Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/5] avcodec/cuviddec: Add support for decoding HEVC 4:4:4 content

2018-10-20 Thread Philip Langdale
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 23:10:57 +0200 Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > > > > -for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > +pixdesc = av_pix_fmt_desc_get(avctx->sw_pix_fmt); > > + > > +for (i = 0; i < pixdesc->nb_components; i++) { > > +size_t height = avctx->height

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/5] avcodec/cuviddec: Add support for decoding HEVC 4:4:4 content

2018-10-20 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 20.10.2018 22:47, Philip Langdale wrote: This is the equivalent change for cuviddec after the previous change for nvdec. I made similar changes to the copying routines to handle pixel formats in a more generic way. Note that unlike with nvdec, there is no confusion about the ability of a code

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/5] avcodec/cuviddec: Add support for decoding HEVC 4:4:4 content

2018-10-20 Thread Philip Langdale
This is the equivalent change for cuviddec after the previous change for nvdec. I made similar changes to the copying routines to handle pixel formats in a more generic way. Note that unlike with nvdec, there is no confusion about the ability of a codec to output 444 formats. This is because the c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/5] avcodec/cuviddec: Add support for decoding HEVC 4:4:4 content

2018-10-07 Thread Philip Langdale
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 10:50:56 -0700 Philip Langdale wrote: > This is the equivalent change for cuviddec after the previous change > for nvdec. I made similar changes to the copying routines to handle > pixel formats in a more generic way. > > Note that unlike with nvdec, there is no confusion abo

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/5] avcodec/cuviddec: Add support for decoding HEVC 4:4:4 content

2018-10-07 Thread Philip Langdale
This is the equivalent change for cuviddec after the previous change for nvdec. I made similar changes to the copying routines to handle pixel formats in a more generic way. Note that unlike with nvdec, there is no confusion about the ability of a codec to output 444 formats. This is because the c