browser's cache? It looks ok to me. Anyway, it's not that important. Using URLd spec builds fine, and rpmlint only complains about noarch, which is fine, so I re-affirm my approval. Thanks. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 06:20 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: postgresql-pgpool-ha Short Description: : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 06:48 EST --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 Meanwhile, you may be interested in reviewing the above packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 07:13 EST --- Sorry for a late answer. Well, apart from qmpdclient I packaged sonata - another mpd client. It appeared that sonata is much better mpd client for me so I am no longer interested in qmpdclient since I don't use it anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 08:16 EST --- If you look my my spec file you will see that i comment it for now. cause some option from RPM_OPT_FLAGS doesn't really work well. I'll upload the build log which honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 08:33 EST --- Imported and build. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 08:44 EST --- Fixed in: http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann.spec http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann-2.0.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246747] Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for
PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 09:23 EST ---
Here's my review, I'm not an official reviewer. Anything marked with a
indicates potential problems that may need to be addressed.
MUST Items:
* rpmlint - passes, no errors reported.
* Package naming is good. Uses same naming of upstream package with
postgresql prefix %{parent}-%{name}. Version is all numeric.
* Package name and spec file name match.
* The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- License is BSD, which corresponds to pgfoundry page. Actual source
distribution does not contain any Licensing attribution
- No license in source, so no need to include in %doc
- The spec file is written in American English, and is legible.
- Upstream source matches source in the RPM
- RPM builds on i386
- BuildRequires appears sane. The postgresql-devel will contain the
appropriate compiler requirements.
- Locales are not a problem as they are not supported.
* - ldconfig is called, however the .so files are not installed in the
system library search paths, so it appears that this step is redundant.
- Relocation not supported, so no special checks for that.
* - The package does not own the directory %{_datadir}/%{name}
- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly
in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
(http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that
those directories exist.
- No duplicate files noted, permissions appear correct, defattr is
present. Correct %clean section is present.
- Macro usage appears consistent.
- RPM contains code, not content, no need for a -doc subpackage.
- There are no dependencies on the %doc readme file.
- No header files or static libraries, so no need for a -devel package.
- rm -rf %buildroot is at the beginning of %install
- All filenames are be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
* - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
* - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
I do not have mock installed.. Not tested.
- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
- Only tested on i386
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as
described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
- Works well on i386
* - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
It seems to me that this extension might now work with postgres 8.3, 8.4,
9.0?? The following Requires appears overly broad...
Requires: postgresql-server = 8.1
* Consider adding the -p flag to the install commands for the sql and the
README file to preserve the original timestamps.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 09:30 EST --- Starting reviews of other packages, completed 246747 - postgresql-ip4r -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 09:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #32) Should it be running as user nobody? I have vague recollection of the rule that each process should be running as its own user. I'm just starting to read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry These changes appear more involved, and would require some time to get resolved. If possible I'd like to release with memcached running as user nobody for the moment, and then follow the correct process for adding users and registering a memcached user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 09:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #34) Starting reviews of other packages, completed 246747 - postgresql-ip4r Well, I checked your pre-review and it seems good for initial comments. (In reply to comment #35) (In reply to comment #32) Should it be running as user nobody? I have vague recollection of the rule that each process should be running as its own user. I'm just starting to read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry These changes appear more involved, and would require some time to get resolved. I don't recommend fedora-usermgmt (and I don't request you to use it or not to use it...) Okay. -- This package (memcached) is APPROVED by me -- Please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account If you want to push this package also on F-7, you also have to check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after the URL above. Matthias and Ruben, do you want to co-maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 10:01 EST --- good. This package (tgif) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 09:54 EST --- Imported and built. thanks to all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 10:05 EST --- Thank you! Request for CVS admin: --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name:tgif Short Description: 2-D drawling tool Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches:F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246747] Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for
PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 10:10 EST ---
Hello,
(In reply to comment #1)
- License is BSD, which corresponds to pgfoundry page. Actual source
distribution does not contain any Licensing attribution
Yeah, I bugged the developers about this.
* - ldconfig is called, however the .so files are not installed in the
system library search paths, so it appears that this step is redundant.
'k, removed.
* - The package does not own the directory %{_datadir}/%{name}
Ok, fixed.
* - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
There are no translations available.
* - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
No subpackage, so no need for this item.
It seems to me that this extension might now work with postgres 8.3, 8.4,
9.0?? The following Requires appears overly broad...
It may work, if one day those releases are out. I don't want to limit it to 8.2.
