On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floati
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs F
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>>
>> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C
On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>
> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf,
> fmin, fminf functions. This patch adds them,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> >> functions is beneficial, in
Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes:
> > Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> >> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
> >
> > Please provide actual numbers for this patch.
>
> For a change, why do
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> >> functions is beneficial, in t
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>>> functions is beneficial, in the contex
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes:
>
>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>
> Please provide actual numbers for this patch.
For a change, wh
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
>> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>>
>> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
>
> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf,
> fmin, fminf functions. Thi
Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes:
> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
Please provide actual numbers for this patch.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing l
It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point
functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS.
Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf,
fmin, fminf functions. This patch adds them, thus making their usage in
FFmpeg safe.
Signed-off-by: Gan
13 matches
Mail list logo
