Hi,
I'm trying a deep learning model with converts SDR (with format R8G8B8) to HDR
(with format R10G10B10) with ffmpeg. I wrote a video filter with only supported
format AV_PIX_FMT_RGB24 (see code below), it turns out that the format of the
input frame of the filter is R8G8B8, and so the output
libavutil/hwcontext_d3d11va.c: In function 'd3d11va_device_create':
libavutil/hwcontext_d3d11va.c:554:46: warning: passing argument 2 of
'pAdapter->lpVtbl->GetDesc' from incompatible pointer type
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
hr = IDXGIAdapter2_GetDesc(pAdapter, &desc);
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 07:16:43PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jeff (2018-07-23):
> > It seems like libyuv has better performace on scaling than libswscale.
> > So I'm wondering is there anyone has tried integrating libyuv as a
> > scale filter before. I mean link it as a 3rd party lib, and then
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 07:38:16PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
> download |3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 79d69cdda36ee65da6f7348f8397ccbb8fc9854d
> 0001-download-remove-dead-link-for-Mac-binaries.patch
> From f57cec086a22300dbc12f6e998b2cf53d7a8e103 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:05 PM Jacob Trimble wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Trimble
> ---
> libavformat/matroskadec.c | 43 +--
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/matroskadec.c b/libavformat/matroskadec.c
> index
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jacob Trimble wrote:
>
> The attached patch adds parsing for WebM encryption info into the
> AVEncryptionInfo side-data. The AVEncryptionInitInfo will be handled
> in another patch.
>
> Spec: https://www.webmproject.org/docs/webm-encryption/
>
> I am currently seei
Am 19.07.18 um 08:26 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
>
>
>> Am 16.07.2018 um 13:41 schrieb Mina :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch introduces Grey-Edge algorithm as part of the Color Constancy
>> Filter project in GSOC.
>>
>> V4 changes:
>> - Fixed error in filter.texi that resulted in breaking "make
>> do
> On Jul 23, 2018, at 1:16 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Jeff (2018-07-23):
>> It seems like libyuv has better performace on scaling than libswscale.
>> So I'm wondering is there anyone has tried integrating libyuv as a
>> scale filter before. I mean link it as a 3rd party lib, and then call
>> i
Jeff (2018-07-23):
> It seems like libyuv has better performace on scaling than libswscale.
> So I'm wondering is there anyone has tried integrating libyuv as a
> scale filter before. I mean link it as a 3rd party lib, and then call
> it's API through a wrap filter. Just like how libavcodec use lib
Hi there,
It seems like libyuv has better performace on scaling than libswscale. So I'm
wondering is there anyone has tried integrating libyuv as a scale filter
before. I mean link it as a 3rd party lib, and then call it's API through a
wrap filter. Just like how libavcodec use libx264.
If not
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 07:31:12PM +0100, Marcin Gorzel wrote:
> Rematrixing supports up to 64 channels. However, there is only a limited
> number of channel layouts defined. Since the in/out channel count is
> currently obtained from the channel layout, for undefined layouts (e.g. for
> 9, 10,
From f57cec086a22300dbc12f6e998b2cf53d7a8e103 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gyan Doshi
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 19:33:57 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] download: remove dead link for Mac binaries
ffmpegmac.net now leads to a parked page.
---
src/download | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --gi
> >
>
> > Do you think it's better to only authorize few colorspace ?
>
> depends on what happens if "others" are stored.
> if the official decoders fail with a blank screen then its probably
> not a good idea to use such a value. If OTOH they ignore values they
> do not support then it may be ok.
On 20-07-2018 10:01 PM, Danil Iashchenko wrote:
+@section avgblur_opencl
+
+Apply average blur filter.
+
+The filter accepts the following options:
+
+@table @option
+@item sizeX
+Set horizontal radius size. By default value is @code{1}.
State range as well for all options, e.g.
Range is
On 21.07.2018 20:31, Marcin Gorzel wrote:
Rematrixing supports up to 64 channels. However, there is only a limited number
of channel layouts defined. Since the in/out channel count is currently
obtained from the channel layout, for undefined layouts (e.g. for 9, 10, 11
channels etc.) the remat
15 matches
Mail list logo
