Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 12/10/17, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): >> And how do you know that? >> >> Only users you care about are mplayer users. > > Stop your nonsensical ad-hominem attacks. You are wasting your time and > mine. > > The patch as is is rejected, I have given reasons. Update it or di

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): > And how do you know that? > > Only users you care about are mplayer users. Stop your nonsensical ad-hominem attacks. You are wasting your time and mine. The patch as is is rejected, I have given reasons. Update it or discuss them. But I will no longer answer to ad-ho

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 12/10/17, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): >> I spent enought time porting this filter and do not intend to waste any >> more >> time in void discussion with your ego. > > Keep your ad-hominem attacks for yourself. It is not a matter about me, > it is a matter about the usabil

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): > I spent enought time porting this filter and do not intend to waste any more > time in void discussion with your ego. Keep your ad-hominem attacks for yourself. It is not a matter about me, it is a matter about the usability of the project. The patch as is is unaccept

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 12/10/17, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): >> Just leave for once. > > I have "left" with you more times than I can count. Not today. > Committing like this would be bad for the users, and you can make it > good with not much effort. > > If you do not care about the good of th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): > Just leave for once. I have "left" with you more times than I can count. Not today. Committing like this would be bad for the users, and you can make it good with not much effort. If you do not care about the good of the users, then why are you contributing to the pro

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 12/10/17, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): >> I will then just apply this. > > No, you will not. You will discuss a solution that is good for the > project as a whole. > >> If Carl Eugen can ignore you, I can too. > > Two wrongs do not make a right. > > If you feel you have be

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): > I will then just apply this. No, you will not. You will discuss a solution that is good for the project as a whole. > If Carl Eugen can ignore you, I can too. Two wrongs do not make a right. If you feel you have been wronged by Carl Eugene, then complain about it wi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 12/10/17, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): >> That is very extreme step, if you insist on such step. >> >> Could you please change your statement? > > I do not understand what you mean. > > For users, having several filters that do almost exactly the same thing > is confusing.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): > That is very extreme step, if you insist on such step. > > Could you please change your statement? I do not understand what you mean. For users, having several filters that do almost exactly the same thing is confusing. It should be avoided, with the convenience of u

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 12/10/17, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): >> For increased tempo it have much better quality. >> For decreased tempo is have similar quality. >> >> Also it have more options and is more configurable >> and have increased range of tempo scaling. > > Is there any benefit in ate

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2017-12-10): > For increased tempo it have much better quality. > For decreased tempo is have similar quality. > > Also it have more options and is more configurable > and have increased range of tempo scaling. Is there any benefit in atempo, then? If not, then this filter should r

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 12/10/17, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (2017-12-02): >> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol >> --- >> libavfilter/Makefile| 1 + >> libavfilter/af_scaletempo.c | 529 >> >> libavfilter/allfilters.c| 1 + >> 3 files changed, 531 inse

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-10 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (2017-12-02): > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol > --- > libavfilter/Makefile| 1 + > libavfilter/af_scaletempo.c | 529 > > libavfilter/allfilters.c| 1 + > 3 files changed, 531 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 libavfilter/

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: port scaletempo filter from mpv

2017-12-02 Thread Paul B Mahol
Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol --- libavfilter/Makefile| 1 + libavfilter/af_scaletempo.c | 529 libavfilter/allfilters.c| 1 + 3 files changed, 531 insertions(+) create mode 100644 libavfilter/af_scaletempo.c diff --git a/libavfilter/Ma