On 3/12/2021 7:10 PM, Lynne wrote:
Mar 12, 2021, 21:00 by jamr...@gmail.com:
On 3/12/2021 4:42 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Related to this, what do the flags passed into get_encoder_buffer() mean
exactly ?
are they "hints" so that a new/unknown flag can be ignored by an implementation
Mar 12, 2021, 21:00 by jamr...@gmail.com:
> On 3/12/2021 4:42 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>>
>> Related to this, what do the flags passed into get_encoder_buffer() mean
>> exactly ?
>> are they "hints" so that a new/unknown flag can be ignored by an
>> implementation
>> or what else shoul
On 22/02/2021 22:27, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 6:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
This callback is functionally the same as get
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 04:59:16PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 4:46 PM, James Almer wrote:
> > On 3/12/2021 4:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > > On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > > On Thu,
Andreas Rheinhardt:
> Michael Niedermayer:
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:59:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb
On 3/12/2021 5:11 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 3/12/2021 4:46 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 3/12/2021 4:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:3
James Almer:
> On 3/12/2021 4:46 PM, James Almer wrote:
>> On 3/12/2021 4:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>
On 3/12/2021 4:42 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:30:23PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3
On 3/12/2021 4:46 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 3/12/2021 4:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Ni
On 3/12/2021 4:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:30:23PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > > On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermay
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:59:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote
On 3/12/2021 1:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:59:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/10/2021 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at
Michael Niedermayer:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:59:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/10/2021 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:27:34PM -03
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:18:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:59:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > On 3/10/2021 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:27:34PM -0300, James Almer wrote
On 3/11/2021 1:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:59:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 3/10/2021 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:27:34PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 6:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thomp
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:59:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:27:34PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > On 2/21/2021 6:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
> > > > On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
> > > > > On 21/02/2021
On 3/10/2021 5:18 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:27:34PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 6:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 1
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:27:34PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 2/21/2021 6:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
> > On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
> > > On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
> > > > On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
> > > > > On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
>
On 3/8/2021 5:48 PM, Lynne wrote:
Mar 8, 2021, 21:31 by jamr...@gmail.com:
On 2/22/2021 7:27 PM, James Almer wrote:
Looked at bit into this. AVCodec->encode2() based encoders don't support
returning EAGAIN at all, as it completely breaks the frame threading logic. It
would require a consid
Mar 8, 2021, 21:31 by jamr...@gmail.com:
> On 2/22/2021 7:27 PM, James Almer wrote:
>
>>
>> Looked at bit into this. AVCodec->encode2() based encoders don't support
>> returning EAGAIN at all, as it completely breaks the frame threading logic.
>> It would require a considerable rewrite in order
On 2/22/2021 7:27 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 6:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
This callback is functionally the same as get
On 2/21/2021 6:04 PM, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for
decoders, and
implement
Feb 21, 2021, 22:04 by jamr...@gmail.com:
> On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
>
>> On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
>>>
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
> This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2()
On 2/21/2021 5:29 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for
decoders, and
implements for the new encode API the functionality
On 21/02/2021 20:00, James Almer wrote:
On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for decoders, and
implements for the new encode API the functionality of the old encode API had
where the user co
On 2/21/2021 4:13 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for
decoders, and
implements for the new encode API the functionality of the old encode
API had
where the user could provide their own buffers.
Signed-
On 21/02/2021 17:35, James Almer wrote:
This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for decoders, and
implements for the new encode API the functionality of the old encode API had
where the user could provide their own buffers.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
Used the names Lynne
On 2/21/2021 2:59 PM, Lynne wrote:
Feb 21, 2021, 18:35 by jamr...@gmail.com:
This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for decoders, and
implements for the new encode API the functionality of the old encode API had
where the user could provide their own buffers.
Signed-off-by:
Feb 21, 2021, 18:35 by jamr...@gmail.com:
> This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for decoders, and
> implements for the new encode API the functionality of the old encode API had
> where the user could provide their own buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Used th
This callback is functionally the same as get_buffer2() is for decoders, and
implements for the new encode API the functionality of the old encode API had
where the user could provide their own buffers.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
Used the names Lynne suggested this time, plus a line about how
31 matches
Mail list logo
