[Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 02:06:56 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 02:06:44 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 02:06:50 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 03:24:06 EDT --- Hmm, ok so no F-11 updates not F-11 updates-testing in there. Note that even if you did have that it still wont build as you also need the ftgl from F-12. So I guess its best to wait till rawhide unfreezes from F-11 and becomes F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #22 from MATSUURA Takanori t.mat...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 03:44:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345573) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345573) Updated dpec file I have updated spec file from that Henrique was generated. With this spec file, I get only one warning: $ rpmlint gluegen-1.0-0.20090527.svn.fc10.x86_64.rpm gluegen.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libgluegen-rt.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I'm not familiar with this issue. So I hope someone will help for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 MATSUURA Takanori t.mat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #345573|Updated dpec file |Updated spec file description|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 --- Comment #1 from Zarko (grof) zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 03:54:31 EDT --- I found a little bug in my spec file, so I resolved this. Daemon did not start at starting of X (runlevel 5), so I added line to correct this. Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/btnx.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/btnx-0.4.11-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 03:58:39 EDT --- Having gluegen splitted isn't that difficult, what remains harder is to have this version of gluegen used to build jogl. (at least, last time I've tried). (then jogl used by openjdk will be the next step) soname is stand for Shared Object NAME, aka the internal name of the library which is defined at link time. usually readelf -a any_system_library.so.x |grep SONAME will show you the one used to recognize the library. But I don't know how ant do to generate soname nor if that's usefull for a java architecture dependant package. (I guess it is). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #20 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 04:17:39 EDT --- * fully agree with the comments in #17 - thanks for the in-depth analysis Mamoru == the legal issue must be fixed * man page sslogger contains an error: FILES /etc/sloger.conf/etc/sslogger.conf Configuration file * Concerning replay - I agree it would be better to rename it to e.g. slreplay $ replay /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log Sending output to: /dev/pts/4 /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log: Permission denied End replay == replay can only be used by people part of group sloggers. Why can a plain user not replay his own logs? == replay man page missing == some useful functions are still missing in replay such as find. I would rather see / as find symbol, rather then f (try to follow vi syntax) * It is rather confusing to see sometimes slogger and then sslogger and then sl e.g. in config.h: #define SLOGGER sslogger * The -h option is not respected: $ sl -h [sudo] password for gdha: $ sslogger -h Sloggerd started, file is /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-gdha-2009.05.27-10:04:37.log Reason for invoking thus interactive shell for gdha: * Found lots of spelling errors in source files and in the man page * why not combining the -u option in sslogger itself? Why using sl for that purpose? * The sl.log file contains not enough information where the log file itself is stored: # cat /var/log/sl/sl.log 2009-05-27 09:24:39 sslogger[30880]; user:gdha; as:root; invoked_shell:/bin/bash; logfile:sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log; reason:test sslogger Actual location is: /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log To use replay (or cat) it would be better to log the full path of the log file. * why do I read in the log file Sloggerd started - it should read sslogger started # ps ax|grep ssl 31720 pts/2S+ 0:00 sslogger 31721 pts/2S+ 0:00 sslogger -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] New: Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Summary: Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthim...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mcu8051ide.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mcu8051ide-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Integrated Development Enviroment for some MCS-51 based microcontrollers (e.g. AT89S8253). Supported languages are assembly and C. First package! Need sponsor! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chitl...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 05:35:36 EDT --- Package Review was started on : https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/19 and now continuing here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-27 05:57:26 EDT --- By the way mock build fails even for dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1379204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #24 from Takanori MATSUURA t.mat...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 06:25:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345591) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345591) Updated spec fie with manual as a separated package We hope jogl will bundled as a Fedora package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795
--- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 06:25:23
EDT ---
#01: This is a no-arch application.
Add
BuildArch: noarch
to the spec file
#02: rpmlint on SRPM
rpmlint package helps to qualify a SRPM or a RPM. It should be applied to every
RPM produced by the spec file. Errors and warnings should be corrected.
