On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:27:25AM +0100, tomas.har...@codemill.se wrote:
> On 2014-10-28 23:38, Thomas Mundt wrote:
> >Carl Eugen, I changed the indentations and attached a unified diff.
> >Since I´m on windows I used turtoise git. I hope that´s okay.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Thomas
>
> Looks good to m
On 2014-10-28 23:38, Thomas Mundt wrote:
Carl Eugen, I changed the indentations and attached a unified diff.
Since I´m on windows I used turtoise git. I hope that´s okay.
Regards,
Thomas
Looks good to me
/Tomas
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-d
Carl Eugen, I changed the indentations and attached a unified diff. Since I´m
on windows I used turtoise git. I hope that´s okay.
Regards,
Thomas
avci_mxf.diff
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg
Okay. I will do so next patch.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Tuesday 28 October 2014 03:36:05 pm Thomas Mundt wrote:
> -mxf_write_cdci_common(s, st, mxf_mpegvideo_descriptor_key, 8+5);
> -// bit rate
> -mxf_write_local_tag(pb, 4, 0x8000);
> -avio_wb32(pb, sc->video_bit_rate);
> -
> -// profile and level
> -mxf_write_local_tag(pb, 1
I´m not happy with the for-loop I coded yesterday night, so I made a new patch.
Regards,
Thomas
--- a/libavformat/mxfenc.c
+++ b/libavformat/mxfenc.c
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
#include "libavutil/time_internal.h"
#include "libavcodec/bytestream.h"
#include "libavcodec/dnxhddata.h"
+#include "libavcod
@ Michael: Sorry, I`m subscribed now. CODEC_ID_H264 changed.
@ Kieran: Maybe this would make sense as an option. But in a future step. :-)
@ Tomas:Thanks for your suggestions!The component_depth part was taken from
Michael´s patch last month. But it also can be changed to 10 bit fixed for AVCI.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:21:12PM +, Thomas Mundt wrote:
> Hi, I´ve seen that there has been approach last month to implement AVC Intra
> mxf muxing. I tested the patches, but it didn´t work with any of my samples.
> Since there also has been discussions about the gpl restriction, I rewrote
On 27 October 2014 17:21, Thomas Mundt wrote:
> Hi, I´ve seen that there has been approach last month to implement AVC Intra
> mxf muxing. I tested the patches, but it didn´t work with any of my samples.
> Since there also has been discussions about the gpl restriction, I rewrote
> the patch. I
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 17:21 +, Thomas Mundt wrote:
> Hi, I´ve seen that there has been approach last month to implement AVC Intra
> mxf muxing. I tested the patches, but it didn´t work with any of my samples.
> Since there also has been discussions about the gpl restriction, I rewrote
> the
Hi, I´ve seen that there has been approach last month to implement AVC Intra
mxf muxing. I tested the patches, but it didn´t work with any of my samples.
Since there also has been discussions about the gpl restriction, I rewrote the
patch. I had some basics, because I had written a working patch
11 matches
Mail list logo
