[Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 03:10:04 EDT --- As rawhide and upstream change, new versions of spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/02/fence-agents.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/02/fence-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha4.fc11.src.rpm Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 03:08:36 EDT --- As rawhide and upstream change, new versions of spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/ras/02/resource-agents.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/ras/02/resource-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha4.fc11.src.rpm Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483933] Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483933
Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 03:20:25 EDT
---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
d2813439a0da9b048cc1793af05b2144 for both
N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang
N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Doc subpackage needed/used.
N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage.
N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
N/A - .la files are removed.
N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
../RPMS/i386/perl-autobox-2.55-1.i386.rpm
autobox.so
perl(autobox) = 2.55
perl-autobox = 2.55-1
=
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
perl = 0:5.008
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(Carp)
perl(Exporter)
perl(Scalar::Util)
perl(Scope::Guard)
perl(Storable)
perl(XSLoader)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
../RPMS/i386/perl-autobox-debuginfo-2.55-1.i386.rpm
autobox.so.debug
perl-autobox-debuginfo = 2.55-1
=
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
SHOULD Items:
OK, tested on x86_64 - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
FAIL - Should function as described.
# perl -Mautobox -e 'my $range = 10-to(1); print $range;'
Can't call method to without a package or object reference at -e line 1.
# perl -Mautobox -e 'print $error = 3.1415927-minus(22/7)-abs();'
Can't call method minus without a package or object reference at -e line 1.
No scriptlets - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)
Strange is that tests passed, but example from documentation not. But maybe I'm
doing something wrong. And it can be definitelly addressed as regular bug.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #44 from _pjp_ pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2009-02-06 03:56:49 EDT --- Provided what you say, consider to close this review request. Sure, will do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Bug 480724 depends on bug 480727, which changed state. Bug 480727 Summary: Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 _pjp_ pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #22 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-06 04:21:48 EDT --- OK... I think... I hope... I've managed (it would seem to get everything built successfully for devel F-9 and F-10. Everything is available in koji. under builds. However, under Tags I only see dist-9. I just want to make sure that I got everything right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483718] Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483718 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483723] Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483723 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #24 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-06 05:21:31 EDT --- Done. OK... I hope thats that... Wow.. Its a good thing to be able to contribute. But just a thought really... shuoldn't this process be a lot easier. I mean this should be go through a process to make sure you are who you say you are, then submit the appropriate files to the web interface and thats that. This process is way to convoluted. I feel like my head has been squeezed like a pimple. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 05:56:52 EDT --- Builds fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7656 Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287
--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-06
06:03:40 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: b9ddacd937a4f12f105242bf9b1fb7b5c62866cf
xconvers_0.8.3.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[!] Final provides and requires are sane.
= See issue 1
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji scratch disk
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: koji scratch disk
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Issues ===
1. There is a redundant Requires: gtk+. rpmbuild picks libgtk-1.2.so.0
automatically.
=== Final Notes ===
1. Please consider adding INSTALL=install -p to the make install line, in
order to preserve the timestamps of the pixmaps.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-06 06:09:12 EDT --- Nothing further, let's close it. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #6 from MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 06:55:27 EDT --- i change the name of rpm citation to gdesklet-citation rpmlint issue: _ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gdesklet-citation.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet- gdesklet-citation-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-radar-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-citation-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _ link: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-citation.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #14 from MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 07:04:46 EDT --- i have update the mail: bioinfornat...@gmail.com on my FAS account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: pdumpfs - |Review Request: pdumpfs - |Daily backup system similar |Daily backup system |to Plan9's dumpfs | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #29 from MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 07:19:57 EDT --- I change the name of rpm SlideShow to gdesklet-SlideShow rpmlint issue: _ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gdesklet-SlideShow.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _ http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-SlideShow.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 07:21:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xconvers.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xconvers-0.8.3-4.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 - Randall J. Berry d...@fedoraproject.org - 0.8.3-4 - edit spec per review - remove redundant require gtk+ - use INSTALL=install -p to preserve pixmap timestamps - use original png for icon to preserve original time stamp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #23 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 04:53:24 EDT --- Ok, now you have to fill in new package update in Bodhi for both F-9 and F-10 (not for rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 06:23:30 EDT --- You need -p1 not -p0 but still patch was bad - I reverted order for CMakeLists.txt. Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Patch URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid-ban-flags.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-02-06 05:43:01 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera Filter Wheels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807
Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-02-06 07:36:42
EDT ---
Can you please add a disttag (i.e. %{?dist})? As we'll also need this pushed
