> On 12 Jan 2021, at 02:41, Andreas Rheinhardt
> wrote:
> Of course I am all ears for how to make it clear that someone who
> modifies the strings also needs to check the array dimensions.
I think I kind of agree with the other comments, this would/should
rather have to be something that can
Marton Balint:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>
>> When the difference of the longest size and the average size of
>> collection of strings is smaller than the size of a pointer, it makes
>> sense to store the strings directly in an array instead of using an
>> array of
On 06/01/2021 09:34, Marton Balint wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
When the difference of the longest size and the average size of
collection of strings is smaller than the size of a pointer, it makes
sense to store the strings directly in an array instead of using an
array
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
When the difference of the longest size and the average size of
collection of strings is smaller than the size of a pointer, it makes
sense to store the strings directly in an array instead of using an
array of pointers to strings (unless doing so
When the difference of the longest size and the average size of
collection of strings is smaller than the size of a pointer, it makes
sense to store the strings directly in an array instead of using an
array of pointers to strings (unless doing so precludes deduplicating
strings); doing so also
