Hi,
On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 6:43 PM Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 at 23:17, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 9:12 AM James Almer wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/2/2024 10:06 AM, James Almer wrote:
> >
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 9:12 AM James Almer wrote:
> On 6/2/2024 10:06 AM, James Almer wrote:
> > On 6/2/2024 9:14 AM, Kacper Michajłow wrote:
> >> Fixes runtime error: member access within misaligned address
> >> for type 'av_alias64', which requires 8 byte alignment.
> >>
> >> VP9mv is
Hi,
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:03 AM Tomas Härdin wrote:
> tor 2024-05-30 klockan 16:06 +0300 skrev Rémi Denis-Courmont:
> >
> >
> > Le 30 mai 2024 12:50:05 GMT+03:00, "Tomas Härdin" a
> > écrit :
> > > tor 2024-05-30 klockan 10:54 +0300 skrev Rémi Denis-Courmont:
> > > > Can't we just use the
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:33 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> toq...@outlook.com:
> > From: Wu Jianhua
> >
> > Some tests fails with certain seeds
> >
> > tests/checkasm/checkasm 2325607578 --test=vvc_alf
> > checkasm: using random seed 2325607578
> >
Hi,
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:28 PM wrote:
> From: Wu Jianhua
>
> Some tests fails with certain seeds
>
> tests/checkasm/checkasm 2325607578 --test=vvc_alf
> checkasm: using random seed 2325607578
> AVX2:
> vvc_alf_filter_luma_120x20_12_avx2 (vvc_alf.c:104)
>
Hi,
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 3:44 PM Wu Jianhua wrote:
> Ronald S. Bultje:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:38 AM toq...@outlook.com>> wrote:
> > +%else
> > +vpunpcklqdq m11, m2, m2
> > +vpunpckhqdq m12, m2, m2
> > +vpunpcklwd
Hi,
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:38 AM wrote:
> +%else
> +vpunpcklqdq m11, m2, m2
> +vpunpckhqdq m12, m2, m2
> +vpunpcklwd m11, m11, m14
> +vpunpcklwd m12, m12, m14
> +paddd m0, m11
> +paddd m1, m12
> +packssdw m0,
Hi,
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 7:39 AM Andrey Turkin
wrote:
> Have to say, this issue has been a long grievance of mine. There is no
> reason to delay frames when the decoder is set up to ignore B frames
> as there is no reordering to be done
>
Frame threading?
Ronald
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 1:28 PM Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:16 PM Lynne via ffmpeg-devel
> wrote:
> > I'd hate to apply fixes with no information in shared code. This can get
> > removed with no information about what relies on it.
>
> Changing 5 different hwaccel
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:36 AM Hendrik Leppkes
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:19 AM llyyr wrote:
> >
> > segmentation.update_map is never reset to 0 on a new frame, and retains
> > the value from the previous frame. This bugs out a bunch of hwaccel
> > drivers when
Hi,
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:01 PM Stone Chen wrote:
> Adds checkasm for DMVR SAD AVX2 implementation.
>
> Benchmarks ( AMD 7940HS )
> vvc_sad_8x8_c: 50.3
> vvc_sad_8x8_avx2: 0.3
> vvc_sad_16x16_c: 250.3
> vvc_sad_16x16_avx2: 10.3
> vvc_sad_32x32_c: 1020.3
> vvc_sad_32x32_avx2: 60.3
>
Hi,
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:01 PM Stone Chen wrote:
> Implements AVX2 DMVR (decoder-side motion vector refinement) SAD
> functions. DMVR SAD is only calculated if w >= 8, h >= 8, and w * h > 128.
> To reduce complexity, SAD is only calculated on even rows. This is
> calculated for all video
Hi,
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 8:55 PM Stone Chen wrote:
> Adds checkasm for DMVR SAD AVX2 implementation.
>
> Benchmarks ( AMD 7940HS )
> vvc_sad_8x8_c: 70.0
> vvc_sad_8x8_avx2: 10.0
> vvc_sad_16x16_c: 280.0
> vvc_sad_16x16_avx2: 20.0
> vvc_sad_32x32_c: 1020.0
> vvc_sad_32x32_avx2: 70.0
>
Hi,
one more, I forgot.
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 8:46 PM Stone Chen wrote:
> +pw_1: dw 1
>
[..]
> +vpbroadcastw m4, [pw_1]
>
We typically suggest to use vpbroadcastd, not w (and then pw_1: times 2 dw
1). agner shows that on e.g. Haswell, the former (d) is 1 uops with 5
cycles
Hi,
This is mostly good, the following is tiny nitpicks.