* Consider adding the -p flag to the install commands for the sql and the
README file to preserve the original timestamps.
Ok, done.
Thanks for the review.
Regards, Devrim
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 10:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) If you look my my spec file you will see that i comment it for now. cause some option from RPM_OPT_FLAGS doesn't really work well. What does doesn't work well mean in this context? I'll upload the build log which honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS I regret having to say this, but make this package build using RPM_OPT_FLAGS, or it won't have a future in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 10:45 EST --- Withdrawing approval and closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247467] New: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247467 Summary: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/isabella-coq/isabella-coq.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/isabella-coq/isabella-coq-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This day is the father's day and Isabella Coq must find a present to give to his father Coco. To complete this game, she must meet her friends and buy some things at the downtown. The most present is worth, the more points you get. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245951] Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 11:01 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: urlview Short Description: URL extractor/launcher Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247474] New: python-imaging package for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 Summary: python-imaging package for Fedora Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Change Request == Package Name: python-imaging [New Branches: ] [Updated Fedora Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Updated Fedora CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Updated EPEL Owners: ] [Updated EPEL CC: ] [Updated Description: ] Looking for package co-ownership in fedora. looked at some koji logs and saw that the package is owned by [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247474] python-imaging package for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: python-imaging package for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232555] Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232555 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 11:17 EST --- Closing bug report as this is already in F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225934] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 11:19 EST --- Closing bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225935] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246286] Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 11:31 EST --- Imported and built. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226555] Merge Review: xerces-j2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xerces-j2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226555 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 11:46 EST --- coco-coq-0.1-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247482] New: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/pwsafe/pwsafe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/pwsafe/pwsafe-0.2.0-0.1.sky.src.rpm Description: pwsafe is a unix commandline program that manages encrypted password databases. Comaptible with CounterPane's PasswordSafe Win32 program versions 2.x and 1.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245120] Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 11:49 EST --- libgsasl-0.2.18-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245120] Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version||0.2.18-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226553] Merge Review: xdoclet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 12:03 EST --- So, how do we proceed from here? I think all the technical and stylistic issues with this package's spec file are now all sorted out (if not, please let me know!). What do I need to do to wrap up this review process, get sponsored on the cvs and build machines, and move the new .rpm into live the extras area? Thanks, Alec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231303] Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 12:03 EST --- Closing as RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 12:05 EST --- Yay! (note just for competion: it took a note to rel-eng to tag -bignum and -random so that koji could build this without those two being stable) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 Bug 237338 depends on bug 237334, which changed state. Bug 237334 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225637] Merge Review: castor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: castor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225637 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 12:05 EST --- The latest version of the spec file is in Fedora cvs, I just tried that and it built fine. Please try that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 12:26 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libp11 Short Description: Library for using PKCS#11 modules Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Package Review |zlib --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 12:36 EST --- I've changed the component of this bug since I've discussed inclusion with the maintainer of zlib, and minizip will be incorporated into the zlib package. I'm not sure what else needs to be done to transfer the bug over to zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 12:45 EST --- I was wrong! (It happens) The FSF says: Section 6 of LGPLv2.1 says You must give prominent notice with each copy of the work that the Library is used in it So, when I read the fourth exception of FLTK's license, I think the first paragraph exempts the licensor from many of the requirements of section 6, and then the rest goes on to explain that they're not exempt from this particular requirement, perhaps a little more verbosely than is necessary. The example given is, sure enough, one way to comply with this requirement, though not the only way. It might be helpful to bear in mind that the original BSD advertising clause required you to publish an acknowledgment in advertisements, and not just the software itself. The example provided as a way to comply with FLTK's license -- a statement in the user documentation -- suggests to me that they do not intend to impose on your advertising. * Or, in very simple terms, fltk's license is GPL-Compatible. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 13:10 EST --- I've updated the spec file to use the /usr/lib/openssl/engines directory, thanks for catching that. This also has a fixed Source0 with the /files folder added to the URL. Lastly I included 0.9.6 in the OpenSSL requires, since that is when the engine support was added. The following spec file and srpm built cleanly on i386 and x86_64 and produce no errors with rpmlint. Spec URL: http://free.linux.hp.com/~mra/rpms/engine_pkcs11/engine_pkcs11.spec SRPM URL: http://free.linux.hp.com/~mra/rpms/engine_pkcs11/engine_pkcs11-0.1.3-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 13:19 EST --- This has been sitting around for far too long, and it looks as if the major issues detailed above have been fixed. I'll review this and emesene together and, if those reviews go well, I'll sponsor you. A warning, though, emesene might need some work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245951] Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 13:28 EST --- Okay, Thank you spot! - This package (cinepaint) is APPROVED by me - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 13:29 EST --- Ok, I disabled the test in err8.t New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async-0.94-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247474] python-imaging package for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: python-imaging package for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247513] New: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/junit4.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/junit4-4.3.1-1jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: JUnit is a regression testing framework written by Erich Gamma and Kent Beck. It is used by the developer who implements unit tests in Java. JUnit is Open Source Software, released under the IBM Public License and hosted on SourceForge. Additional Info: The reason I am proposing a new junit4 package rather than updating the junit3 package is because eclipse 3.3 requires junit 3 and 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 13:33 EST --- Okay, now we can restart this review request as fltk license issue is solved. So would you update the srpm again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||s.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 13:38 EST --- If you have some questions, please let us know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 13:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #40) It might be helpful to bear in mind that the original BSD advertising clause required you to publish an acknowledgment in advertisements, and not just the software itself. Ah... thank you for your explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages
encrypted password databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:01 EST ---
Good:
+ Packing Naming is ok.