A common fix list of errors and warnings is listed on :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues
rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mcu8051ide-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm
mcu8051ide.src: E: description-line-too-long Integrated Development Enviroment
for some MCS-51 based microcontrollers (e.g. AT89S8253). Supported languages
are assembly and C.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings
Break it into several lines.
#03: Keeping timestamps
Can you patch the install.sh file so that during cp timestamps are preserved.
cp -- cp -p
There are some typos in the install.sh files as well :
example: successuful, Unistallation
Then send the patch to upstream.
#04: rpmlint on the RPM
Here there are several errors and warnings. In most cases the fix should be in
the %prep stage.
# rpmlint : hidden-file-or-dir, backup-file-in-package and zero-length
rm lib/.tex*
rm lib/.html
in %install
# rpmlint : non-executable-script
chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/lib/*.tcl
Tip: To check the permissions of the files of a RPM without installing the rpm
$ rpm -qvlp
/home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mcu8051ide-1.1-2.fc10.noarch.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 06:34:49 EDT --- #05: dedundant BRs: - tk-devel already requires tcl-devel, Actually do we need BRs tcl-devel, tk-devel, tkimg, itcl, tdom, tcllib, bwidget, rxvt-unicode here as the rpmbuild is simply a copy process? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 06:39:39 EDT --- task-1.7.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/task-1.7.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 06:42:10 EDT --- task-1.7.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/task-1.7.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502818] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502818 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-dns/sblim-cmpi-dns.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-dns/sblim-cmpi-dns-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The cmpi-dns package provides access to the dns configuration data via CIMOM technology/infrastructure. It contains the Dns CIM Model, CMPI Provider with the Samba task specific Resource Access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Zarko (grof) zarko.pin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zarko.pin...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Zarko (grof) zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 07:02:57 EDT --- Any progress here? What issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787
Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org
--- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-05-27
07:13:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Disabling the latex generation causes all arches to build successfully.
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=981048
Within Fedora versions prior to 10 (as well as for all the RedHat/CentOS
versions, including EL-5), the Latex package was TeTex, whereas it is now
TexLive. An example of how to handle the different packages corresponding to
different versions is given in
http://rmol.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rmol/trunk/rmol/rmol.spec.in?revision=214view=markup
Basically, you may use the following:
%if 0%{?fedora} = 10
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: texlive-latex, texlive-dvips
%endif
%if 0%{?fedora} 10
BuildRequires: tetex-latex, tetex-dvips
%endif
BuildRequires: doxygen, ghostscript
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 07:21:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) By the way mock build fails even for dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1379204 Woops, my bad, here is a fixed version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu-0.9.14-3.fc11.src.rpm And here is a working koji scratch build of it: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1379288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #16 from steve st...@lonetwin.net 2009-05-27 07:34:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Thanks for your time and comments spot. Sorry about the slip-ups, this is the first time I played around with autotools and have learned a lot in the process. Well, if you're going to use a shared library here, you should do it properly, as a versioned .so, with proper packaging. libWN_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 3:0:0 will give you what you want, although, you might talk to upstream to be sure they're okay with the .so numbering starting there. I did mail upstream about this but got no response back. I also checked other distributions (ubuntu and mandriva) and they seem to be using version 3.x.x for the .so ...so, i went with that. Don't forget to delete the .la and .a file, your -devel wildcard is catching them. See why wildcards are tricky! :) Yep ! ...and Done Also, you need to change a few things to ensure that the autotooling happens cleanly, specifically: * BuildRequires: libtool * autoreconf -i instead of just autoreconf Done The new spec and srpm are at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-6.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-27 07:36:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-27
07:36:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
It looks like the native 'ar' is used (/usr/bin/ar) instead of
i686-pc-mingw32-ar. This might need some further investigation.
I thought too that ar was just a simple archiver. But I fixed this anyway.
Another issue I noticed in the .spec file is this:
if a2dll libboost_thread-mt.lib libboost_thread-mt -lpthreadGC2; then
As of mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-8{.fc11,.fc12} it isn't necessary to use
'-lpthreadGC2' anymore. It should be sufficient to use just '-lpthread' here.
