[Bug 202384] Review Request: dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 11:41 EST --- Dates has been built for extras-development. Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202384] Review Request: dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 10:57 EST ---
PUBLISH +1
Good:
* tarball verified against svn
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* Desktop entry is fine
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* All desired features are enabled
* Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined
* Scriptlets look good.
* Files have appropriate permissions and owners
* Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5
* rpmlint is basically clean. The warning about the devel package not having
docs can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202384] Review Request: dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202384] Review Request: dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 07:57 EST --- COPYING is already in the main package, and the devel package requires the main package. Putting it in the devel package seems silly to me, and just fiddling to make rpmlint happy on a warning. If there are ever any development docs I'll add them to the devel package, but for now there are hardly _ANY_ docs to speak of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202384] Review Request: dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 02:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #0) > Also, no docs for -devel but I think thats ignorable. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to simply add the COPYING file to %doc in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202384] Review Request: dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-13 22:06 EST --- When using dates, I discovered that it cannot display recurring events. I've filed a bug upstream: http://bugzilla.o-hand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
