On 4/28/2019 7:59 PM, Mark Thompson wrote:
> On 17/04/2019 03:56, James Almer wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> Better macro names welcome. I used the same convention as in cbs_av1.
>>
>> fate-cbs passes, but i'm sure a bunch of these are not tested by it,
>> so help double checking i
On 17/04/2019 03:56, James Almer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Better macro names welcome. I used the same convention as in cbs_av1.
>
> fate-cbs passes, but i'm sure a bunch of these are not tested by it,
> so help double checking i didn't screw up is welcome.
>
> libavcodec/cbs_
On 4/16/2019 11:56 PM, James Almer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Better macro names welcome. I used the same convention as in cbs_av1.
>
> fate-cbs passes, but i'm sure a bunch of these are not tested by it,
> so help double checking i didn't screw up is welcome.
>
> libavcodec/cb
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
Better macro names welcome. I used the same convention as in cbs_av1.
fate-cbs passes, but i'm sure a bunch of these are not tested by it,
so help double checking i didn't screw up is welcome.
libavcodec/cbs_h2645.c| 10 +-
libavcodec/cbs_h264_syn