I've seen you made the change too, but it seems it hasn't propagated yet to my
mirror. Anyway, I would like to keep it that way for some time until your
change has fully propagated...
For the link errors in the testsuite libraries. I might have found out a way
to
get it operational as shared libraries. Would it be possible to add a main()
function to those testsuite libraries which looks something like this:
Sure, if you write your own dynamic linker :)
Seriously though, this is quite a lot of work to implement, I won't have time
to do this in the next couple of weeks. If someone else wants to give it a try,
be my guest.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Simple multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477
Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bnoc...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 07:44:23
EDT ---
I had a package ready to go, but waiting on a few blocker bugs being fixed
upstream, so here's my comments based on my version of the spec:
- Use %{__python} not python
- From what I gathered, loads of missing Requires:
Requires: dbus-python
Requires: pycairo
Requires: pygtk2
Requires: gstreamer-python
Requires: gstreamer-plugins-good gstreamer-plugins-base
- I'd remove Simple from the descriptions, and say easy-to-use instead.
Simple implies not featureful.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juriskovic.i...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juriskovic.i...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 07:47:20 EDT --- Hi. I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #4 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 07:56:11 EDT --- License* -- COPYING file says GPLv2 or higher. You should change license to mentioned one. By the way you could contact upstream and tell him to include license in header of source files. -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644
--- Comment #20 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2009-05-27
07:57:59 EDT ---
A few quick comments:
* Please use command names consistently, you have both %{__python} and rm for
example. I recommend using python and rm (in the other hand, you can use
%{__python} and %{__rm}).
* screenlets-manager /dev/null doesn't work. You don't have to redirect
stdout, it goes automatically to .xsession-errors on a graphic sessions.
A simple
Exec=screenlets-manager
in screenlets-manager.desktop does the job.
* You can join all the %{_bindir}/screenlets-whatever in %{_bindir}/*
* The directory %{_datadir}/icons/ for screenlets.svg seems wrong to me. In my
system is the only icon present there. I suggest
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps and add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
* You must update the icon cache after installing screenlets.svg. See the
details here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: arista -|Review Request: arista - |Simple multimedia |Easy to use multimedia |transcoder for the GNOME|transcoder for the GNOME |Desktop |Desktop --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 08:15:09 EDT --- oops, I had deleted the Requires. Added back, added disttag. Changed python to macro and replace simple with easy to use. Added desktop-file-validate as well. Take a look http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/arista.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/arista-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502834] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502834 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-samba/sblim-cmpi-samba.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-samba/sblim-cmpi-samba-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The cmpi-samba package provides access to the samba configuration data via CIMOM technology/infrastructure. It contains the Samba CIM Model, CMPI Provider with the Samba task specific Resource Access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-05-27 08:33:28 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 08:49:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Looks good to me. APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: chromium-bsu Short Description: Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502839] New: Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502839 Summary: Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eugene_be...@mail.ru QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://223-223.ru/pub/fedora/specs/nginx.spec SRPM URL: ftp://223-223.ru/pub/fedora/misc/SRPMS/nginx-0.6.36-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Nginx [engine x] is an HTTP(S) server, HTTP(S) reverse proxy and IMAP/POP3 proxy server written by Igor Sysoev. In the stock Fedora nginx package there is only one third party module included, nginx-upstream-fair. However, nginx by itself provides very poor authentication support (only HTTP Basic Auth is actually supported). There's a PAM Auth module available for nginx (see full list of 3rd party modules here http://wiki.nginx.org/Nginx3rdPartyModules#Auth_PAM_Module). With this module been included we could have a vast number of authentication options enabled, as almost everything is supported through the PAM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502843] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502843 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-fsvol/sblim-cmpi-fsvol.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-fsvol/sblim-cmpi-fsvol-1.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Fsvol Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 09:43:41 EDT --- #01 - Done #02 - Done #03 - Done #04 - Done. But, I get: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/mcu8051ide-1.1-3.fc10.noarch.rpm mcu8051ide.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency tcllib tcllib is required runtime, so I have to explicitly specify it. #05 The configure script calls cmake, and does BR library checks. So, it is required. === configure OUTPUT === $ ./configure -- The C compiler identification is GNU -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc -- works -- Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done Check for Tcl Interpreter -- Found Tclsh: /usr/bin/tclsh -- Found TCL: /usr/lib/libtcl.so -- Found TCLTK: /usr/lib/libtcl.so -- Found TK: /usr/lib/libtk.so Check for BWidget Check for Itcl Check for Tcl Check for md5 Check for Tk Check for img::png Check for tdom -- Configuring done -- Generating done === END === Please take .spec release 3: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mcu8051ide.spec http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mcu8051ide-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502851] New: Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Summary: Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pokerth.