> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:19:10 +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>
>> Will push Sunday the 1st if nobody has objected by then.
>
> Nobody has objected and it's been 4 days. Feel free to push now if you
> prefer.
pushed
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:19:10 +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> Will push Sunday the 1st if nobody has objected by then.
Nobody has objected and it's been 4 days. Feel free to push now if you
prefer.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On 4/27/2016 2:17 PM, Ricardo Constantino wrote:
> configure already checks for minimum major version 6 which is the
> first one using MIT license and fails if lower.
Gotcha.
- Derek
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On 27 April 2016 at 13:50, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> I presume there is no way to check the version?
>
configure already checks for minimum major version 6 which is the
first one using MIT license and fails if lower.
___
On 4/23/2016 6:00 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> As the nvEncodeApi.h header is now MIT licensed, this can be dropped.
> The loaded CUDA and NVENC libraries are part of the nvidia driver, and
> thus count as system libraries.
> ---
> configure | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
I presume
Will push Sunday the 1st if nobody has objected by then.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Timo Rothenpieler rothenpieler.org> writes:
> As the nvEncodeApi.h header is now MIT licensed, this can be dropped.
> The loaded CUDA and NVENC libraries are part of the nvidia driver, and
> thus count as system libraries.
If the explanation is correct, the patch is ok imo.
Thank you, Carl
ping
I'd really like some feedback on this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel