On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed,
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, James Almer wrote:
> >> > On 11/25/2015 8:32 PM,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On W
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, N
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, No
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On systems having cbrt, there is no reason to use the slow pow function.
>>>
>>> Sample benchma
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, James Almer wrote:
>>> > On 11/25/2015 8:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanag
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, James Almer wrote:
>> > On 11/25/2015 8:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, James Almer wrote:
> > On 11/25/2015 8:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Ganes
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, James Almer wrote:
> On 11/25/2015 8:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>>> wrote:
On systems having cbrt, there is no reason t
On 11/25/2015 8:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On systems having cbrt, there is no reason to use the slow pow function.
>>>
>>> Sample benchmark (x86-64,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On systems having cbrt, there is no reason to use the slow pow function.
>>
>> Sample benchmark (x86-64, Haswell, GNU/Linux):
>> new:
>> 5124920 decicycles in cbrt
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On systems having cbrt, there is no reason to use the slow pow function.
>
> Sample benchmark (x86-64, Haswell, GNU/Linux):
> new:
> 5124920 decicycles in cbrt_tableinit, 1 runs, 0 skips
>
> old:
> 12321680 decicycles in
On systems having cbrt, there is no reason to use the slow pow function.
Sample benchmark (x86-64, Haswell, GNU/Linux):
new:
5124920 decicycles in cbrt_tableinit, 1 runs, 0 skips
old:
12321680 decicycles in cbrt_tableinit, 1 runs, 0 skips
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
15 matches
Mail list logo