On 5/3/18 10:11 PM, Jan Ekström wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Jan Ekström wrote:
>> Personally I would be for removal of the WebM muxing feature in dashenc
>> altogether, since the dashenc feature has never seemingly worked, and
>> since there is a whole separate WebM-specific DASH me
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Jan Ekström wrote:
> Personally I would be for removal of the WebM muxing feature in dashenc
> altogether, since the dashenc feature has never seemingly worked, and
> since there is a whole separate WebM-specific DASH meta muxer in
> webmdashenc.
>
> But these patc
On 4/27/18 6:21 AM, Jan Ekström wrote:
> Personally I would be for removal of the WebM muxing feature in dashenc
> altogether, since the dashenc feature has never seemingly worked, and
> since there is a whole separate WebM-specific DASH meta muxer in
> webmdashenc.
>
> But these patches should a
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Jan Ekström wrote:
> Personally I would be for removal of the WebM muxing feature in dashenc
> altogether, since the dashenc feature has never seemingly worked, and
> since there is a whole separate WebM-specific DASH meta muxer in
> webmdashenc.
>
> But these patc
Personally I would be for removal of the WebM muxing feature in dashenc
altogether, since the dashenc feature has never seemingly worked, and
since there is a whole separate WebM-specific DASH meta muxer in
webmdashenc.
But these patches should at least make the thing not crash, and put it
under F
