Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Clement Boesch a écrit :
> My bad, you're right, I was looking at the wrong header with the same
> variable names. Dismiss my comment.
Ok, series pushed.
> I'd say that a counter is unlikely to require a sign vs unsigned
> optimization (and if it does and we kno
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 11:01:22PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Clement Boesch a écrit :
> > nb_filters and nb_outputs are signed so the counters better be the same
> > type.
>
> I re-checked, I think you are mistaken.
>
My bad, you're right, I was looking at
Le primidi 11 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Clement Boesch a écrit :
> nb_filters and nb_outputs are signed so the counters better be the same
> type.
I re-checked, I think you are mistaken.
> I think we already had that discussion but I'd rather have the counters
> signed so the compiler can exploit the
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:39:52PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> For now, check the image size.
> Inspired by a patch from Paul B Mahol.
>
> Invalid sizes would be detected later by allocation failures,
> detecting problems earlier is cleaner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
> ---
> libavfil
On 11/1/17, Nicolas George wrote:
> For now, check the image size.
> Inspired by a patch from Paul B Mahol.
>
> Invalid sizes would be detected later by allocation failures,
> detecting problems earlier is cleaner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
> ---
> libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c | 24 ++
For now, check the image size.
Inspired by a patch from Paul B Mahol.
Invalid sizes would be detected later by allocation failures,
detecting problems earlier is cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
---
libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+