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pokerth-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PokerTH is a poker game written in C++/QT4. You can play the popular Texas Hold'em poker variant against up to six computer-opponents or play network games with people all over the world. This poker engine is available for Linux, Windows, and MacOSX. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502854] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3-1.0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Nfsv3 Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502856] New: Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Summary: Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain-0.99-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: PDF Chain is a GUI for pdftk written with gtkmm. You can merge some pdf files to one pdf file or split. There are also some options and tools. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||502870 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-27 11:24:00 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||502878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-27 11:25:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ transport for Jabber servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-27 11:30:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 11:35:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-repoze-who-testutil Short Description: Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ...and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 11:34:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: woodardworks-laconic-fonts Short Description: An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redhat.com ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-27 11:39:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) So I have created a new xsd package for Fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Sorry, I completely missed your message of this. I will check this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunda...@redhat.com Summary|Review Request: WordNet - A |Review Request: wordnet - A |lexical database for the|lexical database for the |english language|english language Alias|WordNet |wordnet --- Comment #17 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 11:43:54 EDT --- Fixing the title to match the package so that review reports count it right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 12:16:04 EDT --- Your comments explain why you've decided to bundle the libraries in with enano. What they do not do is explain how you've mitigated the problems with bundling libraries: 1) Bundling libraries means that whenever a security issue comes up in a library we have to first find the applications that bundle those libraries, then fix the version in that application (which could be an older version or forked from mainline and so not just a matter of applying an update). 2) We have to audit the code to find out if there are licensing issues. With just a quick look at the code, I've found that: * includes/captcha/engine_failsafe.php: is GPL (v2 only) (so Enano as a whole would need to be GPLv2 only, not GPLv2 or later.) * includes/clientside/admin-menu.js: the Tigra Tree Menu should be looked at by spot/FSF. The term header needs to be clarified and we need to know if this usage is in compliance. * includes/wikiengine/Render/Plain/Prefilter.php: is licensed under the PHP license v2.0 which is GPL incompatible. So it's use with Enano might not be okay. * includes/graphs.php: is licensed under the PHP license v3.01 whichisGPL incompatible. Once again, this might not be okay. * includes/graphs.php also has this sketchy bit of text: // Graph Generator for PHP // Originally located at http://szewo.com/php/graph, but link was broken, so this file was retrieved from: // http://web.archive.org/web/20030130065944/szewo.com/php/graph/graph.class.php3.txt // License unknown, however sources on the web have shown this to be either GPL or public domain. If the link is broken and the license is unknown, what leads you to think that the code is public domain? At best some citation is missing. At worst, this has to be removed/remaining pieces will need to be rewritten for Enano. * There are many files that reference external files for the details of their license information, for example GPL-LICENSE.txt Remember, this wasn't an exhaustive search -- it was only a series of quick greps to look for especially problematic files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||502894 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502839] Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502839 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 12:26:01 EDT --- You should file a bug against nginx itself, rather than adding this review request. Please, notify Fedora's nginx maintainer via bugzilla or maybe even directly. All necessary information can be obtained here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/nginx That's why I'm closing this ticket. O/T you may find it interesting to discuss some aspects of Fedora development in russian language in unofficial xmpp conference: fedora-de...@conference.jabber.ru -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 12:29:41 EDT --- I'm just curious - why it requires rxvt-unicode for both building and working? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:37:08 EDT --- python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:38:44 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:37:04 EDT --- python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:38:40 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:38:49 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||497719 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-27 12:49:35 EDT --- Tank you. The licensing guideline says If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this perspective. Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll use COPYING to imply that it is under the GPL, all versions (GPL+). That's why I used GPL+. Please see case #4 at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ I already asked Hermann to include the GPL version in the source headers a while ago (around guitarix-0.04-2) but he didn't do it. I guess we will have to live with what we have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583
--- Comment #18 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-27
13:08:07 EDT ---
%files
...