out to F9 and F10, it will make managing the Release tag much easier.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 07:46:27 EDT --- Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: vlgothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese TrueType fonts Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #12 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 07:51:50 EDT --- Ok, i see for building the ide-integration but emacs needs pymacs wich is not under Fedora but in the package, i made a subpackage emacs-pymacs or i drop emacs support from bicycle repair ? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-06 07:52:35 EDT --- No more blockers. package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 08:00:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/pango/mingw32-pango.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pango-1.22.1-4.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.22.1-4 - Requires pkgconfig. * Tue Jan 27 2009 Levente Farkas lfar...@lfarkas.org - 1.22.1-3 - Include license file in documentation section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 07:58:03 EDT --- This has now been built in Rawhide, F-10 and EL-5. Thanks for everybody's help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Bug 467420 depends on bug 467401, which changed state. Bug 467401 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 467420 depends on bug 467416, which changed state. Bug 467416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Bug 467419 depends on bug 467402, which changed state. Bug 467402 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Bug 467419 depends on bug 467416, which changed state. Bug 467416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera Filter Wheels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 08:05:35 EDT --- Ops, good point, I missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481544] Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544
Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-06
08:05:48 EDT ---
Build done and available in rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80541
Closing bug. (Will do F-10 and F-9 branches when perl-bioperl{-run} is
officially released}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Bug 467413 depends on bug 467396, which changed state. Bug 467396 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 467413 depends on bug 467405, which changed state. Bug 467405 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 08:03:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/fontconfig/mingw32-fontconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-7.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.6.0-7 - Requires pkgconfig. * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.6.0-6 - Use _smp_mflags. - Rebuild libtool configuration. - More BRs suggested by auto-buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438
--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 08:08:15
EDT ---
As Kevin Kofler mentioned in libfli review - please add %{?dist} tag to
release.
Koji build (dist-f11) - OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #20 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-06 08:26:41 EDT --- I just confirmed. The change you made did the trick. Since you already did this bit of work I should leave the urls that you provided as is. Is that correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #21 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-06 08:35:52 EDT --- I just confirmed. The change you made did the trick. Since you already did this bit of work I should leave the urls that you provided as is. Is that correct? However, 2 flags seem to persist. The flag of the UK and France. Also, after looking at the results, the language selector diaolog box becomes really ugly. More and more, I think this package belongs in a third party repo because of the country flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452
Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mefos...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mefos...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2009-02-06
08:49:26 EDT ---
Here's my stab at a review ...
Summary: there's a minor rpmlint issue with the SRPM and a need for more
details about where the source comes from, and a more confusing issue
regarding where the files should be installed.
I'm also not sure whether to care that the gcc invocations don't use
$RPM_OPT_FLAGS and that make doesn't use %{?_smp_mflags}.
Main packaging guidelines:
[-] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
% rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/java-gnome-4.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm
../RPMS/i386/java-gnome-*
java-gnome.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: java-gnome-4.0.6-jnipath.patch
A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the
patches
documentation to see what's wrong.
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If
no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source
URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Give a script or a command sequence for getting the given BZR snapshot
from the repository
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed
in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not
compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a
comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program
must run properly if it
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #26 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-06 08:55:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) You can match this #bz with updates in Bodhi. I'm not quite sure I follow this one. Is this done when I run make update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #22 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-06 08:57:31 EDT --- Ooop. I wrote to soon. All the flags are gone, replaced with question marks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 09:01:31 EDT --- Thanks for approving this. I have done an updated package which should fix everything you mentioned. I will proceed with the CVS request anyway. * Fri Feb 6 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.4.4-1 - Update to Fedora native version 1.4.4: . Remove potentially patented ECC support. . Do not abort when the fips mode kernel flag is inaccessible due to permissions (#470219). - For review (Michel Alexandre Salim): . Remove *.def file. . Make description clearer. . Distribute the license files. - The license for binaries is GPLv2+, so update the license field. - Add check section (disabled by default). - Why did we set PATH before configure? Removed. - Added BR mingw32-dlfcn suggested by auto-buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #23 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 09:05:48 EDT --- So something is wrong - there should be no flags at all! Flags are replaced with language code label. Try to restart Plasma to load new package. It's usable even without flags, only it doesn't look so visually appealing. My SPEC should be final one but depends on resolution of issues with question flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484359] New: Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Summary: Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.syl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gtksourcecompletion.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gtksourcecompletion-0.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GtkSourceCompletion is a code completion library for GtkSourceView. (needed as a dependency for vtg, Vala Tools for gedit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 09:04:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-libgcrypt Short Description: MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484360] New: Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Summary: Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.syl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/vtg.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/vtg-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Vala Toys for gEdit is an experimental collection of plugins that extends the gEdit editor to make it a better programmer editor for the Vala language. Vtg tries to make less compromises as possible so, for now, its scope is narrowed only to support Vala. It is written in Vala and it is currently composed of just one plugin with four modules: * Bracket completion module * Symbol completion module * Project Manager - based on the gnome build framework library * Project builder / executer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||484359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||484360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #27 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 09:15:51 EDT --- In Bodhi you can set bugzilla id and then this review is updated with current state of update and automatically closed once it hit stable repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483628] Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483628 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 09:14:29 EDT --- Build ok: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7653 Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: xgridloc - |Review Request: xgridloc - |A GTK+ application for the |An application for the |calculation of Maidenhead |calculation of Maidenhead |QRA Locators|QRA Locators --- Comment #1 from Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 09:38:05 EDT --- bump src to F11 Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xgridloc.