Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point > functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. > > Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf, > fmin, fminf functions.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes: > It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point > functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. Please provide actual numbers for this patch. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point >> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. >> >> Unfortunately, MSVC

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf functions. This patch adds them, thus making their usage in FFmpeg safe. Signed-off-by:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point >>>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > wrote: >> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >>> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point >>>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis >> wrote: >>> On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes: > > Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes: > > > >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point > >> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. > > > > Please provide actual numbers for this patch. > > For a change, why

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point > functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. > > Unfortunately, MSVC 2012 (and earlier) lack the ISO C99 fmax, fmaxf, > fmin, fminf functions. This patch adds them,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 10/15/2015 1:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point >> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. >> >> Unfortunately, MSVC 2012

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point > >> functions is

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Ganesh Ajjanagadde gmail.com> writes: > >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point >> functions is beneficial, in the context of fabs() vs FFABS. > > Please provide actual numbers for this

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure, avutil/libm: add fmax, fmaxf, fmin, fminf support

Hi, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > >> It has been demonstrated that using libc provided floating point >