%{_libdir}/libWN.so*
%files devel
...
%{_libdir}/libWN.so*
You're double-packaging those files. The .so.* go in the main package, and the
.so goes into the -devel package. It should be:
%files
...
%{_libdir}/libWN.so.*
%files devel
...
%{_libdir}/libWN.so
You're also missing the necessary %post and %postun invocations for packages
with shared libraries, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #10 from Paul Fox p...@laptop.org 2009-05-27 13:20:02 EDT --- this review has been stalled for several weeks. i'm hoping that soon some of the pressure will ease on fedora folk, and that perhaps we can pick it up again? the above URLs for the 6-1 version of the package are still valid, but on checking just now, there was a discrepancy between the sizes of what was on the web vs. what was in my build tree, so i've rebuilt and re-uploaded to dev.laptop.org, just in case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-27 13:25:59 EDT --- ! About Licensing: - While most files in the source archives are under GPLv2+ with exceptions which contains the clause to allow the linkage against xerces-c which are under ASL 2.0, some files are strict GPLv2. Then with verbose=yes, build.log shows (for example): - 96 g++ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386/i486/i586/i686 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386/i486/i586 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386/i486 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/generic -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/../install/include-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.cxx 102 ar -rc /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/libcult.a /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/eh/exception.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/mm/new.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/mm/counter.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/mm/buffer.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/rtti/type-info.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/trace/log.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/file-arguments.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/scanner.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/options.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/options-parser.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/options-spec.o 306 g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/xsd /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/xsd.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/elements.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/elements.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/validator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/name-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/type-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/state-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/generator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-inline.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-forward.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/impl-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/impl-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/driver-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/element-validation-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/attribute-validation-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/characters-validation-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/elements.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/validator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/counter.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/name-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/generator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-forward.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-inline.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-source.o
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 13:31:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) CVS done. Thanks, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518
--- Comment #16 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 13:30:37
EDT ---
Reviewing as the flags policy has been suspended for now.
Full review done:
MUST FIX
* The docs are currently duplicated between the main package
and the -docs package. put the README, COPYING etc only in the main package
and the rest in the -docs package
* Make the -docs package Require the main package (with full evr)
* Upstream source files are AWOL (newer RC?) so I cannot verify the origin
of the files included in the srpm
SHOULD FIX
--
* Why aren't you using %configure, if there is a specific reason not to
please add a comment explaining this to the .spec file
* Don't untar %{SOURCE1} in %build instead add -a 1 as extra arguments to
%setup, or even better take a look at generating the docs buildtime as
suggested in comment #14
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Matthew Truch m...@truch.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Matthew Truch m...@truch.net 2009-05-27 13:36:39 EDT --- Building now (or already done) with pushes soon thereafter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-27 13:35:10 EDT --- Okay, now I approve this package. -- This package (xml-security-c) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Install the Client Tools (Koji). Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 502894, which changed state. Bug 502894 Summary: Add libmbca support to NetworkManager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502894 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-27 13:58:40 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fullfill with naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent release of the application + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 0ede5640b1c6f0f2f513e992b60a261f) + Package contains valid License tag + License tags excalim GPLV3+ as an valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Consistently rpm macro usage + Package doesn't contains subpackages + Proper Buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned on beginning of %clean and %install + RPM_OPT_FLAGS will be honour on build step + Build step support smp enabled make + Local build works fine + No complaints from rpmlint for source rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for binary rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for debuginfo rpm + Debuginfo package contains sources + Local install/uninstall works fine + Short test of the application looks fine. + Files has proper files permissions + All package files are owned by the package + %files stanza contains no duplicated entries + %doc stanzs is small, so we don't need an extra subpackage + Package contains proper Changelog Bad: - Source header indicates GPLv3 as license instead of GPLv3+ Please talk with upstream for clarification - Scratch build failed on koji Please see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380090 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #19 from steve st...