+ Name of the SPEC File matches the package name
+ Package hast consitant macor usage.
+ Packsge contains %{?dist} tag
+ SPEC start to use GPL as an license
+ License is an open source license
+ License Tag matches with license test in the package
+ Package contains verbatim copy of the license text
+ Spec file is written in English
+ Tar ball matches with upstream
(md5sum: 4bb36538a2772ecbf1a542bc7d4746c0)
+ Package has correct buildroot
+ package doesn't contains subpackages.
+ Buildroot will cleaned on %clean section an on the beginning of the %install
section
+ Package conatins proper* %defattr and file permissions
+ %doc section is small
* %doc section doen't affect runtime
+ Package doesn't contains duplicates file in the %file section
+ Package doesn't contains files or directories owned by ohter packages
+ Local build works fine
+ Rpmlint quite on Source rpm.
+ Rpmlint quite on Debuginfo rpm.
+ Local install and uninstall works fine
+ Mock build works fine for Devel and F-7 (x86_64, i386, PPC64, PPC)
Bad:
- Rpmlint has complaints for the binary package:
pmlint pwsafe-0.2.0-0.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
W: pwsafe file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/pwsafe.1.gz
W: pwsafe incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.0-0.1.fc8 0.2.0-0.1.fc7
- When I call 'pwsafe --createdb' I will got the following message:
WARNING: pwsafe unable to use secure ram (need to be setuid root)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:04 EST --- package done :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247515] New: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-phar.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-phar-1.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-phar-build.log Description: This is the extension version of PEAR's PHP_Archive package. Support for zlib, bz2 and crc32 is achieved without any dependency other than the external zlib or bz2 extension. .phar files can be read using the phar stream, or with the Phar class. If the SPL extension is available, a Phar object can be used as an array to iterate over a phar's contents or to read files directly from the phar. Phar archives can be created using the streams API or with the Phar class, if the phar.readonly ini variable is set to false. Full support for MD5 and SHA1 signatures is possible. Signatures can be required if the ini variable phar.require_hash is set to true. When PECL extension hash is available then SHA-256 and SHA-512 signatures are supported as well. -- As this package requies php = 5.2.0, it will be only available in F = 7 Note : this spec use some new stuff for pecl extension : - register pecl extension (as pear extension) - run test in %check (at least, find a way to do this) The phar.phar command is a good phar example ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:15 EST --- Okay, getting closer. I've had my fedora account 'plindner' for quite a while now. I tried following the instructions here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure but it appears that I do now have the proper authority to do that yet. regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:16 EST ---
Alright, new spec and srpm in the same place as before. Added doxygen and
graphviz to the buildreqs.
Also, had to move --docdir for the package to not be %{name}-%{version}, since
that's where %doc will install to, and where %doc will delete before installing.