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 8:46 PM Stone Chen wrote:
> +%macro INIT_OFFSET 6 ; src1, src2, dxq, dyq, off1, off2
>
The macro is only used once, so you could inline it in the calling function.
>
> +imul%5, 128
> +imul
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 4:40 PM Stone Chen wrote:
> +vvc_sad_8:
> +.loop_height:
> +movu xm0, [src1q]
> +movu xm1, [src2q]
> +MIN_MAX_SAD xm2, xm0, xm1
> +vpmovzxwd m1, xm1
> +vpaddd m3,
Hi,
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 11:59 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Fixes: CID1507483 Unchecked return value
>
> Sponsored-by: Sovereign Tech Fund
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
> ---
> libavcodec/vp8.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 4:40 PM Stone Chen wrote:
> Implements AVX2 DMVR (decoder-side motion vector refinement) SAD
> functions. DMVR SAD is only calculated if w >= 8, h >= 8, and w * h > 128.
> To reduce complexity, SAD is only calculated on even rows. This is
> calculated for all video
Hi,
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 9:50 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> * Fund professional real live presence on multimedia / FOSS / buisness
> related
> events. we already refund individuals but i think we are lacking on the
> organizational
> side. We should also have on these events at least
Hi,
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 7:33 AM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>
>
> Le 3 mai 2024 14:28:59 GMT+03:00, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> a écrit :
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:53 AM Rémi Denis-Courmont
> wrote:
> >
> >> Le 2 mai 2024 21:
Hi,
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:53 AM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le 2 mai 2024 21:38:13 GMT+03:00, "Ronald S. Bultje"
> a écrit :
> >On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:44 PM Vittorio Giovara <
> vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >> I believe the pat
Hi,
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:44 PM Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> I believe the path forward would be designing a system that can accommodate
> both workflows
>
I agree with this.
Ronald
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 9:40 AM Mark Thompson wrote:
> The flag in CBS is the value read from the bitstream (as required for
> passthrough), but the specification overrides that by setting it
> immediately after reading if the frame is intra.
> ---
> This is already done for DXVA and VDPAU.
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 7:47 AM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Regression since e1ba00ac8f755f37ebc8448d3dbea906d7b79da2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt
> ---
> libavcodec/vp8.c | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:58 PM Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:48 PM Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 2:06 PM Vittorio Giovara <
> > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 2:06 PM Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:00 AM Diederick C. Niehorster <
> dcni...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If i recall correctly, there was a conversation not too long ago about
> what
> > to do with all the SPI money. This seems to be a perfect
Nicolas,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:41 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> This, sadly, your ilk has the power to enforce.
>
Some CC members believe it would be helpful for you (and maybe to others)
if we explicitly laid out some ground rules more explicitly, so let us try:
- you are entitled to any
Derek,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:50 AM Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> I assume Thilo was hung over, and thus not on the booth.
>
> It is a disgrace.
>
This was an unnecessary personal attack, please don't do that again. Repeat
offense may result in temporary bans on the mailinglist and/or IRC.
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:47 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Kieran's criticism is unfounded one. As I, originally 'volunteered' in that
> now 'famous' ticket about Certain Big Corpo bug report and kindly replied
> in friendly manner to bug reporter and give reporter free support, me still
>
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 7:54 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> This commit adds value range checks to cbs_vp8_read_unsigned_le,
> migrates fixed() to use it, and enforces little-endian consistency for
> all read methods.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianhui Dai
> ---
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 2:05 AM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> The VP8 compressed header may not be byte-aligned due to boolean
> coding. Round up byte count for accurate data positioning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianhui Dai
> ---
> libavcodec/cbs_vp8.c | 4
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 8:25 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Some members of the CC want to indefinitely ban Balling
> from trac. And as our doc/community.texi says:
> "Indefinite bans from the community must be confirmed by the General
> Assembly, in a majority vote."
>
> Thus some CC
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 10:46 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> [..] you can see they have in the recent years gained a
> lot of influence in FFmpeg [..]
>
I hope you realize that is what reconciliation looks like. In other words:
this was always the goal - from both "sides". You seem to
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 12:37 AM Gyan Doshi wrote:
> [..]
>
This recusal may be effected either directly by
>the TC member, or by a vote of the Community Committee (CC)
>
The CC is for enforcement of behavioural guidelines (CoC), not for
technical matters, so this strikes me as a bit
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 2:17 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2024-02-26 19:12:45)
> > That's essentially what I was suggesting: run a GA vote on your proposed
> > amendment, and then run a separate GA vote on Nicolas' proposed
> amendment.