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xgridloc-0.9-5.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' d...@fedoraproject.org - 0.9-5 - bump src to f11 - minor spec edits -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484374] New: Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 Summary: Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-uk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-uk-1.5.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ukrainian thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 09:55:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-openssl Short Description: MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484379] New: Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Summary: Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pala...@gmx.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/aurulent/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/aurulent/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Aurulent Sans is a sans-serif font developed for use as the primary interface font on X Windows on GNU/Linux. It includes the latin alphabet, digits, and punctuation, as well as some accents. It is created by Stephen G. Hartke. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-02-06 10:00:21 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-atk.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-atk-1.25.2-5.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-atk pkgconfig rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem = 46 mingw32-runtime mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libglib-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgobject-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libintl-8.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) $ rpmquery --provides mingw32-atk mingw32(libatk-1.0-0.dll) mingw32-atk = 1.25.2-4.fc11 $ rpmquery --fileprovide mingw32-atk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libatk-1.0-0.dll /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atk-enum-types.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atk.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkaction.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkcomponent.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkdocument.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkeditabletext.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkgobjectaccessible.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkhyperlink.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkhyperlinkimpl.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkhypertext.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkimage.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkmisc.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atknoopobject.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atknoopobjectfactory.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkobject.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkobjectfactory.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkregistry.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkrelation.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkrelationset.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkrelationtype.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkselection.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkstate.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkstateset.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkstreamablecontent.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atktable.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atktext.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkutil.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkvalue.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libatk-1.0.dll.a /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libatk-1.0.la /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/atk.pc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/am/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/b...@latin/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cy/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/dz/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo
[Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:06:10 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:04:22 EDT --- Okay. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:06:48 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 10:04:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-atk Short Description: MinGW Windows Atk library Owners: rjones berrange Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:07:22 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484374] Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484372] Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 10:21:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi-0.6-2.src.rpm I have filled a pair of bugs about library calling exit and the missing GPLv2 license. I'm using commands instead of macros now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 10:21:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/gtk2/mingw32-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-gtk2-2.15.0-3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.15.0-3 - Remove documentation. - Add license file. - Added extra BRs suggested by auto-buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(bl...@verdurin.co ||m) --- Comment #50 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:19:40 EDT --- Any good news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Bug 483438 depends on bug 482807, which changed state. Bug 482807 Summary: Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera Filter Wheels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mastah...@gmail.c ||om) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:21:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera Filter Wheels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 10:18:49 EDT --- I have added the tag and build the package in F-10 and F-9. I will update libindi ASAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 --- Comment #1 from John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org 2009-02-06 10:23:14 EDT --- I mis-typed the two URLs above. They should be: Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/perl-Sendmail-PMilter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/perl-Sendmail-PMilter-0.96-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521
Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mefos...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mefos...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 10:28:00
EDT ---
(Using Jason Tibbitts' review template from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/Review_Template)
[-] source files match upstream:
I followed the instructions in the spec file and ended up with
something with a different md5sum than the file in the SRPM. The
readme.txt and gpl.txt files do match though
You could just use the upstream .zip file directly, though. Just change
your %setup line to
%setup -q -c %{name}-%{version}
and it'll create the directory when it needs to.
[+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
[+] dist tag is present.
[+] build root is correct.
[+] license field matches the actual license.
[+] license is open source-compatible.
[+] license text included in package.
[-] latest version is being packaged.
It looks like upstream has released 0.12.5
[+] BuildRequires are proper.
[+] compiler flags are appropriate.
[+] %clean is present.
[-] package builds in mock.
error: %patch without corresponding Patch: tag
You should have %patch0, not %patch, on line 62
For the remainder of this review I made this change
[+] package installs properly.
[+] debuginfo package looks complete.
[-] rpmlint is silent.
