applied
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 01:07:57PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> From: Roman Arzumanyan
>
> Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
> ---
> configure | 5 +-
> doc/filters.texi | 42 +++
> libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
> libavfilter/allfilters.c
From: Roman Arzumanyan
Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
---
configure | 5 +-
doc/filters.texi | 42 +++
libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 +
libavfilter/version.h | 2 +-
libavfilter/vf_transpose_npp.c
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:31:49AM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> On 9/9/2018 2:12 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 03:49:29PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> >>From: Roman Arzumanyan
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
> >>---
> >>I'm not overly a fan of a rot
On 9/9/2018 2:12 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 03:49:29PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
From: Roman Arzumanyan
Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
---
I'm not overly a fan of a rotate filter that only support 90° angles
either.
So here's my modified version of the orig
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 03:49:29PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> From: Roman Arzumanyan
>
> Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
> ---
> I'm not overly a fan of a rotate filter that only support 90° angles
> either.
> So here's my modified version of the original transpose filter, which
> now be
On 9/8/2018 5:38 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
I'll probably remove the interp_algo from this before committing, hard
coding it to nearest neighbor. I'm unable to see any difference between
them for perfect 90DEG angles except that NN is easily 10 times faster
than the current default Cubic.
Perhaps
On 9/8/18, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> On 9/8/2018 3:49 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>> From: Roman Arzumanyan
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
>> ---
>> I'm not overly a fan of a rotate filter that only support 90DEG angles
>> either.
>> So here's my modified version of the original transp
On 9/8/2018 3:49 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
From: Roman Arzumanyan
Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
---
I'm not overly a fan of a rotate filter that only support 90° angles
either.
So here's my modified version of the original transpose filter, which
now behaves the exact same as the softwar
From: Roman Arzumanyan
Signed-off-by: Timo Rothenpieler
---
I'm not overly a fan of a rotate filter that only support 90° angles
either.
So here's my modified version of the original transpose filter, which
now behaves the exact same as the software transpose filter.
Additionally, I removed the
10 matches
Mail list logo