>
> Th
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:34 AM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2024-02-23 20:36:11)
> > Hi Nicolas
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:56 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> >
> > > Anton Khirnov (12024-02-22):
> > > > In my update
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 5:30 PM Henrik Gramner via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 5:42 PM Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > +movam13, [pw_8]
> > +paddw m10, m12, m12
> > +paddw
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:28 AM James Almer wrote:
> On 2/25/2024 1:22 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:56 AM Ronald S. Bultje
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:28 AM J. Dekker wrot
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:22 AM Ronald S. Bultje
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:56 AM Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:28 AM J. Dekker wrote:
>>
>>> Weak filter can overflow in delta0 calculatio
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:56 AM Ronald S. Bultje
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:28 AM J. Dekker wrote:
>
>> Weak filter can overflow in delta0 calculation before >> 4 in int16.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: J. Dekker
>> ---
>>
>> I d
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:28 AM J. Dekker wrote:
> Weak filter can overflow in delta0 calculation before >> 4 in int16.
>
> Signed-off-by: J. Dekker
> ---
>
> I do not know x86 simd at all, so this is just an attempt to fix
> the implementation rather than write extremely performant
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 1:28 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> so if i had to maintain a public list, that list would never be reliable
>
I can continue updating it. The current list is:
$ ssh ffmpeg.org cat /etc/group|grep samples|tr ':' '\n'|grep ,|tr ',' ' '
compn cehoyos reimar beastd
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 3:54 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> +Fate:
+~
> +fatesamples are provided via rsync. Every FFmpeg developer who has a
> shell account in ffmepg.org
> +should be in the samples group and be able to upload samples.
> +See
>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:15 AM Nuo Mi wrote:
> +static void ibc_fill_vir_buf(const VVCLocalContext *lc, const CodingUnit
> *cu)
> [..]
>
+av_image_copy_plane(ibc_buf, ibc_stride, src, src_stride,
> cu->cb_width >> hs << ps , cu->cb_height >> vs);
>
I'm admittedly not
Hi Nicolas
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:56 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Anton Khirnov (12024-02-22):
> > In my updated proposal, based on comments by Niklas and Rémi, I'm
> > leaving it up to the TC member in question, based on the assumption that
> > TC members are honest.
> >
> > A "stronger"
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 5:34 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> More formally, you could define a "party to a disagreement" as
> all minimal sets of people whos non existence would resolve the
> disagreement
>
I think I agree with this interpretation of the rules.
Ronald
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:44 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> [..] i see as only options left to either do a quick vote on
> the finished Coverity bug fixing SoW, so a simple "is this text ok", and if
> yes nothing anyone says later can create another problem.
>
That seems reasonable.
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:58 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Theres the person writing a SoW for work he wants to do.
> Theres the person who accepts the SoW in FFmpeg
> Theres the person who passes accepted SoW on to SPI/STF
>
> Iam sadly involved in more than one role here.
>
I
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:04 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> I think you should sign a SoW that has "Merged in git master" as a
> Deliverable
>
I already did. It was fine.
> PS: do you have a single person willing to sign this Deliverable you
> want ?
> If not, how will the STF thing work
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 4:23 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> What i can and did and do suggest is
> "Patches submitted for review to the FFMPEG dev mailing list. As well as
> taking care of all reasonable review comments."
>
> If "all reasonable review comments" is not enough then what are
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:17 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> I wont work for months to
> then be at the mercy of not a single of 2000 subscribers posting some
> "i object" and all 2000 know in this situation it would cause an
> inconvenience to me.
>
That's a strawman version of how our
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:05 AM Niklas Haas wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:21:21 -0500 "Ronald S. Bultje"
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:15 AM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
&
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:15 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:18:20AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:06 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:06 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> 2. Deliverables
> Patches submitted for review to the FFMPEG dev mailing list.
>
I think the goal is to get patches merged, not submitted.
Ronald
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:05 PM Nuo Mi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 9:23 AM Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 8:03 PM Nuo Mi wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 6:52 PM Nuo Mi wrote:
> > >
> &
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 8:03 PM Nuo Mi wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 6:52 PM Nuo Mi wrote:
>
> > ---
> > libavcodec/vvc/vvc_filter_template.c | 82 +---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libavcodec/vvc/vvc_filter_template.c
Paul,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
>
the CC requests that you please refrain from attacking fellow FFmpeg
contributors ("what serious feature [have] you contributed? - Nothing") on
the mailinglist.