One warning to deal with:
simplyhtml.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line
20)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic
annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
Other warnings are about Group tags or confusion with the gcj
noarch-ness
[+] final provides and requires are sane:
Provides:
simplyhtml-0.12.3.jar.so
simplyhtml = 0:0.12.3-2.fc10
simplyhtml(x86-32) = 0:0.12.3-2.fc10
Requires:
/bin/sh
gnu-regexp
java
java-gcj-compat = 1.0.31
javahelp2
jpackage-utils
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libdl.so.2
libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)
libgcj_bc.so.1
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
librt.so.1
libz.so.1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
[+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[+] owns the directories it creates.
[+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[+] no duplicates in %files.
[+] file permissions are appropriate.
[+] gcj scriplets are correct
[+] code, not content.
[+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
[+] no headers.
[+] no pkgconfig files.
[+] no libtool .la droppings.
[-] Package doesn't run
I recommend creating a small shell script to run the program with the
correct CLASSPATH -- if you just try to run the jar file, it doesn't
find the gnu-regexp classes.
Something like this:
#!/bin/sh
exec java -cp `build-classpath gnu-regexp javahelp2 simplyhtml` \
com.lightdev.app.shtm.App
[-] Other source files are included:
Please check the status and the necessity of using the files in
src/com/sun and de/calcom as they appear to come from other projects.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera Filter Wheels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 10:29:33 EDT --- Ok, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 10:32:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi-0.6-2.src.rpm I have filled a pair of bugs about library calling exit and the missing GPLv2 license. I'm using commands instead of macros now. Source RPM does not exist - 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484386] New: Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 Summary: Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: my...@yahoo.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri-2.12.18-1.src.rpm Summary: Gri is a language for scientific graphics programming. It is a command-driven application, as opposed to a click/point application. It is analogous to latex, and shares the property that extensive power is the reward for tolerating a modest learning curve. Gri output is in industry-standard PostScript, suitable for incorporation in documents prepared by various text processors. Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1109441 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint -iv ../RPMS/i386/gri-2.12.18-1.i386.rpm ../SRPMS/gri-2.12.18-1.src.rpm ./gri.spec gri.i386: I: checking gri.src: I: checking gri.src:39: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT libdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/gri $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. ./gri.spec:39: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT libdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/gri $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I think the warning about touching RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the build section is not a problem, as it is not being modified, just used to pass options to the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(dignan.patr...@gm ||ail.com) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:23:20 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(joseluisblan...@g ||mail.com) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:22:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Patrick Dignan dignan.patr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(dignan.patr...@gm | |ail.com)| --- Comment #14 from Patrick Dignan dignan.patr...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 10:47:12 EDT --- Sorry, I've been very busy with school work and applying for internships. I also need to see what should be done about the config files. The default config file requires a number of programs, and uses absolute paths to them, so I'm going through and seeing which are common programs, and using sed to replace the paths with whatever %bindir (for example) is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:54:45 EDT --- Okay, now this package itself is good. So: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check No one is reviewing) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 10:56:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi-0.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Upss! the dist tag was missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ita...@ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-02-06 06:30:55 EDT --- Ralf you can remove FE-LEGAL http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-November/msg00023.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-06 10:59:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Created an attachment (id=331051) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331051) [details] Adds a cloog-config.h file to the distribution Seems good. (In reply to comment #19) This library actually calls exit() in the library (e.g. source/names.c). This is unusual situation. Usually when some unexpected behavior happens in a function in a library, the function should return a value which tells the error or so and should call exit() ($ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit shows the explanation). Would you contact upstream? Yes, sure. Though is this a blocker for the package to be sponsored ? Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #25 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 06:02:25 EDT --- You can match this #bz with updates in Bodhi. Yes, the process is really complicated but many steps are only one time. But this is not a good place to comment it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag||needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484363] New: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484363 Summary: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/ggz-base-libs/ggz-base-libs.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/ggz-base-libs/ggz-base-libs-0.99.5-1.src.rpm Description: GGZ (which is a recursive acronym for GGZ Gaming Zone) develops libraries, games and game-related applications for client-server online gaming. Player rankings, game spectators, AI players and a chat bot are part of this effort. A new review required since upstream merged previous libggz, ggz-client-libs into a new ggz-base-libs module. * Fri Feb 06 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 0.99.5-1 - ggz-base-libs-snapshot-0.99.5 - Obsoletes/Provides: libggz,ggz-client-libs Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1109295 for dist-f10, dist-f11+ looks like it needs some additional libtool(2) love, yay. rpmlint output: (using my f8 rpmlint) ggz-base-libs.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/ggz-config ggz-base-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/ggz.menu ggz-base-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/ggz.merge.menu ggz-base-libs-devel.