Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] x86/swr: replace sse4 instructions in pack_6ch with sse ones

2014-11-06 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:11:27PM -0300, James Almer wrote: There's no benefit from using blendps here except on CPUs with AVX, where it's faster than shufps according to Intel's documentation. As such, rename the sse4 functions to sse/sse2 and use shufps instead. Signed-off-by: James Almer

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] x86/swr: replace sse4 instructions in pack_6ch with sse ones

2014-11-06 Thread James Almer
On 06/11/14 8:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:11:27PM -0300, James Almer wrote: There's no benefit from using blendps here except on CPUs with AVX, where it's faster than shufps according to Intel's documentation. As such, rename the sse4 functions to sse/sse2 and

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] x86/swr: replace sse4 instructions in pack_6ch with sse ones

2014-11-04 Thread James Almer
There's no benefit from using blendps here except on CPUs with AVX, where it's faster than shufps according to Intel's documentation. As such, rename the sse4 functions to sse/sse2 and use shufps instead. Signed-off-by: James Almer jamr...@gmail.com --- libswresample/x86/audio_convert.asm|