On 30/05/2018 00:48, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Sorry I missed that! I'd prefer to use your patch over mine.
>
> iam fine with sasis original patch too
Pushed with the changes that were requested in that thread.
- Derek
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:20:33PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Sasi Inguva
> wrote:
> > Hi. sorry for the late reply. I sent a patch similar to this a while back
> > https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/8227/ but it got lost in the sea. You
> > also wa
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Sasi Inguva
wrote:
> Hi. sorry for the late reply. I sent a patch similar to this a while back
> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/8227/ but it got lost in the sea. You
> also want to do,
Sorry I missed that! I'd prefer to use your patch over mine.
I'll ho
Hi. sorry for the late reply. I sent a patch similar to this a while back
https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/8227/ but it got lost in the sea. You
also want to do,
@@ -3579,7 +3579,8 @@ static void mov_fix_index(MOVContext *mov, AVStream
*st)
frame_duration_buffer[num_disc
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> We already did this for audio, but it should be done for video too.
> If we don't, seeking back to the start of the file, for example, can
> become quite broken, since the first N packets will have repeating
> and nonmonotonic PTS, yet the
tis 2018-05-15 klockan 21:21 +0100 skrev Derek Buitenhuis:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Tomas Härdin
> wrote:
> > Why don't we do this for every format?
>
> In this case, it is specific to MOV and MP4, since it's caused by the
> way we apply edit lists at the packet level (reordering, marki
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> Why don't we do this for every format?
In this case, it is specific to MOV and MP4, since it's caused by the
way we apply edit lists at the packet level (reordering, marking them
as discard, changing timestamps, etc.). Previously we didn't mu
tis 2018-05-15 klockan 20:44 +0100 skrev Derek Buitenhuis:
> We already did this for audio, but it should be done for video too.
> If we don't, seeking back to the start of the file, for example, can
> become quite broken, since the first N packets will have repeating
> and nonmonotonic PTS, yet th
We already did this for audio, but it should be done for video too.
If we don't, seeking back to the start of the file, for example, can
become quite broken, since the first N packets will have repeating
and nonmonotonic PTS, yet they need to be decoded even if they are
to be discarded.
Signed-off