On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 02:53:34PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> > On 29.10.2022 14:36, * Neustradamus * wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > It is possible to remove all releases from GitHub?
> > > Because at right, we can
On 29.10.2022 14:36, * Neustradamus * wrote:
Hello all,
It is possible to remove all releases from GitHub?
Because at right, we can see and it is not good promotion for this active
project:
- https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg
Releases 11
FFmpeg 3.0 Release
Latest on 15 Feb 2016
+ 10 releases
-
Hello all,
It is possible to remove all releases from GitHub?
Because at right, we can see and it is not good promotion for this active
project:
- https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg
Releases 11
FFmpeg 3.0 Release
Latest on 15 Feb 2016
+ 10 releases
- https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/releases
The
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Soft Works
> Sent: Sunday, January 2, 2022 7:16 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Sunday, January 2, 2022 3:04 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> 2 Jan 2022, 04:28 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>
> >
2 Jan 2022, 04:28 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Soft Works
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 10:58 PM
>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub In
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Soft Works
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 10:58 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> One component of the GitHub "Bridge"
Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2021-12-26 22:37:54)
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
> > be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
> >
>
> No, it's not strictly related to that - they want somethin
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Niklas Haas
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 10:22 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:59:58 +1000 Zane van Iperen
> wrote:
>
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:59:58 +1000 Zane van Iperen
wrote:
>
>
> On 27/12/21 11:41, lance.lmw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 04:37:54PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm not sure. My interpretation
Not advocating for github (per this thread it's out of scope), but I think
using a self-hosted gitlab with an option to auth using github account
would help in reducing the "account overhead" at least for those who use
github.
пн, 27 дек. 2021 г., 17:59 Zane van Iperen :
>
>
> On 27/12/21 11:41,
On 27/12/21 11:41, lance.lmw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 04:37:54PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
No, i
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 04:37:54PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
> > be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
> >
>
> No, it's not strictly related to that -
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Ronald S.
> Bultje
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2021 10:38 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 202
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 3:21 PM Soft Works wrote:
> I'm not sure. My interpretation of Lance' and Steven's comments would
> be that they'd prefer to stick to the ML.
>
No, it's not strictly related to that - they want something that is CLI
accessible. Gitlab has this here: https://glab.read
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2021 5:49 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> 26 Dec 2021, 02:03 by l...@chinaffmpeg.org:
>
> >
eg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
>>>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>>>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>>>>
>>>> 23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>&
t;>> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
>>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>>>
>>> 23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> holidays are approaching and I got a litt
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 05:15:19PM +, Soft Works wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> > Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> > Subject: R
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 5:50 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> 23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
>
>
23 Dec 2021, 00:24 by softwo...@hotmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
> even though it won’t be something for everybody.
>
> A while ago I had committed to prepare a test setup for integrating
> GitHub in a similar way as the Git developers are
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Michael
> Niedermayer
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 12:12 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 12:31:
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Vasily
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2021 10:32 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging tha
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 12:31:56PM +0300, Vasily wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
> misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
> really explicit?
>
> Second one, why first-comers aren't allowed to submit wi
Typo correction: "the bot should remove", not "the boy" (oh my mobile
tapping...)
сб, 25 дек. 2021 г., 12:31 Vasily :
> Hi,
>
> First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
> misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
> really explicit?
Hi,
First off, a great idea bridging that gap! But I agree that the topic is
misleading, maybe rename to smth like "github bridge for PR creation" to be
really explicit?
Second one, why first-comers aren't allowed to submit without pre-approval?
(context: I haven't made my contributions to ffmpeg
> -Original Message-
> From: Soft Works
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 12:25 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: GitHub Integration
>
> Hi,
>
> holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
> even though it won’t be something for eve
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Timo
> Rothenpieler
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 3:17 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> On 23.12.2021 14:59, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> > This s
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Tomas
> Härdin
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 3:00 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> ons 2021-12-22 klockan 23:24 +
On 23.12.2021 14:59, Tomas Härdin wrote:
This sounds like something that will cause problems in the long run.
Github will inevitably be brought into the project's workflow. People
will start submitting tickets on Github rather than our trac. And so
on.
issues are disabled on Github.
Otherwise,
ons 2021-12-22 klockan 23:24 + skrev Soft Works:
> Hi,
>
> holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
> even though it won’t be something for everybody.
