On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> missing checks for interger overflows of the addition and subtraction
>
> also the subject says "RFC", is there a reason not to push this to
> git master once it otherwise looks good ?
it is incomplete, basically I
Hi,
as part of adding support for non-string data types to .mov metadata,
I wondered about adding the following helper functions for storing
numeric types into an AVDictionary.
upfront I'll say I'm not 100% happy with the float32 and float64 named
variants (vs float and double) as there is no
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
libavfilter/vf_thumbnail.c | 58 +++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_thumbnail.c b/libavfilter/vf_thumbnail.c
index d70d063..c378791 100644
---
Hi FFmpeg developers,
Sorry for the spam. I know you are busy. Please take your time to review
the patch. I don't mean to rush at all.
Since the is my first patch, I just want to make sure I was doing the right
thing. Please kindly let me know if I posted to a wrong mail group or made
the patch
On 9/4/2015 5:53 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> James Almer gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Isn't removing these two going to break
>> compatibility with libav?
>
> (ABI or API?)
> I don't think so but I absolutely may miss something.
>
> Carl Eugen
ABI, you're removing elements from the middle of
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:38:54 +0100
Kevin Wheatley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as part of adding support for non-string data types to .mov metadata,
> I wondered about adding the following helper functions for storing
> numeric types into an AVDictionary.
>
> upfront I'll say
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:38:54 +0100
> Kevin Wheatley wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> as part of adding support for non-string data types to .mov metadata,
>> I wondered about adding the following helper functions
This can happen if we do bidirectional MC, where one reference has the
same size as the current frame, but the other one doesn't.
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 219 +--
1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c
On 9/4/15, Tsung-Hung Wu wrote:
> Hi FFmpeg developers,
>
> Sorry for the spam. I know you are busy. Please take your time to review
> the patch. I don't mean to rush at all.
> Since the is my first patch, I just want to make sure I was doing the right
> thing. Please
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index e6c5389..3bd2a0f 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vp9.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vp9.c
@@ -4335,6 +4335,7 @@ static int
vp9_decode_update_thread_context(AVCodecContext *dst, const AVCodecCo
Thanks wm4. I updated the patch according to your comments.
>* @@ -489,19 +489,21 @@ static int mp3_seek(AVFormatContext *s, int
*>* stream_index, int64_t timestamp,
*>* AVStream *st = s->streams[0];
*>* int64_t ret = av_index_search_timestamp(st, timestamp, flags);
*>* int64_t
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index 25a7b1d..7624743 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vp9.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vp9.c
@@ -3353,9 +3353,9 @@ static void decode_b(AVCodecContext *ctx, int row, int
From 094c6efab6c5eec1fec274bf1bcace1987ae7d03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Wu
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:08:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] avformat/mp3dec: Make MP3 seek fast
When AVFMT_FLAG_FAST_SEEK is specified, make MP3 seek operation as
fast as possible.
When no
---
libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c b/libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c
index 5a8578a..9395a0c 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c
@@ -1131,8 +1131,8 @@ static
Fixes integer overflows for extreme coefficient values in 10/12bpp content.
---
libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c b/libavcodec/vp9dsp_template.c
index 9395a0c..4d810fe 100644
---
James Almer gmail.com> writes:
> >> Isn't removing these two going to break
> >> compatibility with libav?
> >
> > (ABI or API?)
> > I don't think so but I absolutely may miss something.
> ABI, you're removing elements from the middle of the
> struct.
In which situation would that be an
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index 238185a..e6c5389 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vp9.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vp9.c
@@ -4340,10 +4340,8 @@ static int
vp9_decode_update_thread_context(AVCodecContext *dst,
On 9/4/2015 6:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> James Almer gmail.com> writes:
Isn't removing these two going to break
compatibility with libav?
>>>
>>> (ABI or API?)
>>> I don't think so but I absolutely may miss something.
>
>> ABI, you're removing elements from the middle of the
>>
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:43 PM, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 6:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> James Almer gmail.com> writes:
> Isn't removing these two going to break
> compatibility with libav?
(ABI or API?)
I don't think so but I absolutely may
Carl Eugen Hoyos ag.or.at> writes:
> Please also look at the patch attached in ticket #4820,
> I will add the additional uls if you don't object.
I pushed these additional codec_uls since they affect
decoding only together with my patch posted here.
Hope that's ok, Carl Eugen
Fixes CID 1322309.
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index 7624743..e67c761 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vp9.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vp9.c
@@ -4250,7 +4250,8 @@ static int vp9_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *ctx, void
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 07:33:29PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Fixes CID 1322309.
> ---
> libavcodec/vp9.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
this breaks fate
--- ./tests/ref/fate/vp9-16-intra-only 2015-09-05 00:47:48.445308437 +0200
+++
Fixes CID 1322309.
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index 7624743..25e7419 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vp9.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vp9.c
@@ -4250,7 +4250,9 @@ static int vp9_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *ctx,
L'octidi 18 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Kevin Wheatley a écrit :
> as part of adding support for non-string data types to .mov metadata,
> I wondered about adding the following helper functions for storing
> numeric types into an AVDictionary.
>
> upfront I'll say I'm not 100% happy with the float32
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:55:22 -0700
Tsung-Hung Wu wrote:
> From 094c6efab6c5eec1fec274bf1bcace1987ae7d03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andy Wu
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:08:30 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] avformat/mp3dec: Make MP3 seek fast
>
>
Carl Eugen Hoyos ag.or.at> writes:
> .init = j2kenc_init,
> .encode2= encode_frame,
> .close = j2kenc_destroy,
> -.capabilities = AV_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL,
Patch applied.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 19:42:18 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 7:06 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:43 PM, James Almer wrote:
> >> On 9/4/2015 6:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >>> James Almer gmail.com> writes:
> >> Isn't
On 9/4/2015 7:06 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:43 PM, James Almer wrote:
>> On 9/4/2015 6:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> James Almer gmail.com> writes:
>> Isn't removing these two going to break
>> compatibility with libav?
>
> (ABI
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:11:05PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Fixes CID 1322309.
> ---
> libavcodec/vp9.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
LGTM
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Good people do not need laws
James Almer gmail.com> writes:
> Isn't removing these two going to break
> compatibility with libav?
(ABI or API?)
I don't think so but I absolutely may miss something.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
30 matches
Mail list logo