Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > I'm still for removing this. Please provide a new commit message. > I added 10-bit support to native decoder. This is a good reason for the removal. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > Because there is not more maintainer for this, I will > push this very soon. I will try to maintain it for the foreseeable future. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/14/2016 11:53 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes: > >> Because there is not more maintainer for this, I will >> push this very soon. > > I will try to maintain it for the foreseeable future. > > Carl Eugen How do you plan to get around the fact the only working

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/10/16, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > * Upstream libutvideo doesn't build as a lib, and Linux is not supported. > It has no API. > * The fork that was used as an argument to keep support is *also* broken and > unmaintained now, and it's maintainer/author is fine

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

James Almer gmail.com> writes: > How do you plan to get around the fact the only working > version of this library is an obscure outdated fork that > doesn't even compile on most OSes I am sorry, I did not realize this: On which system does it not compile? Carl Eugen

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > On 2/10/2016 4:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > I'm fine by this, but it would be nice to have SIMD > > and 10 bit support in decoder. > > I agree with the latter. > > I'd argue, however, we don't actually support 10-bit via the > wrapper anyway, since you

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > On 2/12/2016 5:03 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > make install (as root)and then build FFmpeg with > > libutvideo support. > > Last time I tried this, it failed to configure, due to > duplicated symbol 'main'. It works fine here for 32 and 64 bit for

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > On 2/10/2016 4:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > I'm fine by this, but it would be nice to have SIMD and > > 10 bit support in decoder. > > I agree with the latter. > > I'd argue, however, we don't actually support 10-bit via the > wrapper anyway, since you

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/12/2016 5:03 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > make install (as root)and then build FFmpeg with >> libutvideo support. Last time I tried this, it failed to configure, due to duplicated symbol 'main'. - Derek ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/12/2016 11:51 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: On 2/10/2016 4:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: I'm fine by this, but it would be nice to have SIMD and 10 bit support in decoder. I agree with the latter. I'd argue, however, we don't actually support 10-bit via

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > On 2/12/2016 2:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > It works here with a repo I found on my hard disc > > This means nothing to users, unless you want to mail > your harddisk to each user. It works fine after "git pull". How do I ask git where it pulled

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/12/2016 9:24 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: On 2/10/2016 4:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: I'm fine by this, but it would be nice to have SIMD and 10 bit support in decoder. I agree with the latter. I'd argue, however, we don't actually support 10-bit via

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Hi, On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > > > On 2/12/2016 2:24 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > It works here with a repo I found on my hard disc > > > > This means nothing to users, unless you want to mail > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/10/2016 4:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > I'm fine by this, but it would be nice to have SIMD and 10 bit support > in decoder. I agree with the latter. I'd argue, however, we don't actually support 10-bit via the wrapper anyway, since you can't even build the library. ;) - Derek

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

* Upstream libutvideo doesn't build as a lib, and Linux is not supported. It has no API. * The fork that was used as an argument to keep support is *also* broken and unmaintained now, and it's maintainer/author is fine with removal. * A third fork on github, *also* doesn't work. * The only

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/10/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > >> * The ASM in libutvideo doesn't even work on x86_64. > > Just to make sure (I am only guessing): > 32bit libutvideo (on 64bit) is faster than 64bit native decoder / encoder? Maybe on Windows. On

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

On 2/10/16, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > * Upstream libutvideo doesn't build as a lib, and Linux is not supported. > It has no API. > * The fork that was used as an argument to keep support is *also* broken and > unmaintained now, and it's maintainer/author is fine

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Remove libutvideo support

Derek Buitenhuis gmail.com> writes: > * The ASM in libutvideo doesn't even work on x86_64. Just to make sure (I am only guessing): 32bit libutvideo (on 64bit) is faster than 64bit native decoder / encoder? Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list