On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:48:59PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:17:56 +0100
Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org wrote:
Le septidi 27 nivôse, an CCXXIII, Philip Langdale a écrit :
Right. It is display aspect ratio, not sample aspect ratio. And then
you have the 45/44
L'octidi 28 nivôse, an CCXXIII, Kieran Kunhya a écrit :
I haven't quite followed what's going on to decide whether Nvidia or
FFmpeg is correct.
FFmpeg is correct, there is absolutely no doubt about it: This active
pixels nonsense is only relevant for certain very specific media, definitely
not
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:27:17 +
Kieran Kunhya kier...@obe.tv wrote:
On 17 January 2015 at 18:14, Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org wrote:
Le septidi 27 nivôse, an CCXXIII, Philip Langdale a écrit :
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:17:56 +0100
Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org wrote:
Ok. I did this
On 17 January 2015 at 18:14, Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org wrote:
Le septidi 27 nivôse, an CCXXIII, Philip Langdale a écrit :
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:17:56 +0100
Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org wrote:
Ok. I did this test and it produces correct results - SAR 133:221 which
yields the correct
FFmpeg is correct, there is absolutely no doubt about it: This active
pixels nonsense is only relevant for certain very specific media, definitely
not when encoding testsrc and decoding the result to showinfo. Demuxers or
high-level tools may know when they are dealing with that kind of
On 2015-01-15 23:48, Nicolas George wrote:
Le septidi 27 nivôse, an CCXXIII, Timo Rothenpieler a écrit :
+av_reduce(dw, dh, avctx-sample_aspect_ratio.num,
avctx-sample_aspect_ratio.den, 4096);
+ctx-init_encode_params.darHeight = dw;
+ctx-init_encode_params.darWidth =
Le septidi 27 nivôse, an CCXXIII, Timo Rothenpieler a écrit :
+av_reduce(dw, dh, avctx-sample_aspect_ratio.num,
avctx-sample_aspect_ratio.den, 4096);
+ctx-init_encode_params.darHeight = dw;
+ctx-init_encode_params.darWidth = dh;
Has this been actually tested? dar in