Signed
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:31 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-12-21):
> > Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
>
> I did not want to say it, but since it is now in the open: Not nothing:
> negative. His naysaying discouraged me from working further on
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:33 AM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> There are some serious issues in this code.
>
While already very insightful, it would be enormously helpful if you could
expand on this statement with more detail, such as a list of issues as they
exist in this code.
Ronald
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:04 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> But do not expect it to be fixed, they have hated lavd for ever and now
> they have all the control.
>
Your message promotes conspiracy theories ("they have all control", "they
have hated lavd for ever", etc.) and suggests
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 7:33 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 08:29:14AM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Attached.
>
> > MAINTAINERS | 55
> ---
> > 1 file changed, 55 deletions(-)
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:23 AM Marton Balint wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marton Balint
> ---
> doc/APIchanges | 3 +++
> doc/codecs.texi| 14 ++
> libavcodec/avcodec.h | 4
> libavcodec/decode.c| 6 ++
> libavcodec/options_table.h
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 3:10 PM Timo Rothenpieler
wrote:
> So if the compiler does a copy
> in decode_cpe() with avx instructions, but ffmpeg is built with
> --disable-avx
>
Ehm... What? That seems like the core bug then?
Ronald
___
ffmpeg-devel
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 7:01 PM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 2023, at 3:14 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > If you give Jerry a weight of 10 and give Tom a weight of 9, that means
> > you prefer Jerry over Tom because 10 > 9
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 6:58 AM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> There are reports from people on IRC that they got confused by the
> change and voted the reverse of what they meant. Sadly there is no way
> to change your vote after it's been case, so if there is a nontrivial
> number of such people,
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 4:39 AM Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Can not access irc anymore.
>
If my understanding is correct, this was caused by the +r channel mode,
which means your nick needs to be registered with channel services before
you can join the channel.
We (me & Anton, mostly) decided
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 8:53 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> TESTS: ffmpeg -i fate-suite/vp8/frame_size_change.webm -vcodec copy
> -bsf:v trace_headers -f null -
>
(I've merged this already.)
I don't think a fate test was added to prevent regressions.
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 8:43 AM Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 2:55 AM Dai, Jianhui J <
> jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>> Oh, this is the preceding patch of:
>> `[FFmpeg-devel,v6] avcodec/cbs_vp8: Ad
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 2:28 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> but nobody here knows
>
Unsubstantiated FUD.
Move on.
Ronald
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 1:44 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Nothing prevents their boss from telling them how to vote, even if the
> ballots are secret.
>
How is this not just unsubstantiated FUD? We're discussing concerns that
are randomly thrown in without evidence that they're relevant or
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 2:55 AM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> Oh, this is the preceding patch of:
> `[FFmpeg-devel,v6] avcodec/cbs_vp8: Add support for VP8 codec bitstream`
>
> Probably, I need merge these two together.
>
It's ok like this, for me. I'll
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 10:55 AM Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Jianhui,
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 8:52 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
> jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>> The smaller delta patch to export the variable:
>> https://patchwor
Hi Jianhui,
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 8:52 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> The smaller delta patch to export the variable:
> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/dm6pr11mb268186349e600824e1577dfdb1...@dm6pr11mb2681.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:01 AM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> > Ronald S. Bultje
> > Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 8:08 PM
> > To: FFmpeg
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 7:07 AM Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 11:13 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
> jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>> > > +static const uint8_t vp8_token_update_probs[4][8][3][11] = {
>> >
>> > It would b
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 11:13 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > > +static const uint8_t vp8_token_update_probs[4][8][3][11] = {
> >
> > It would be nice if these symbols could be re-used from the existing vp8
> > native decoder, instead of duplicating them?
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 7:56 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> This commit adds support for VP8 bitstream read methods to the cbs
> codec. This enables the trace_headers bitstream filter to support VP8,
> in addition to AV1, H.264, H.265, and VP9. This can be
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 6:25 PM James Almer wrote:
> On 11/5/2023 4:57 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 4:24 AM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >
> >> Please suggest candidates in replies to this email, with a short
>
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 4:24 AM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Please suggest candidates in replies to this email, with a short
> description of how they contribute to the project.
>
Myself, please. I currently maintain the VP8/VP9 decoders and sometimes
review AV1-related work also, although James
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 3:46 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Ronald S. Bultje (12023-10-29):
> > *You* may well end up not accepting their offered help, and that's your
> > call to make. But if others in our community end up accepting their
> offered
> > help, there's no
Hi Nicolas,
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 12:47 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Rémi Denis-Courmont (12023-10-29):
> > And unfortunately, I do believe that Ronald is correct in pointing out
> > that big companies will want oversight in exchange for money.
