On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:13:53PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-03-11 17:06 GMT+01:00 James Almer :
> > As discussed before, mmx, mmxext and sse functions that have also an sse2
> > version, and
> > 3dnow/3dnowext functions that have also an sse version, have no reason to
> >
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Christophe Gisquet <
christophe.gisq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-03-13 14:34 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> >> They will not be used in any real world scenario.
> >
> > well it could be usefull in debuging in same cases
> > especially if all mmx cod
Hi,
2015-03-13 14:34 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>> They will not be used in any real world scenario.
>
> well it could be usefull in debuging in same cases
> especially if all mmx code is disabled on x86_64, for any single
> function its not too likely
I believe fate and proper bug reports a
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:06:23PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 11/03/15 11:29 AM, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2015-03-11 15:20 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> >> personally iam in favor of more things being tested, but iam fine
> >> with either
> >
> > I'll see what the opinion
Hi,
2015-03-11 17:06 GMT+01:00 James Almer :
> As discussed before, mmx, mmxext and sse functions that have also an sse2
> version, and
> 3dnow/3dnowext functions that have also an sse version, have no reason to
> exist in an
> x86_64 build.
I think the reason may have been someone tinkering on
2015-03-11 2:26 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> this breaks
> make libavcodec/dct-test
> ...
> LD libavcodec/dct-test
> libavcodec/dct-test.o:(.rodata+0xe8): undefined reference to
> `ff_xvid_idct_mmx'
> libavcodec/dct-test.o:(.rodata+0x108): undefined reference to
> `ff_xvid_idct_mmxext'
On 11/03/15 11:29 AM, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-03-11 15:20 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>> personally iam in favor of more things being tested, but iam fine
>> with either
>
> I'll see what the opinions are in ~30H then. It looks to be around
> 4.5KB more data, which isn't huge
Hi,
2015-03-11 15:20 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> personally iam in favor of more things being tested, but iam fine
> with either
I'll see what the opinions are in ~30H then. It looks to be around
4.5KB more data, which isn't huge, and doesn't cause a noticeable
increase in compile time.
--
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:09:51PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> 2015-03-11 2:26 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> > this breaks
> > make libavcodec/dct-test
> > ...
> > LD libavcodec/dct-test
> > libavcodec/dct-test.o:(.rodata+0xe8): undefined reference to
> > `ff_xvid_idct_mmx'
> > lib
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:11:52PM +, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Also reduce the table duplication with SSE2 code, remove duplicated
> macro parameters.
> ---
> libavcodec/x86/Makefile| 3 +-
> libavcodec/x86/xvididct.asm| 450 -
> libavcodec/x86/
Also reduce the table duplication with SSE2 code, remove duplicated
macro parameters.
---
libavcodec/x86/Makefile| 3 +-
libavcodec/x86/xvididct.asm| 450 -
libavcodec/x86/xvididct_init.c | 40 ++-
libavcodec/x86/xvididct_mmx.c | 549
11 matches
Mail list logo