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.ggz 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. These all are harmless here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 --- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 05:42:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some package), what do you think? According to: [wo...@wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires open --repoid=development [wo...@wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires console-tools --repoid=development you can drop the Provides, too. No one seems to require them. Fixed. kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this. OK. kbd.src: W: no-url-tag There's no kbd homepage. How about http://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/legion/kbd ? Well, same URL is in source... But you're probably right, it's better for users than nothing. Fixed. At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I suggest to also add doc/dvorak I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:) Well, say I'd like to give Dvorak a spin and I'll use it side by side with the normal QWERTY layout for a while. Wouldn't I need the docs? Having them on my system might be more convenient than browsing the net for them. Fine, I see it might be useful, so it's added. All changes are written to the CVS, let me know if you have anything else. Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 11:08:28 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 11:09:01 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #28 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-02-06 11:13:41 EDT --- I dare to comment on this here as I cannot agree with Jaroslav -- I think that exactly this is the right place and moment to try explaining the things to someone who just submitted his first package(s): (In reply to comment #24) Done. OK... I hope thats that... Wow.. Its a good thing to be able to contribute. But just a thought really... shuoldn't this process be a lot easier. I mean this should be go through a process to make sure you are who you say you are, then submit the appropriate files to the web interface and thats that. After about a year being a Fedora packager, I think now I understand _why_ the process is so convoluted and, moreover, why it must be so. This process is way to convoluted. I feel like my head has been squeezed like a pimple. Yes, I had similar feelings after submitting my first package, but you should distinct between two different areas of complexity: - Packaging Guidelines -- they are definitely not short and may be seen as too strict, but they are really necessary if we want to keep certain quality level of our packages (and, at least in my opinion, the quality of our packages is a strong point of Fedora compared to other distributions) - all the technicalities around -- the review process, all the review/cvs flags, Koji, Bodhi, cvs access etc. -- all these things are really not as hard as they might appear for the first time and you'll get used to them. Many of those things are great tools or serve for better communication, you'll (hopefully) see. Hence, last but not least: thanks for packaging:)! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 09:46:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Note: SRPM URL no longer valid, and the Source0 field does not provide a URL; I'm reviewing the slightly modified spec, using the newest gtk-vnc release. Right, so I've updated based on your patched spec file. Documentation: the guideline specifies that man and info pages can be left out if they duplicate the pages in the main Fedora package. But how about license texts, README, ChangeLog, etc. -- the files that normally go under %doc ? What we have done in all the other MinGW packages is to include just the license file. The reasoning is roughly that the other files are contained in the native Fedora package, but the license file is in some sense special because we wouldn't want to distribute some code without the license. ? library - ldconfig (this is not needed for MinGW, I suppose?) That's correct. ldconfig does nothing for DLLs. ? headers in -devel: presumably all mingw32- packages are meant for cross-compiling, so this is irrelevant? Yes, everything is for development in MinGW. Here is the updated package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/gtk-vnc/mingw32-gtk-vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.3.8-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.3.8-2 - Needs mingw32-filesystem with the pkg-config library path fix. - Added optional BRs suggested by auto-buildrequires. - Include the license file. * Tue Feb 3 2009 Michel Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org - 0.3.8-1 - Update to 0.3.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483649] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483649 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 08:11:33 EDT --- Thanks again Wolfy :) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xconvers Short Description: Ham radio convers client similar to IRC. Owners: dp67 Branches: F-9, F-10, devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484372] New: Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 Summary: Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ca-0.5.1-0.1.beta.fc10.src.rpm Description: Catalan thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 11:29:06 EDT --- Looking at the spec file should there not be a Requires: evince and gnome-python-desktop? I believe there needs to be a gnome-python2-evince and I've also filed a bug to have the evince libs split out into a sub package as I don't belive sugar-read needs any of the evice gui but rather just the libraries and python binaries. The bug is RHBZ 480729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 09:22:45 EDT --- Bump src to F11 Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xcall.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xcall-0.17-5.fc11.src.rpm - fix unowned directories - use original icon - libax25-devel required in BR does not auto assume - preserve original timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484373] New: Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 Summary: Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-es.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-es-0.20090206-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Spanish thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 11:33:13 EDT --- gnome-python2-evince is in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #29 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-06 11:33:16 EDT --- Milos: you're absolutely right, I agree with every word you've written! But this is review - place to help first time packager, place to review package but not to discuss if the process is good or not. I think correct place for it is devel mailing list. Thanks for help with review. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483657] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo()
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483657 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-02-06 11:49:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-MooseX-POE Short Description: Moose wrapper around a POE::Session Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