>
> A while ago I had committed to prepare a test setup for integrating
> GitHub in a similar way as the Git devel
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Paul B
> Mahol
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 8:36 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GitHub Integration
>
> Topic name is deeply misleading.
Wh
Topic name is deeply misleading.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Hi,
holidays are approaching and I got a little present for all of you
even though it won’t be something for everybody.
A while ago I had committed to prepare a test setup for integrating
GitHub in a similar way as the Git developers are doing.
For those who missed it or don’t remember the out
fre 2018-04-27 klockan 00:50 +0200 skrev wm4:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:41:55 +0200
> Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
>
> > > On 26. Apr 2018, at 14:40, wm4 wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:12:14 +0200
> > > Hendrik Leppkes mailto:h.lepp...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, at 2:50 PM, wm4 wrote:
>
> That would mostly get rid of the centralization argument. But I've
> heard bad things from someone who wanted to setup a private instance of
> it. Apparently it has a large number of dependencies, is extremely hard
> to deploy (unless you use their d
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:41:55 +0200
Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
> > On 26. Apr 2018, at 14:40, wm4 wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:12:14 +0200
> > Hendrik Leppkes mailto:h.lepp...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Oberhoff
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> Am 2
tor 2018-04-26 klockan 13:15 +0200 skrev Daniel Oberhoff:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github?
> I.e. not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues
> and pull requests? Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think of
> submitting a pr
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:59:03 -0800
Lou Logan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, at 4:40 AM, wm4 wrote:
> >
> > To be fair, I'd prefer the github issue tracker over TRAC any day.
>
> At least it isn't Bugzilla. What are some of the problems with trac? Is there
> a self-hostable bug tracker you pre
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, at 4:40 AM, wm4 wrote:
>
> To be fair, I'd prefer the github issue tracker over TRAC any day.
At least it isn't Bugzilla. What are some of the problems with trac? Is there a
self-hostable bug tracker you prefer?
___
ffmpeg-devel ma
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, 14:42 Daniel Oberhoff,
wrote:
>
> > On 26. Apr 2018, at 14:40, wm4 wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:12:14 +0200
> > Hendrik Leppkes mailto:h.lepp...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Oberhoff
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> Am 26.04.2018 um
> On 26. Apr 2018, at 14:40, wm4 wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:12:14 +0200
> Hendrik Leppkes mailto:h.lepp...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Oberhoff
>> wrote:
>>>
Am 26.04.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
:
> Am 26.04.2018
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:12:14 +0200
Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Oberhoff
> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
> >> :
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:56 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>>
> Am 26.04.2018 um
>>
>> BTW, is there any kind of issue tracking?
>
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/
oh, 1784 issues...
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-dev
On 2018-04-26 13:15, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github?
> I.e. not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and
> pull requests? Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think of
> submitting a pr instead of having to gene
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Oberhoff
wrote:
>
>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
>> :
>>
>>
>>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:56 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
>>> :
>>>
>>>
Am 26.04.2018 um 13:52 schrieb Nicolas George :
Daniel Oberhoff (2018-04-26):
> I was wonderi
> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:59 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
> :
>
>
>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:56 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
>> :
>>
>>
>>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:52 schrieb Nicolas George :
>>>
>>> Daniel Oberhoff (2018-04-26):
I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github?
I.e
> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:56 schrieb Daniel Oberhoff
> :
>
>
>> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:52 schrieb Nicolas George :
>>
>> Daniel Oberhoff (2018-04-26):
>>> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github?
>>> I.e. not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and
>
Daniel Oberhoff (2018-04-26):
> https://hub.github.com/hub.1.html
Thanks. So, how do I read a comment in an issue without a browser?
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel
> Am 26.04.2018 um 13:52 schrieb Nicolas George :
>
> Daniel Oberhoff (2018-04-26):
>> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github?
>> I.e. not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and
>> pull requests? Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think o
Daniel Oberhoff (2018-04-26):
> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github?
> I.e. not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and
> pull requests? Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think of
> submitting a pr instead of having to generate/format/sp
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:15:52 +0200
Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github? I.e.
> not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and pull
> requests? Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think of submitting a
> On 26 Apr 2018, at 12:15, Daniel Oberhoff
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github? I.e.
> not just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and pull
> requests? Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think of submitting a p
Hello,
I was wondering if there is any chance to move development to github? I.e. not
just mirror, but as primary development repo, with issues and pull requests?
Would make collaboration a *lot* easier (think of submitting a pr instead of
having to generate/format/split patches).
Best
Daniel
54 matches
Mail list logo