@lonetwin.net 2009-05-27 13:57:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) You're double-packaging those files. The .so.* go in the main package, and the .so goes into the -devel package. It should be: ... Done. You're also missing the necessary %post and %postun invocations for packages with shared libraries, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries Yep ! Sorry about that ...something I forgot. Done. As always, thanks for your time. The new spec and srpm are at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-7.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-27 14:19:31 EDT --- I have try to make a first look on this package. Unfortunately, I could found any java sources. The wrapper script try to call a java class which I could found in this package. It may nice, if you can give me a explaination. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #20 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 14:21:26 EDT --- rpmlint says: wordnet.src:107: W: macro-in-%changelog files wordnet.src:109: W: macro-in-%changelog pre (it also says: wordnet.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libWN.so.3.0.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 but that is reasonably safe to ignore) Just use %%macro instead of %macro when you mention things in the changelog. Oh, and you should also get in the habit of running rpmlint on your packages after you build them. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-27 14:33:28 EDT --- Note: I can't get this to build on F10 due to missing /usr/include/boost/asio.hpp, in F11 it builds fine, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 14:32:44 EDT --- I guess the possible way to resolve this license conflict is to relicense all files in this source tarball which are under GPLv2 to GPLv2+ (or GPLv2+ with exceptions: note that ASL 2.0 is compatible with GPLv3). Either option would be acceptable, please reach out to upstream and have them correct it one way or the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-27 14:39:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Bad: - Source header indicates GPLv3 as license instead of GPLv3+ Please talk with upstream for clarification Good catch. The license tag is from Leigh's spec. Should've checked it myself. Send an email upstream. - Scratch build failed on koji Please see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380090 Duh, should've checked this too :) OK, missing BR and license have been fixed. I set the license to GPLv3 as it is more restrictive than GPLv3+, I can change it when upstream replies. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain-0.99-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 14:45:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) I have try to make a first look on this package. Unfortunately, I could found any java sources. The wrapper script try to call a java class which I could found in this package. It may nice, if you can give me a explaination. Yes. The 389-console package just provides the skin or flavor for the console. The console implementation package is idm-console-framework, which is a requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #21 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 14:48:42 EDT --- Because the original copyright holder on sslogger.c is the Regents of the University of California, this isn't a problem (because they have dropped the advertising clause on all code they are the copyright holder for). I've been meaning to write this up as a FAQ entry for some time now, and this was a good reminder: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#BSD_with_advertising Please ask upstream to remove the advertising clause from that file. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-27 14:51:56 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC files matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + Package contains valid license tag + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Could download sources via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 0357fee5f1ab61e7ead345a2c76cd3b6) + License tag state GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package doesn't contains subpacakges + Package has proper Provides/Obsoles statement for renaming + Proper Buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned on beginning of %clean and %install + Package contains SMP-enabled build + Local build works fine + Build use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS as compiler flags + No complaints from rpmlint for source rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for binary rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for debuginfo rpm + Debuginfo contains sources + Files has proper file permission + %file stanza doesn't contains dupblicated entries + All package files are owned by this package + Ther are no other package which claims one of the package files + %doc stanza is small. + Chagelog stanza has proper format Bad: - LICENSE file state GPLV2+ as license - Header files state GPLv2 with exception or GPLv2 as license - Package doesn't contains verbatin copy of the license - Scratch build fails on koji (Please refer to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380175) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-27 15:02:30 EDT --- Ok, now the koji scratch build works fine, so I can APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.3004-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:03:43 EDT --- perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.43-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:04:06 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.04-1.fc11 |0.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:04:30 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:06:23 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.43-1.fc10 |0.43-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.2-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:07:27 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:07:17 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.2-1.fc10 |0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.04-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-27 15:08:15 EDT --- Thanks for the speedy review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pdfchain Short Description: A GUI for pdftk Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:08:12 EDT --- perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:07:53 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.3004-1.fc11 |0.3004-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
