> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Soft Works
> Sent: Sunday, January 2, 2022 7:16 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Sunday, January 2, 2022 3:04 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> 2 Jan 2022, 04:28 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>
> >
2 Jan 2022, 04:28 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Soft Works
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 10:58 PM
>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Gi
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Soft Works
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 10:58 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> One component of the GitHub "Bridge"
Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2021-12-26 22:37:54)
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
> > be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
> >
>
> No, it's not strictly related to that - they want
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Niklas Haas
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 10:22 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:59:58 +1000 Zane van Iperen
> wrote:
>
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:59:58 +1000 Zane van Iperen
wrote:
>
>
> On 27/12/21 11:41, lance.lmw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 04:37:54PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm not sure. My
Not advocating for github (per this thread it's out of scope), but I think
using a self-hosted gitlab with an option to auth using github account
would help in reducing the "account overhead" at least for those who use
github.
пн, 27 дек. 2021 г., 17:59 Zane van Iperen :
>
>
> On 27/12/21 11:41,
On 27/12/21 11:41, lance.lmw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 04:37:54PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
No,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 04:37:54PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
> > be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
> >
>
> No, it's not strictly related to that
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Ronald S.
> Bultje
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2021 10:38 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 202
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
> I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
> be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
>
No, it's not strictly related to that - they want something that is CLI
accessible. Gitlab has this here:
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2021 5:49 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> 26 Dec 2021, 02:03 by l...@chinaffmpeg.org:
>
> >
eg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
>>>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>>>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>>>>
>>>> 23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
&
t;>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>>>
>>> 23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> holidays are approaching and I got a litt
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 05:15:19PM +, Soft Works wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> > Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> > Subject: R
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> 23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>
23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
> even though it won’t be something for everybody.
>
> A while ago I had committed to prepare a test setup for integrating
> GitHub in a similar way as the Git developers
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Michael
> Niedermayer
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 12:12 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 12:31:
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Vasily
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 10:32 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bri
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 12:31:56PM +0300, Vasily wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
> misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
> really explicit?
>
> Second one, why first-comers aren't allowed to submit
Typo correction: "the bot should remove", not "the boy" (oh my mobile
tapping...)
сб, 25 дек. 2021 г., 12:31 Vasily :
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
> misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
> really
Hi,
First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
really explicit?
Second one, why first-comers aren't allowed to submit without pre-approval?
(context: I haven't made my contributions to
> -Original Message-
> From: Soft Works
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 12:25 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: GitHub Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
> even though it won’t be something for
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Timo
> Rothenpieler
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 3:17 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> On 23.12.2021 14:59, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Tomas
> Härdin
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 3:00 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> ons 2021-12-22 klockan 23:24 +
On 23.12.2021 14:59, Tomas Härdin wrote:
This sounds like something that will cause problems in the long run.
Github will inevitably be brought into the project's workflow. People
will start submitting tickets on Github rather than our trac. And so
on.
issues are disabled on Github.
Otherwise,
ons 2021-12-22 klockan 23:24 + skrev Soft Works:
> Hi,
>
> holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
> even though it won’t be something for everybody.
>
> A while ago I had committed to prepare a test setup for integrating
> GitHub in a similar way as the Git
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Paul B
> Mahol
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 8:36 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> Topic name is deeply misleading.
Wh
Topic name is deeply misleading.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Hi,
holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
even though it won’t be something for everybody.
A while ago I had committed to prepare a test setup for integrating
GitHub in a similar way as the Git developers are doing.
For those who missed it or don’t remember the
31 matches
Mail list logo