So you now get %{_docdir}/libxcb and %{_docdir}/libxcb-1.0. I guess that's
okay?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:27 EST --- According to the account system you have completed the CLA but haven't even applied for cvsextras access yet. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join specifically the Get Sponsored step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:38 EST --- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:33 EST --- It's fixed SPEC URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gconf-cleaner/gconf-cleaner.spec SRPMS URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gconf-cleaner/gconf-cleaner-0.0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 14:54 EST --- Rebuild on devel, F-7, FC-6, requested on Bodhi to push. Closing. Thank you for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 15:36 EST --- Hello, See configure file for this. You mean the PACKAGE_NAME? The tarball is slony1-1.2.10.tar.bz2, the upstream project is called Slony-I, and the first line of the README file says Slony-I. From the NamingGuidelines: When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. Missing yacc parser.y parser.c ? No idea what this means. yacc is provided by bison, and seems to be used by Slony-I: http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/ - Since postgresql_autodoc is now available, maybe you can add it to the BuildRequires I don't think so. Is there anything that depends on autodoc? configure is searching for it, so I assume it is used. Some people may skip doc builds. But doc is a separate package in Fedora, and people can just choose to not install it. Slony looks for /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_config first. If someone has a source installation of PostgreSQL, then the build will break This won't be a problem when the package is build on the Fedora buildservers. I understand that you want to maintain one upstream specfile for all versions of Red Hat and Fedora, but having a clean spec in Fedora makes things more easier in the long run. A few other comments: - Double BuildRequires for docbook-style-dsssl - Is %kerbdir still needed? If not, there's no need to change CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS and a simple %configure will do. And: rpmlint of postgresql-slony1-engine-docs: E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/support 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/adminguide 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/concept 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/howto 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs- 1.2.10/implementation 0644 Cheers, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]|fedora-review? |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 16:14 EST --- Sorry for the delay. Got an update here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libproj4.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libproj4-050319-2.src.rpm * Mon Jul 9 2007 - Orion Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 050319-2 - Move .so to main package and manual to -devel. Upstream makes no provision for a versioned soname. As I understand it, it is problematic to add one in case upstream decides on a different scheme later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 16:18 EST --- well, i uncommented the fix which make it honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. all files updated and are available from the link below http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/gspiceui * Tue Jul 04 2007 Xavier Lamien lxtnow[at]gmail.com - 0.8.90-2 - Enabled the fix that make it honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||247406 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 17:07 EST --- Added block dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz = 0.5.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz = 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||247408 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz = 0.5.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz = 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn||247405 OtherBugsDependingO|247408 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 17:08 EST --- Added block dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||247406 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|247406 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 17:22 EST --- Hello Kevin, Thanks for stepping up for the review and for spotting the issues with man and info! I'm on vacation now, so I'll be able to look into the issues you described in more detail when I'm back (22-Jul). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 17:28 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
- Provides: libglew-devel = %{version}-%{release}
Why do you need this ?
No good reason I can think of, gone.
- CFLAGS=-Iinclude $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
This will replace -Iinclude indeed - so you may need to have this in %prep (to
prevent CFLAGS replacement)
sed -i -e 's|$(POPT)|%{optflags}|' Makefile
I can't remember how the CFLAGS got in there in the first place, your fix seems
to work, applied.
- Prefer to use this at %prep (if possible for the doc generated before make)
sed -i 's/\r//' README.txt doc/*
Heh, I just advised the same to someone else in a different review. It isn't
necessary anymore, gone.
- doc sub-package isn't really big, you may consider to merge it with the
-devel
I'm not sure what the criteria is for splitting or not. As HTML documentation,
it really ought to require a web-browser.. Left as separate for now.
- make should uses %{?_smp_mflags} (it seems to work)
Done.
W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency
Don't know what to do about this, I added the extra BuildRequires anyway.
- Shouldn't we block FE-LEGAL for the sgi problem or is this clear enought for
you ?
It seems that if it is ok for debian then it ought to be ok for fedora. I'll
block FE-LEGAL if it is necessary to bring it to attention?
rpmlint complain about W: glew invalid-license Assorted licenses,
See previous comment, according to the debian document the license would be
something like BSD + GPL
Updated package:
http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/7/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/glew-1.4.0-2.fc7.src.rpm
http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/glew.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 17:34 EST --- srpm whine: link should be fc7 (works) not f7 (doesn't work) builds rpmlint clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 18:19 EST --- There's three changes that need to be made to the package: - Rpmlint isn't silent: W: compiz-bcop non-standard-group Application/Development The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving, Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases, Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering, Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia, Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System, Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers, Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System, Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support. E: compiz-bcop zero-length /usr/share/doc/compiz-bcop-0.1.3/ChangeLog E: compiz-bcop zero-length /usr/share/doc/compiz-bcop-0.1.3/README ** These two errors are OK W: compiz-bcop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/bcop.pc W: compiz-bcop non-standard-group Application/Development W: compiz-bcop incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.3-0.4.20070703git 0.1.3-0.5.20070708git.fc7 - /usr/share/bcop/ isn't owned by any package. - /usr/share/pkgconfig/bcop.pc must be moved to a devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