>
> And this is why the only acceptable answer is:
Hi Thilo,
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 11:31 AM Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> What this is about, is to set up a way to properly spend the SPI money
> aside
> from travel & hw. Why we should not do it because some companies
> beurocracy, I
> cannot see.
>
I
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:45 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> This is financial sustainability Plan A (SPI)
> ATM SPI has like 150k $, we do not activly seek donations, we do not
> currently
> use SPI money to fund any development. SPI money is ultimately controlled
> by
> the FFmpeg
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:14 PM Vittorio Giovara <
vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tbh while it's great that this functionality exists *somewhere* in ffmpeg,
> this is really something that should belong to the scaler filter (whichever
> implementation)
>
I agree. The reason this was
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 11:16 AM Vittorio Giovara <
vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:11 AM Lynne wrote:
> > colorspace doesn't make it impossible to introduce all that is needed.
> > It's a cleaner codebase that we can extend.
>
> * that only works on a subset
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 5:05 PM Vignesh Venkat wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:23 AM Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:53 PM Vignesh Venkatasubramanian via
> ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> >>
> >> SVT-AV1
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:53 PM Vignesh Venkatasubramanian via ffmpeg-devel <
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> SVT-AV1 does not support requesting keyframes at arbitrary points
> by setting pic_type to EB_AV1_KEY_PICTURE. So set force_key_frames
> to 1 only when gop_size == 1.
>
> Please see
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 4:15 AM Dawid Kozinski/Multimedia (PLT) /SRPOL/Staff
Engineer/Samsung Electronics wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Ronald
> > S. Bultje
> > Sent: poniedziałek, 2 października 2023
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 4:32 AM Dawid Kozinski
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dawid Kozinski
> ---
> libavcodec/hevcpred_template.c | 11 ---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/hevcpred_template.c
> b/libavcodec/hevcpred_template.c
> index
Hi Vignesh,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:14 AM Vignesh Venkatasubramanian via
ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> SVT-AV1 does not support requesting keyframes at arbitrary points
> by setting pic_type to EB_AV1_KEY_PICTURE.
>
> This patch changes the following:
> * Set pic_type to EB_AV1_KEY_PICTURE only
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:27 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (12023-09-27):
> > With SDR they do ask for a seperate library.
>
> And they are being dishonest in that. Nothing successful starts as a
> library
>
Didn't dav1d start as a library? (Or maybe it's not very
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:16 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Should i ask the counter-question ?
> are the developers who have less than 10 commits since 2017 abusing
> something
> by organizing and rallying the people against SDR, against the domain owner
> and against me ?
>
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 6:45 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> I disagree
> * Who is and is not a member of the GA is in flux, there can be disputes
> even on GA membership.
> * You cannot have something owned by a group like that. There needs to be
> an individual like a
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:09 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Kyle Swanson wrote:
> > Gitlab (or something like Gitlab)
> > -
> >
> > - Ronald is proposing that we move to Gitlab, or something similar
> >
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 1:40 PM Marton Balint wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2023, Kyle Swanson wrote:
> > DNS
> > ---
> >
> > - Currently the DNS of ffmpeg.org is managed by Fabrice
> > - Michael was asked if he has control over the ffmpeg.org DNS
> register.
> > - Michael says he thinks he
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 9:10 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:42:17PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> [...]
> > Propose a talk, from 5min to 30min.
>
> As i will not be at the conference, here are some quick words
>
I really think you should reconsider this
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:42 PM Nicolas George wrote:
> James Almer (12023-08-25):
> > As i said on IRC,
>
> A medium that can only be accessed by a small fraction of the
> contributors due to timeliness constraints.
>
I suspect you misunderstand IRC. With matrix, a bouncer or a 24/7
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 7:31 AM kobrineli wrote:
> From: Eli Kobrin
>
> We've been fuzzing torchvision with [sydr-fuzz](
> https://github.com/ispras/oss-sydr-fuzz)
> and found out of bounds error in ffmpeg project at audioconvert.c:51.
> To prevent error we need to insert corresponding
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:13 PM Vignesh Venkat <
vigneshv-at-google@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:27 PM James Almer wrote:
> >
> > On 6/28/2023 8:25 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 28,
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:10 PM Dai, Jianhui J <
jianhui.j.dai-at-intel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Dai,
> > Jianhui J
> > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 12:26 PM
> > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v5]
1 - 100 of 1877 matches
Mail list logo
