Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

On 6/19/2016 4:52 PM, Thomas Mundt wrote: > James Almer schrieb am So, 19.6.2016: >> On 2/7/2016 8:39 PM, Thomas Mundt wrote: >>> + at item deint >>> +Specify which frames to deinterlace. Accept one of the following >>> +values: >>> + >>> + at table @option >>> + at item 0, all >>> +Deinterlace

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

James Almer schrieb am So, 19.6.2016: >On 2/7/2016 8:39 PM, Thomas Mundt wrote: >> + at item deint >> +Specify which frames to deinterlace. Accept one of the following >> +values: >> + >> + at table @option >> + at item 0, all >> +Deinterlace all frames. >> + at item 1, interlaced >> +Only

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

On 2/7/2016 8:39 PM, Thomas Mundt wrote: > +@item deint > +Specify which frames to deinterlace. Accept one of the following > +values: > + > +@table @option > +@item 0, all > +Deinterlace all frames. > +@item 1, interlaced > +Only deinterlace frames marked as interlaced. > +@end table > + > +The

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

>>> Paul B Mahol schrieb am Mi, 17.2.2016: > If nobody plans to comment on code I will apply this soon. I´ve seen you applied it. Thanks. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

On 2/16/16, Thomas Mundt wrote: Paul B Mahol schrieb am Di, 16.2.2016: > On 2/8/16, Thomas Mundt wrote: >> Hendrik Leppkes schrieb am Mo, 8.2.2016: How does the speed

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

>>> Paul B Mahol schrieb am Di, 16.2.2016: On 2/8/16, Thomas Mundt wrote: > Hendrik Leppkes schrieb am Mo, 8.2.2016: >>> How does the speed compare to YADIF? >>> Or in other words, is it usable in real-time, or

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

>>> Paul B Mahol schrieb am Di, 16.2.2016:On 2/8/16, Thomas >>> Mundt wrote: > Hendrik Leppkes schrieb am Mo, 8.2.2016: >>> How does the speed compare to YADIF? >>> Or in other words, is it usable in real-time, or

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

On 2/8/16, Thomas Mundt wrote: Hendrik Leppkes schrieb am Mo, 8.2.2016: >> How does the speed compare to YADIF? >> Or in other words, is it usable in real-time, or rather designed for >> offline processing? >> > YADIF is quicker, because

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

I forgot one information: With yadif and w3fdif the temporal interpolation of the first and last field of a source file tend to result in heavy artefacts at fast motions. Therefore BobWeaver uses spatial cubic interpolation at first and last field. That´s the filter_intra function. I attached

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Thomas Mundt wrote: > I forgot one information: > With yadif and w3fdif the temporal interpolation of the first and last field > of a source file tend to result in heavy artefacts at fast motions. Therefore > BobWeaver uses

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

>>> Hendrik Leppkes schrieb am Mo, 8.2.2016: > How does the speed compare to YADIF? > Or in other words, is it usable in real-time, or rather designed for > offline processing? > YADIF is quicker, because of its CPU optimizations. Without CPU optimizations BobWeaver is

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add BobWeaver deinterlacing filter

Hi, last years I did many quality tests with commercial broadcast transcoder software for SD/HD conversions. Aside from few exeptions the weak point always was the deinterlacer. This was even more visible with new OLED monitors. Here artefacts from edge directed interpolation are much more