On 01.11.2014, at 13:45, Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to set the profile to use VDPAU.
In addition, ASP is a superset of SP, so there is not
even a good reason to require it.
Are there still objections?
As said, to
Reimar Döffinger Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de writes:
Are there still objections?
I just wanted to know if we shouldn't always set ASP?
Or at least for everything != SP?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 10:02:50AM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Reimar Döffinger Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de writes:
Are there still objections?
I just wanted to know if we shouldn't always set ASP?
Or at least for everything != SP?
I am unsure. It seemed to me this way would be more
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to set the profile to use VDPAU.
In addition, ASP is a superset of SP, so there is not
even a good reason to require it.
---
libavcodec/vdpau_mpeg4.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vdpau_mpeg4.c
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 13:45:46 +0100
Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to set the profile to use VDPAU.
It still doesn't...?
There are basically 3 ffmpeg vdpau hwaccel APIs now.
In addition, ASP is a superset of SP, so
Reimar Döffinger Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de writes:
+case FF_PROFILE_UNKNOWN:
case FF_PROFILE_MPEG4_ADVANCED_SIMPLE:
profile = VDP_DECODER_PROFILE_MPEG4_PART2_ASP;
Could instead be the default case to set profile to ASP?
Or to remove this whole logic?
Carl Eugen
On 01 Nov, Reimar Döffinger wrote :
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to set the profile to use VDPAU.
If you don't set the profile, how can you know that the hardware
supports it?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic
Jean-Baptiste Kempf jb at videolan.org writes:
On 01 Nov, Reimar Döffinger wrote :
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to set the profile to use VDPAU.
If you don't set the profile, how can you know that
the hardware supports it?
Does this have any relevance for
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:18:06PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On 01 Nov, Reimar Döffinger wrote :
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to set the profile to use VDPAU.
If you don't set the profile, how can you know that the hardware
supports it?
Firstly: As I
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:52:17PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 13:45:46 +0100
Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to set the profile to use VDPAU.
It still doesn't...?
It does if you want the hwaccel API.
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 15:13:17 +0100
Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:52:17PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 13:45:46 +0100
Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
This is a regression, previous code did not require
users to
11 matches
Mail list logo