2016-09-25 5:59 GMT+02:00 James Almer :
> As Lukas suggested in another email, it would be a good idea
> to keep using "sdl" instead of "sdl2" on things like the outdev
> name and the configure option (--enable/disable-sdl). So
> basically, anything an user could interact with.
If this gets chang
On 9/24/2016 1:17 PM, Josh de Kock wrote:
> On 22/09/2016 20:28, Josh de Kock wrote:
>> Hopefully the final iteration of this set--it drops SDL1 support
>> entirely rather than adding another ffplay version and keeping the
>> SDL1 output device. All of it has been reviewed before, so there
>> shoul
On 24 September 2016 at 18:17, Josh de Kock wrote:
> On 22/09/2016 20:28, Josh de Kock wrote:
>
>> Hopefully the final iteration of this set--it drops SDL1 support
>> entirely rather than adding another ffplay version and keeping the
>> SDL1 output device. All of it has been reviewed before, so t
2016-09-24 18:17 GMT+02:00 Josh de Kock :
> On 22/09/2016 20:28, Josh de Kock wrote:
> Set applied.
Please write a short news entry for the homepage.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/
On 22/09/2016 20:28, Josh de Kock wrote:
Hopefully the final iteration of this set--it drops SDL1 support
entirely rather than adding another ffplay version and keeping the
SDL1 output device. All of it has been reviewed before, so there
shouldn't be too much (or anything to change).
Josh de Koc
Hopefully the final iteration of this set--it drops SDL1 support
entirely rather than adding another ffplay version and keeping the
SDL1 output device. All of it has been reviewed before, so there
shouldn't be too much (or anything to change).
Josh de Kock (3):
lavd: Add SDL2 output device
MAI
