On Mon, Dec 14, 2015, at 12:24 PM, Ray Cole wrote:
> Quite honestly I decided it isn't worth the frustration of trying to
> submit a patch. It works for me and I'm happy with it.
>
> -- Ray
Our guidelines and peer reviews may seem stringent, but consider it a
quality control to help get the best
Quite honestly I decided it isn't worth the frustration of trying to submit a
patch. It works for me and I'm happy with it.
-- Ray
On 12/14/2015 03:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:02:33AM -0500, Ray Cole wrote:
Here is an updated patch. I cleaned the code up to ho
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:02:33AM -0500, Ray Cole wrote:
> Here is an updated patch. I cleaned the code up to hopefully be closer to
> standards. It works well for me, but your mileage may vary...
>
> --- vf_decimate.c 2015-09-29 10:56:46.171698492 -0500
> +++ vf_decimatex.c2015-09-29 1
Here is an updated patch. I cleaned the code up to hopefully be closer to
standards. It works well for me, but your mileage may vary...
--- vf_decimate.c 2015-09-29 10:56:46.171698492 -0500
+++ vf_decimatex.c 2015-09-29 10:59:50.679695685 -0500
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#define INPUT_MAIN
Thank you.
I know I have a number of coding style things to clean up before this could be
accepted (as well as removing some output I'm logging as info) but perhaps
those familiar with the decimate filter can see if the changes being proposed
make sense.
-- Ray
On 09/29/2015 07:32 AM, compn
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:42:53 -0500
Stephen Cole wrote:
> Thank you for the responses. I assumed the comments would suffice for
> discussing it initially so one wouldn't have to interpret the patch. I'll
> produce a diff and resubmit.
A patch is _much_ easier to read.
__
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 21:31:59 -0500
Ray Cole wrote:
> This is the first time I've offered up code to any open source
> project...so be gentle :-)
ehe, patches are what the devs want, either git diff or diff -u...
i've downloaded and diff'ed your filter to ffmpeg git master and
attached it in thi
Thank you for the responses. I assumed the comments would suffice for
discussing it initially so one wouldn't have to interpret the patch. I'll
produce a diff and resubmit.
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:16 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
>> On 9/29/15, Ray Cole wrote:
>> I hope this is the appropriate pl
Ray Cole gmail.com> writes:
> I hope this is the appropriate place to propose an enhancement.
Yes but please read https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ff
On 09/29/2015 12:46 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 9/29/15, Ray Cole wrote:
I hope this is the appropriate place to propose an enhancement. This is the
first time I've offered up code to any open source project...so be gentle
:-)
First, I love ffmpeg. Wonderful software and thank you for your ef
On 9/29/15, Ray Cole wrote:
> I hope this is the appropriate place to propose an enhancement. This is the
> first time I've offered up code to any open source project...so be gentle
> :-)
>
> First, I love ffmpeg. Wonderful software and thank you for your efforts.
>
> I have been pulling down a nu
11 matches
Mail list logo
